What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0

원본 글이 삭제되어 어떤 글이었는지 알 수는 없지만, 정가 구입과 관련해 개인적인 생각은, "기대하고 기다려온 게임이었다면 펀딩의 차원에서 가급적 정가로 예판을 구입해준다." 랄까. 어쨌든, 게임 개발사들도 초기 판매량에 영향을 받을 수 밖에 없고, 이 영향은 추후 서비스나 후속작에도 영향을 미칠테니까. 게임 가격이 10만원을 향해가는 시대에 그래도 아깝지 않는냐? 라는 생각이 안드는건 아닌데, 매달 새로운 게임 구입에 10만원씩 쓰는 것도 아니고, 여전히 다른 취미와 비교하면 그렇게 비싼 비용지출은 아니라서...

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:v2ob6je7otkaffdktzdaywzp/post/3lodd4k5efc27

0
0

물론 이러니 저러니 해도 창작자, 개발자에게 가장 큰 도움이 되는건 역시 구입해주는 것. 내가 좋아하는 컨텐츠가 계속 될 수 있도록 도움을 주기 위해서는 우선 그 컨텐츠를 구입해야한다. 당장 구입한 게임을 플레이하지 못하고, 적독가라는 타이틀을 단다고 하더라도. 언젠가는 플레이하고 읽지 않을까?

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:de27rm6eyuf5ez6gmvjdmilq/post/3lodf3xugxk2z

1

In , we currently have a "Volksbegehren" (petition for a referendum) for less annoying advertisements in the city, @hhwerbefreiInitiative Hamburg Werbefrei

The proposal is to ban all ads that are larger than DIN A0, backlit, moving, or too many in one place!

We need 80000 signatures to have a citywide referendum. If you live in Hamburg and are older than 16, please support this!

Learn how: hamburg-werbefrei.de

The logo of the movement, a castle protected from barcode lines using an umbrella.
0
0
0

Wir reden ja immer von "Digitalisierung", was meist ziemlicher Quatsch ist.

Ich habe mir etwa gerade eine "französische Bahncard 30" gekauft, welche ich als PDF ausdrucken kann. Darauf ist dann ein QR-Code. Das ist genauso viel und wenig digital wie der QR-Code in der SNCF-App oder das PDF auf dem Handy. (You get it?)

Die SNCF spricht beim Import von der App daher auch nicht von "digitalisieren", sondern "entmaterialisieren".

Danke dafür!

@ ENTMATERIALISIEREN SIE IHRE KARTE

Bereit? Entmaterialisieren? Wie entmaterialisiere ich meine Karte?

Mit meiner entmaterialisierten Karte reise ich: « Auf der Website tgvinoui.sncf: Ich gehe zu ,Mes cartes” (Meine
Karten), ,Dématérialiser votre carte” (Ihre Karte entmaterialisieren).

« Leichter: Ich muss meine ErmaRigungskarte nicht mehr mithehmen,

sondern habe sie jederzeit abrufbereit auf meinem Smartphone dabei.

« Einfacher: Alle meine Reisedokumente (Ticket + ErmaRigungskarte)

befinden sich an der gleichen Stelle auf meinem Smartphone

« Sorgloser: Bei der Fahrkartenkontrolle brauche ich mir keine Sorgen

mehr zu machen, die Karte verloren oder vergessen zu haben. Ich

zeige einfach den QR-Code meiner Karte auf meinem Smartphone.

oO WISSENSWERTES

Wie entmaterialisiere ich meine Karte? Ich habe meine Karte vergessen, wie kann ich sie

) ) . Co ) finden?
Diese Karte ist personlich und nicht Gbertragbar und muss bei den
yr i. ’ _—_— Cw vr a . — wy . CO Lmrd mm lw Avsmmmbdmemem TCA INIA 1 I mdm md mover om 2h
0
0
0
0
0
0

물론 이러니 저러니 해도 창작자, 개발자에게 가장 큰 도움이 되는건 역시 구입해주는 것. 내가 좋아하는 컨텐츠가 계속 될 수 있도록 도움을 주기 위해서는 우선 그 컨텐츠를 구입해야한다. 당장 구입한 게임을 플레이하지 못하고, 적독가라는 타이틀을 단다고 하더라도. 언젠가는 플레이하고 읽지 않을까?

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:de27rm6eyuf5ez6gmvjdmilq/post/3lodf3xugxk2z

1
0

How does banning a party work in Germany, and why do we even want to ban a party?

a simple explanation

One of the German intelligence agencies, specifically the "Bundesverfassungsschutz" (Federal Constitution Protection Agency), has produced a more than 1000 pages long report about the AfD, a party you surely know by now.
The report contains a thorough analysis of AfD's ideology and their connection to extremist groups all over the world.

This report and the work the agency does, is something like a warning system. The agency itself can not make any decisions about the legitimacy of a party, and neither can they interfere or disrupt a parties political work. All they are allowed to do is to listen in and collect proof of a parties anti-democratic/unconstitutional tendencies and plans using intelligence gathering techniques like hiring informants, tapping phone lines, analyzing network traffic, etc... This is only allowed, if significant concerns have been raised about a party that is allegedly acting against our constitution or planning serious action against our democratic state. If a preliminary analysis confirms those concerns, the agency gets the power to use said surveillance against the party in question.
In the case of the AfD, they have been a suspected extremist party for several years now, allowing the agency to surveil their communications and inner workings, until they came to the conclusion, that the AfD is indeed fighting our democratic state and are following a right-wing extremist ideology, something that is incompatible with our constitution.

Now that a flag has been raised, there are obvious reasons the party needs to be hindered from successfully eroding or even destroying our democracy. In Germany we have multiple paragraphs in our constitution that allow for a ban of all parties, groups, and organisations that are aggressively attacking the foundation of our free democratic state, are planning to remove the constitution, or to significantly alter it by force or with other antidemocratic means. There are specific extra-strict laws about banning parties since making that too easy would also make it easier for oppressive governments to ban democratic parties. Part of these laws is also the condition that the party has to be significant enough to have actual potential to cause damage.
How that works: The ONLY way to ban a party here in Germany, is to task our supreme court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) to review a parties incompatibility with our constitutional law and to declare a ban on them and all following organisation's trying to bring back that party. The review process often takes years and is extremely thorough since banning a party is a pretty extreme "ultima ratio" measure.

The idea behind banning a party is not to convince them or their voters that they were on the wrong path or to punish them in favor of other parties. The paragraphs for banning a party have been created explicitly to protect the state, its institutions and citizens from harm coming from said party and its structures, members, and supporters.
The voters will still be there. The members will still be extremist. But the party as an organized way of preparing harmful actions will be destroyed, and all following attempts to bring it back under a new name, with a new image, etc. will be outlawed as well.

Last but not least, our German supreme court, which specializes explicitly on dealing with issues related to the constitution and the constitutional rights of the people, will not start the process of banning a party on its own. It needs to be tasked with that by either the parliament (Bundestag), the federal council (Bundesrat), or the acting government (Bundesregierung).

After having been tasked with the review, the court will start a long investigation into the organisation, in our case the AfD, and will collect evidence that supports the claim that they are unconstitutional. For that, it also uses the 1100-page report of the "Verfassungsschutz", police reports, other court cases against the party, etc.

Should the court decide the AfD is actually unconstitutional, which in my opinion, and the opinion of many experts here, is highly likely, the party will be banned and ordered to seize all its operations, and to disband their headquarters and all other places they've worked in. They will also be forbidden to found a new party trying to replace it. If the party continues to organize action, not as a party any more but as a banned organisation, law enforcement will enforce the ban and disrupt any action taken by members of it, that contribute to the goals of the former party.

Now that the AfD has been officially found to be right-wing extremist, the pressure on our government, parliament and federal council is rising to ask the Supreme Court to review a ban of the AfD. There are no more excuses. If this actually happens, remains to be seen.

(As of right now, our conservatives and neo-liberals are still opposing a vote to start the judicial investigation against the AfD)

A little remark from @nicobruenjesNico, that really shows how strict the rules around banning parties are:

So far, the Supreme Court only banned two parties in the history of our Federal Republic: The SRP (Sozialistische Reichspartei) in 1952, which was an openly acting successor organisation of the Nazi Party NSDAP. And the KPD (Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands), the communist party of Germany in 1956.

0
0
0

마냥 "여성에게 꾸밈이 강요된다"라는 한 줄만 인식할 것이 아니고, 사회가 여성에게 "아름답고 단정하고 성적 매력이 있되 직장에 맞게 절제력 있어야 하며 문란하지 않고 지나치게 화려하지 않기"를 강요한다고 정확하게 아는 게 중요하다. 남성에겐 단정한 복장만 요구하면서 여성에게는 160 초중반대의 키와 진하지 않은 색조 화장과 단정한 외모를 요구하는 여성혐오적 규정을 가진 회사에 퀸가비 착장으로 등장하면 남자들이 기뻐하겠나. 기겁을 하지. 하지만 터프들은 그런 식으로 입은 여성을 남성에게 굴종적이라고 비난한다. 단단히 착각하고 있다.

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0