What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
0
0
0

o3의 사진 위치 ​​추측은 초현실적이고 디스토피아적이며 재미남
------------------------------
- *OpenAI의 새로운 모델 o3* 는 사진만 보고 촬영 장소를 놀라울 정도로 정확히 추측하는 능력을 가짐
- *사진의 시각적 단서* 를 분석하고, 확대/크롭 작업을 통해 더 많은 디테일을 끌어내는 과정을 보여줌
- *Cambria, California* 를 첫 번째로 추측했지만, 두 번째 추측인
El Granada 가 정확히 맞음

------------------------------
https://news.hada.io/topic?id=20549&utm_source=googlechat&utm_medium=bot&utm_campaign=1834

0
0
0

https://hackers.pub/?filter=local

와 이제 여기는 순수 개발이야기만 하는 국산 개발 SNS가 되었네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
사람도 계속 들어오는거 보면 장난 아닌 듯

얘가 한국 페디버스(연합우주)의 새로운 바람인 듯

0

https://hackers.pub/?filter=local

와 이제 여기는 순수 개발이야기만 하는 국산 개발 SNS가 되었네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
사람도 계속 들어오는거 보면 장난 아닌 듯

얘가 한국 페디버스(연합우주)의 새로운 바람인 듯

3
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0

身為一個上禮拜有去到419「守護台灣拒絕統戰」遊行現場的人,再看到昨天426的遊行,更加確定,在撕裂台灣的就是藍白兩黨。

419大家談的是和解,跨黨派的包容和愛,以及堅定守護台灣的立場,看見創意百花齊放的宣傳手板,中華民國的國旗和台灣獨立的國旗在同一個場地飛揚,台上宣講的是罷團發言人、導演、醫生、國民黨退伍軍人、KOL⋯⋯ 等民眾,雖也有綠營政治人物上台,但沒有一個政治人物穿著該黨派的「制服」,底下都是一個個自發性前往會場的民眾,不需遊覽車跟便當。

426申請「合法的集會遊行」,挺「違法的抄襲連署」,在台上一整排國民黨政治人物,穿著制服,用台灣的言論自由,哭喊沒有言論自由,底下舉的是來自各縣市的遊覽車手板,坐著遊覽車,動員來的民眾,還包含搞不清楚狀況的外籍移工。事前還規定大家不可以舉什麼旗,舉了你們就要往死裡打?

說這樣代表民意?只再一次證明你們為了撕裂台灣不擇手段,你們才是不能包容異己的「獨裁專制」。

就跟賴清德總統說的一樣:

藍白上街證明更台灣民主,如果真正要戰獨裁,應該去北京天安門,至少在中國見到獨裁集團時,不要再卑躬屈膝。
(1/2)

敢於向獨裁者爭取國家主權,傳達台灣人民希望民主、自由與人權生活方式心聲,要求獨裁者放棄武力攻台,求得兩岸和平,這才是真正「戰獨裁」。

-
然後昨天趁著426不在家,我去當中三拒瓔的志工,幫忙拉連署書。
還真的有非常害怕的民眾告訴我,簽這個不會被知道吧?不會被打吧?
覺得很悲哀,一個人民選出來的民意代表,讓人民害怕成這樣。
不要再支持那些讓你感到恐懼的人,不要再把選票給這樣的人好嗎?

(後來我們一直安撫他,放心絕對不會知道,今天簽最安全,426都去台北了⋯⋯)。

影片:來簽連署的都獲得英雄式的誇誇🫶(非故事中害怕的那位當事人,這位民眾特別從海外飛回來連署!)

0

身為一個上禮拜有去到419「守護台灣拒絕統戰」遊行現場的人,再看到昨天426的遊行,更加確定,在撕裂台灣的就是藍白兩黨。

419大家談的是和解,跨黨派的包容和愛,以及堅定守護台灣的立場,看見創意百花齊放的宣傳手板,中華民國的國旗和台灣獨立的國旗在同一個場地飛揚,台上宣講的是罷團發言人、導演、醫生、國民黨退伍軍人、KOL⋯⋯ 等民眾,雖也有綠營政治人物上台,但沒有一個政治人物穿著該黨派的「制服」,底下都是一個個自發性前往會場的民眾,不需遊覽車跟便當。

426申請「合法的集會遊行」,挺「違法的抄襲連署」,在台上一整排國民黨政治人物,穿著制服,用台灣的言論自由,哭喊沒有言論自由,底下舉的是來自各縣市的遊覽車手板,坐著遊覽車,動員來的民眾,還包含搞不清楚狀況的外籍移工。事前還規定大家不可以舉什麼旗,舉了你們就要往死裡打?

說這樣代表民意?只再一次證明你們為了撕裂台灣不擇手段,你們才是不能包容異己的「獨裁專制」。

就跟賴清德總統說的一樣:

藍白上街證明更台灣民主,如果真正要戰獨裁,應該去北京天安門,至少在中國見到獨裁集團時,不要再卑躬屈膝。
(1/2)

0
0

當罷免志工站在街上,昨天碰到立場不同的路人落下一句話,「該感謝OOO,讓你們有工作做」。

我想說志工的確是工作,邏輯思考無誤啊,這是在嗆人還是在誇獎?腦袋當機15秒才發現是在說拿錢辦事,還來不及反駁,就被他逃跑了。

立場不同用嗆聲來表達,當然是一種方式,可是為什麼他們的情緒會糟糕到控制不住,直接用嗆人,甚至暴力表達訴求呢?

幾年前一個研究一直放在心上:Twitter 演算法會放大憤怒、敵意和促成極化
g0v.social/@jimyhuang/11045665

我相信有意識的人,絕對能感受到,不只 Twitter 的演算法,各式社群媒體演算法,都會碰到這類問題。

常見的促成敵意方案,就是把對方去人性化,抹成為了利益,抹成沒有臉的樣貌,從網路到媒體都是吸收這類資訊,輕鬆就可以用謾罵來抒發,用憤怒吸引跟隨或按讚,為何不呢?

但久了之後,等實際上看到人臉時,彼此還能看得到對方的人性嗎?

我覺得健全公民社會面對最大的敵人,是仇恨,可是這時代的仇恨,實在太輕易就推送到即使差別沒有這麼大的彼此眼前。

所以我很喜歡站長貼的一句話,這裡的管理員不是無臉的人,是有臉默默維護小站的志工(大意)

0
0

実験レポートに「およそ」とか「概ね」とか使ってよいのだろうか。主観的な表現になってしまうのであまり使いたくないが、「波形が一致している」とか「波形が概ね一致している」とか伝えたくても。一致度を表せるような指標もないので困る。

0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0

Berkeley Humanoid Lite - 오픈소스 로봇
------------------------------
- *Berkeley 휴머노이드 라이트* 는 접근성과 커스터마이징 가능성을 높인 *오픈소스 3D 프린팅 휴머노이드 로봇*
- *3D 프린터* 와 *일반 부품 구매* 만으로 제작 가능하며, 총 비용은 *$5,000 이하* 임
- *사이클로이드 기어* 설계를 통해 3D 프린팅 부품의 내구성 한계를 극복함
-
강화학습을 통한 …
------------------------------
https://news.hada.io/topic?id=20547&utm_source=googlechat&utm_medium=bot&utm_campaign=1834

0
0
0

아니 자궁 소지자 같은 말은 시스젠더 여성을 달리 부르기 위해 마련된 단어가 아니고 젠더 상관없이 질이나 자궁을 가진 사람을 부르기 위해 만들어진 말입니다. 지정성별 여성 논바이너리인 저 같은 사람을 부르기 위해서요. 나는 자궁을 가졌을 뿐이지 여성인 건 아니니까 자궁 소지자로 불려야 합니다. 죄송한데 진짜 트위터랑 블스가 뭐가 다르단 건지 이젠 정말 모르겠네.

1
0
0
0
0

Linux communities beware of #PewDiePie fans

Regardless of PewDiePie’s personal #politics (which clearly, at the very least are problematic), it is fairly well known by anyone who has been following him for any number of years that the vast majority of his fan base are enthusiastic fascists.

Now #PewDiePie , who’s content centers around PC gaming and Windows, has decided to switch to #Linux and published a video encouraging his followers to do the same. This means a very large number of his #fascist fan base is going to be switching to Linux.

Now many Linux communities are going to be forced to more explicitly choose their politics. Like the parable of the Nazi bar, if the community remains politically neutral, it will become fascist in short order.

A few things to be wary of:

  • People asking you not to be “too political” or to “focus on the technology, not the politics” is a classic and highly effective fascist ruse to get moderators to lighten up on fascist elements posting in their community.
  • People complaining about free speech rights. The #Internet and the #Fediverse is already a domain where people can speak freely about their politics by running their own server and building their own community with few to no government constraints. You don’t need to compromise on whether fascists have the right to free speech in your community.
  • Arguments over your code of conduct (CC) and “safe spaces.” Keep them up-to-date. Research other people’s CCs, learn about the history of why these CCs came to be, learn about what the function of each clause of the code is included and phrased the way it is. These were usually designed to make explicit the fact that a community wants to be a safe space where underprivileged people can feel comfortable expressing themselves, and it is very easy to make people afraid to express themselves. Fascists understand these CCs and the concept of “safe spaces” were explicitly designed to exclude them, and often attack these ideas.
0
0

當罷免志工站在街上,昨天碰到立場不同的路人落下一句話,「該感謝OOO,讓你們有工作做」。

我想說志工的確是工作,邏輯思考無誤啊,這是在嗆人還是在誇獎?腦袋當機15秒才發現是在說拿錢辦事,還來不及反駁,就被他逃跑了。

立場不同用嗆聲來表達,當然是一種方式,可是為什麼他們的情緒會糟糕到控制不住,直接用嗆人,甚至暴力表達訴求呢?

幾年前一個研究一直放在心上:Twitter 演算法會放大憤怒、敵意和促成極化
g0v.social/@jimyhuang/11045665

我相信有意識的人,絕對能感受到,不只 Twitter 的演算法,各式社群媒體演算法,都會碰到這類問題。

常見的促成敵意方案,就是把對方去人性化,抹成為了利益,抹成沒有臉的樣貌,從網路到媒體都是吸收這類資訊,輕鬆就可以用謾罵來抒發,用憤怒吸引跟隨或按讚,為何不呢?

但久了之後,等實際上看到人臉時,彼此還能看得到對方的人性嗎?

我覺得健全公民社會面對最大的敵人,是仇恨,可是這時代的仇恨,實在太輕易就推送到即使差別沒有這麼大的彼此眼前。

所以我很喜歡站長貼的一句話,這裡的管理員不是無臉的人,是有臉默默維護小站的志工(大意)

0

Canadians using Twitter/X are being bombarded by misleading right-wing posts designed to boost Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre and tarnish the reputation of Mark Carney.

The FT’s analysis finds a growing volume of that misinformation is coming not from Russia or China, but the United States.

ft.com/content/743c1dec-0c5c-4

0
0
0
0