What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

1
1
1
2
ChatGPTを使うとバカになるのか? - GIGAZINE
https://gigazine.net/news/20260102-is-chatgpt-making-us-stupid/
フレンチ氏は、人間の知能を置き換えるために生成AIを使うのではなく、知能を拡張するために生成AIを使うべきだと主張しています。たとえば、ChatGPTに何かを尋ねて、その応答を見て満足してしまうのではなく、ChatGPTの応答を起点として新たな思考を切り開くといった使い方をすれば、自らの知識や能力をさらに拡張することができます。
これはとても同意
出力を鵜呑みにする人は知性が低下していくと思うけど、
調査etcの入口として使って思考を深めていく使い方があるべき姿よね
そのためには出力の内容を精査・考察できるだけの知識が必要
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
ChatGPTを使うとバカになるのか? - GIGAZINE
https://gigazine.net/news/20260102-is-chatgpt-making-us-stupid/
フレンチ氏は、人間の知能を置き換えるために生成AIを使うのではなく、知能を拡張するために生成AIを使うべきだと主張しています。たとえば、ChatGPTに何かを尋ねて、その応答を見て満足してしまうのではなく、ChatGPTの応答を起点として新たな思考を切り開くといった使い方をすれば、自らの知識や能力をさらに拡張することができます。
これはとても同意
出力を鵜呑みにする人は知性が低下していくと思うけど、
調査etcの入口として使って思考を深めていく使い方があるべき姿よね
そのためには出力の内容を精査・考察できるだけの知識が必要
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
2

@Em0nM4stodonEm :official_verified: I'm sure this will make me a pariah, but hell. I just had (an LLM) diagnose a hardware issue in a laptop I've been suffering with for two years, after trying to ask around and getting ignored even on their official Discord.

I know all of the ethical issues, but I feel like I'm having a different experience than what everyone else is describing.

As someone whose experience of the world is consistently being ignored when I reach out for help, what do I do? This actually worked.

@trashwizardmidnight posting Not trying to do the pariah thing. But I do want to engage on this question: this was personally useful for you and basically no one else. And it burned dog knows how much resources to produce that result. How valuable does that result have to be in order to justify that resource expenditure?

The burning of fossil fuels for the electricity and the water usage is a one-way process. It can’t be restored or renewed. (Renewable energy could be used, but in practice it isn’t because there isn’t enough) If everyone justified their own personal use without taking into account the costs on society, we will just burn the planet.

Even if it DOES work in some instance, is it reasonable for each person to make this individual choice and leave the collective society to deal with the aggregated consequences? Does the individual have any obligation to think about the collective, or is all the AI use OK as long as each individual finds their individual results useful? How much AI prompting and energy use and so on is OK?

Individuals can’t even know how much energy is being used because the shady AI companies won’t be honest.
How do we expect individuals to make this decision? Or do we all just ignore it and do what we want?

I’m asking in a bit of an inflammatory way, but it’s a legit question.
@Em0nM4stodonEm :official_verified:

0
0
0
0
0
0
1

“우리가 쿠팡을 탈퇴하는 것 이상의 가치관을 원해야 하는 이유다. 쿠팡 없어도 살겠더라 수준에서 더 나아가야 한다. 우리가 로켓배송의 연료였음을 인정하고, 이 사회가 무엇을 불태워 이토록 빨라졌는지를 성찰해야 한다.”
pressian.com/pages/articles/20

0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

If you use an AI-generated image for your article/post, this indicates to me you might have also used AI-generated text.

If you use AI-generated text for your article/post then:

1- I have no idea if you verified the veracity of any claimed facts.

2- I have no idea what your own voice is.

3- I have no idea if this truly expresses your own views, and if you even cared to read it.

4- I have no idea what your intention is with this, other than exploiting my attention and clicks with the least amount of efforts on your part.

5- This shows me you have no respect at all for the labour that was stolen to build these tools, exploiting millions of artists and writers to make billions of dollars without any compensation to them whatsoever.

Why would I want to engage with any content like that?

• I don't want to communicate with a machine (I can do that by myself).

• I don't want to participate in this disgusting exploitation of artists and writers.

• And I want to communicate with another human, of course.

If your intention isn't to communicate with another human, then stop deceiving them making them think they are :no_ai:

@Em0nM4stodonEm :official_verified: Ages ago a colleague posted something on linked in that was AI generated and he was talking about how great it was. So I read it and pointed out a bunch of obvious mistakes and gaps. Rather than engage with that, he generated some AI bullshit response to me and posted that. I stopped engaging.

If I wanted ChatGPT’s opinion on something I can type the question myself. I do not need an educated person to set aside all their education, type into the chat bot and copy/paste its response. I could do that my damn self if that’s what I wanted. I don’t need a typing assistant.

0

I offer Cassandra's Complete Class Theorem¹.

All "good use cases for AI" break down into one of four categories:

I. Bad use case.
II. Good use case, but not something AI can do.
III. Good use case, but it's already been done without AI.
IV. Not AI in the LLMs and GANs sense, but in the sense of machine learning, statistical inference, or other similarly valid things AI boosters use to shield from critique.

wandering.shop/@xgranade/11576

___
¹Not actually a theorem.

0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0