What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3

猫飼いさん!!!腎不全ジッカネコに知恵を貸してくれ!!!!!

低体温すぎるってことで病院からエアコン禁止令が出されたんだけどさすがに人間やほかの健康な猫が危険だなぁと思いまして なんとかエアコンをつけつつ腎不全猫を温められる策がないか 知恵をいただきたいです……🙏
ワンルームでエアコンの影響を受けない部屋がないという前提で なにか案があれば教えてください
:issyou_no_onegai:
可愛いジッカネコの写真もそえておきますね

0
0
1

Oh no…now Meta is automatically sharing our private messages to its AI. As far as I can tell, you can only turn it off for each message thread, one at a time (and there seems to be no option to turn it off *at all* for group threads!). Yet another privacy disaster from Facebook.

I use Messenger btw for family and non-tech friends, so don’t (ahem) shoot the messenger.

Popup in Messenger:

messenger
• Ask Meta Al or Search
Do more in your chats with Meta Al
Now people in your chats can share messages with Meta Al to summarize conversations, edit images, suggest replies and more. Shared messages may be used to improve Al at Meta.
Learn moreHelp text:

‹ Manage message sharing permissions fo...
Help Center
Turn off message sharing permissions in a chat on Messenger
1. From your inbox, open a chat on Messenger.
2. Tap the name of the chat at the top.
3. Below Privacy & support, tap • Message permissions.
4. Tap the toggle next to Allow message sharing © to turn off message sharing. Tap it again to turn it on.
If you turn off message sharing:
• The option to auto-save photos will also be turned off.
• No one in the chat will be able to use Al features that involve sharing messages with Meta Al, such as summarizing with Meta Al or asking Meta Al to edit someone else's photo.
• Remember that people can still share messages or content in the chat with other people (example: by forwarding) or with Meta (by reporting).
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

How to performantly bulk remove dormant users from a forum?

zipit @zipit@community.nodebb.org

<p>Hey everyone,</p> <p>I am trying to clean out our forum from dormant and spam users. We have roughly 60000 accounts (sic!) of which about 56000 are spam accounts with no posts at all.</p> <p>I have written a small Python script which reaches into our MongoDB database and identifies 'invalid' accounts over a handful criteria such as the user having no posts, URLs in the profile of the user and more. And I can quite accurately sort out spam from legit accounts. The problem is when I just delete these documents and their directly related documents (e.g., for <code>user:100</code> also <code>user:100:emails</code>, <code>user:100:settings</code>, ...) in the Mongo database, then I end up with an at first glance first glance functional NodeBB instance. But secondary data has not been updated as NodeBB does not seem to be very atomic. The users list on the dummy-forum now has for example countless empty pages, as the users are gone but something has not been updated which feeds that user list. I already rebuilt the forum, but this did not change anything.</p> <p>I also had a look at the WriteAPI. I did not (yet) get the bulk user account deletion to work, but when I use the endpoint <code>/api/v3/users/{uid}</code>, my script ends up like this: <code>Processing users: 1%| 320/56329 [11:13&lt;32:23:18, 2.08s/user]</code> I.e., it takes NodeBB about 2 seconds to delete a single user account. And in total this is then more than a day of processing time. I cannot be the first one with this problem, right? I did not find any solutions to this problem. I also found <code>/nodebb/src/api/users.js:processDeletion</code> and the lower level <code>nodebb/src/user/delete.js:User.deleteAccount</code>, but there is no clear path for me which database documents I have to delete and update.</p> <p>Cheers,<br /> zipit</p>

Read more →
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

:blobcatbongokeyboard: Jeju.Social 서버를 마스토돈 버전 4.4.1로 업그레이드했습니다. 특히 모바일에서 브라우저 환경이 많이 개선되었습니다. 모바일 앱에 문제가 있거나 혼란스럽다면 웹 브라우저 버전을 사용해 보세요.

:blobcatbongokeyboard: I upgraded the Jeju.Social server to Mastodon version 4.4.1. The browser experience has improved a lot, especially on mobile. If you're having trouble with your mobile app or are confused, give the web browser version a try.

0
0
1

"A decade ago, our own Ryan McCaffrey gave Alien: Isolation a 5.9 in his review, noting that, among other things, its genuine scares were “diluted by repetition and padding.” He wasn’t alone in that reaction, and other major review outlets gave it similar scores for similar reasons. Today, on its 10th anniversary, I’m here to (once again) respectfully dissent and offer a different perspective: I love Alien: Isolation. It is one of my favourite games of all time. And, even after all these years, it remains a singular, terrifying triumph." HARD AGREE. Loved this game so much. A masterpiece in its genre without a doubt. ign.com/articles/in-defence-of

0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0