Sylwia Amina :autismcreature: :transgender_pride_potion: :Moon2258FullSpaceside: @trans_caracal@social.translunar.academy
Public

People were recommending me this book but it has problems like him excusing Muslim Imperialism or calling Hamas, Hezbollah, ISIS a "non-statist movement" comparing them to "statist liberals". Also uses a "crusading society" rethoric which is actually what Islamists say. In Coffee with Comrades he actually says at point 20:00:

"All due respect to then and legacy that their left I'm certainly talking about Pan-Africanist movements, pan-Arabist movements extending from Nasser..."

This guy is actually an Arab nationalist it seems even if he says some good things bad parts weight very heavily here.
https://organisemagazine.org.uk/2022/11/16/islam-and-anarchism-review/?ref=thecommoner.org.uk
This crisis can be seen in the Muslim thinkers from the late 1800s like Muhammad Abduh and early 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s, such as non-conformist militant conservatives like Sayyid Qutb (1954) and Abul Alā Al-Mawdūdī (1967) as well as liberal reformists like Muhammad Iqbal (2000) and Fazlur Rahman Malik (1982). Though some of these non-conformist orthodox Muslims like Qutb laid the foundation for non-statist Islamist movements ranging from Hamas, Hezbollah, to al-Qaeda, and ISIS, other Islamists like Iqbal and Rahman ultimately propagated views that subjugated Islām to political platformism relative to the liberal-state when they saw no other path in which an Umma can be achieved.
0
0
0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://social.translunar.academy/objects/ece1a04b-eaa5-4bd6-8e07-204013f0b745 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)