What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0

미드나잇스카이 개발일기

오늘은 피드 쪽 개발! as로 떡칠되어있던 코드들을 싹 다 타입 가드로 바꾸고... 복잡했던 Embed 부분을 코드 분리하고 다른 분 코드 참고해서 깔끔하게 바꿨습니다!

미드나잇스카이 개발 중인 피드 화면미드나잇스카이 임베드 코드
1
3
1
0
3
1
0
3
1
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0

Japan’s digital future depends on talent

The 2025 State of Tech Talent Japan Report from Linux Foundation Research and LF Education shows why upskilling is essential to addressing Japan’s growing skills gap in AI and cloud

Read the report: linuxfoundation.org/research/t

0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1

I need help. First the question: On , with all ports built with , can I somehow use the on a binary actually using LibreSSL and get sane output?

What I now observe debugging :

- A version built with (from base) doesn't crash. At least I tried very hard, really stressing it with , to no avail. Built with LibreSSL, it does crash.
- Less relevant: the OpenSSL version also performs slightly better, but needs almost twice the RAM
- The thread sanitizer finds nothing to complain when built with OpenSSL
- It complains a lot with LibreSSL, but the reports look "fishy", e.g. it seems to intercept some OpenSSL API functions (like SHA384_Final)
- It even complains when running with a single-thread event loop.
- I use a single SSL_CTX per listening socket, creating SSL objects from it per connection ... also with multithreading; according to a few sources, this should be supported and safe.
- I can't imagine doing that on a *single* thread could break with LibreSSL, I mean, this would make SSL_CTX pretty much pointless
- I *could* imagine sharing the SSL_CTX with multiple threads to create their SSL objects from *might* not be safe with LibreSSL, but no idea how to verify as long as the thread sanitizer gives me "delusional" output 😳

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0

NL pol / budget cuts on higher education

🟥 Call to action from FNV:

Yesterday (June 17), opposition parties GL-PvdA, SP, Denk, Volt, and PvdD submitted a proposal to reverse the cuts to education. This is *the moment* to prevent the worst damage on our education.

📅 Today (June 18), the House of Representatives will debate this proposal. Next week on Tuesday (June 24), the vote will follow. These days are critical to raise the pressure. That’s why FNV has launched an *email action*.

📧 *With just a few clicks, send an email to the party leaders of D66, VVD, NSC, CDA, CU, and JA21*: fnv.nl/cao-sector/overheid/ond. To Ask them clearly: Will you choose to invest in our future or continue the destruction of higher education?

✊ Together, we can stop the cuts. 

0
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0