What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

1
0
0
0
0

피자와 궁합이 가장 안 좋은 음식은? 구기자 엌ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:5pkonm53a343n3ns24awjzat/post/3max6yrisbk2d

0
0
0

We need general routing method under user domains on . Imagine `boltless.me/cool-repo` directing to tangled repo or `boltless.me/blog-post` directing to leaflet page. Multiple apps might want to take advantage of user domain, so it should be customizable and shouldn't tied to specific app

0
0
0

트위터의 가장 큰 정체성은 강한 익명성에 있다 생각해서 스레드는 트위터와는 방향성이 다를 수밖에 없고 플랫폼 차원에서도 그럴 것 같아요. 스레드는 트위터보단 페이스북의 후계자란 인상.

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ljzdamylhss2omsxax4dpkps/post/3mawwu64wnk27

0
0

제게 케이팝 데몬 헌터스라는 작품이 기획•제작되고 있다는 사실을 알려준 (미애니 매니아) 친구가 케이팝 데몬 헌터스를 보는 동안 나눈 대화 "일본인들은 여태 이거 어떻게 버텼냐” "견뎌! 이거 한국인 자격증 시험이야!" ※ 이 친구는 케이팝 데몬 헌터스 제작 초창기부터 트래킹해오고 있었다고 합니다. 그러니까… 정말 오래 전부터…. (어떻게 알았지)

0
0

🫧

Of all services available to and impact activists, its missed opportunity that @Liberapay does not have channel integration with @Codeberg and the many @forgejo forges that are scattered throughout our creative .

I assume this is contribution thing and this is about who cares a 🪙 dime, and gives 2 cts.

For those interested, here you may find :

codeberg.org/Codeberg/Communit

And perhaps go fedi nativ here:

codeberg.org/fediverse/fediver

0
1

Les articles générés par des humains sont désormais minoritaires sur Internet en comparaison de ceux produits par l#'IA.

Plus de la moitié du trafic web est généré par des systèmes automatisés dont la majorité est mise en place par des acteurs malveillants, d’après une étude d’Imperva.

Il est temps de tirer la sonnette d’alarme sur la désinformation due à l’intelligence artificielle.

web.developpez.com/actu/378613

0
0
0
1

まあ勝手にラベリングされる事の鼻つまみたさにも共感しつつ、わたしは実は令和人文主義が言いたいこと少しわかる(ていうかみんなもそうだからそれなりに過敏反応してるんだと思う)。要するにあれは文章における総合格闘技あるいは護身術のような実用武道を意識しているものを指すのではないか

0

まあ勝手にラベリングされる事の鼻つまみたさにも共感しつつ、わたしは実は令和人文主義が言いたいこと少しわかる(ていうかみんなもそうだからそれなりに過敏反応してるんだと思う)。要するにあれは文章における総合格闘技あるいは護身術のような実用武道を意識しているものを指すのではないか

0
0
0
0

Ok so I subbed back to Disney+ pretty much only to watch The Muppets Christmas Carol.

But who on Earth told them we needed a live-action/CGI Lilo & Stitch?! Own up!

Already the first few minutes felt wrong. Does it get better?

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

가자지구 엄마들이 자녀의 몸에 이름을 새기는 이유 입력 2025.12.23 07:30 학살의 또 다른 방법, 성폭력 '절멸' 위한 치밀한 계획…재생산 차단, 가족 해체 4·3, 6·25, 베트남전에 이은 '젠더'의 무기화 '위안부' 역사를 기억한다면, 가자를 외면할 수 없다 www.newsnjoy.or.kr/news/article...

가자지구 엄마들이 자녀의 몸에 이름을 새기는 이유

0
3

i implemented Ascon-Hash256 in Amaranth! (as well as laid the groundwork for the rest of Ascon family functions, including Ascon-AEAD128)

it comes at 1268 LUTs for iCE40 in the "compact" configuration, processing an average of 5.3 bit/cycle. a little expensive, but modern and cheaper than many better known alternatives

screenshot of test vectors output by a python process in terminal
0
2
3
2
0

Holy crap what a stat

'Between 2001 and 2014, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan cost the US an estimated $1.5 trillion to $1.7 trillion in direct spending. Global AI spending, according to Gartner, is forecast to reach nearly $1.5 trillion this year, putting today's AI boom in the same cash-burning league as two major wars.'

theregister.com/2025/12/24/ai_

0
0
0
1
0
1

After 15 months of hard work, my dad has finished this impressive model of Minas Tirith! It is 1.4 m high and entirely hand-made out of wood. One of the most time-consuming parts was manually engraving the bricks on all walls and buildings, but this was key to properly convey the huge size of the city. Everything was painted by hand, adding some wear and tear. For a behind-the-scenes look at how he built this check out this video: youtube.com/watch?v=Z1Ywlc8ojjE

A model of a tall fortress city. Buildings are arranged in different circular levels, each smaller than the one below, like a wedding cake. All levels are crowded with lots of different buildings and towers of various sizes, giving the city a busy look. On the top level there's a palace and a tall spire. There's a huge flat rocky spur slicing the city in half. The buildings and rocks are mostly white. The model rests on a table, with some tools visible in the background.
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
0

RE: mendeddrum.org/@fanf/115791581

A thing that's been annoying me in tech jargon: "VPN" means two very different things.

1. A piece of restricted network address space, which only authorised people can access.
2. A way to access public network resources indirectly, forwarding via an intermediary.

They both _work_ in more or less the same way: encapsulate inner IP traffic via cryptography and framing, re-send it over the public Internet, verify and decrypt on arrival. They differ in what's done with the traffic after decryption. So it makes sense from that point of view that they share an acronym: the acronym describes the mechanics of what the software is doing. In some cases the same software tool is flexible enough to do either job.

But in spite of that, they're very different in what they're used for. Moreover, they don't really interpret the acronym in the same way: "private" is doing very different work in the two cases, and so is "network".

In sense 1, "network" means a specific _area_ of the network – an address space full of clients and servers. And it's private in the sense of "not public": not everyone is allowed to use that network at all.

But in sense 2, "network" doesn't refer to clients and servers at all, but to the transport in between them. And "private" doesn't mean the network _is_ private, it means it preserves _your_ privacy.

This ambiguity can actually confuse! The blog post linked from the quoted toot starts off by saying "the US government is coming down hard on VPNs". I initially assumed it meant sense 2: the spooks want to eavesdrop, so they're against people using tools that make it harder. Seemed very plausible, given the current state of the crypto wars. But in fact it's talking about sense 1: they think you shouldn't be relying on restricted-access address spaces to keep your network resources secure (instead you should secure each one well enough that it would be safe even if an attacker did get in to the private network).

It's too late to say that "VPN" means only one of these two things. But maybe it's not too late to invent a pair of more specific words, to distinguish the two senses without having to write a whole clarifying extra sentence.

0
0
0
1