What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0

好奇問問看,請各位自評:5年後,你的發文是否有可能被別人認為是AI文呢?
這既問你對AI能力的預測,也問你對自己「不可取代」性的自信。也歡迎留下詳細的回答,例如:我不可能被認為是AI發文,AI文一定沒我這麼廢。

0
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
1
0

【分散式文學 Diversitas 創刊號】主題徵稿

分散式文學 Diversitas正式開始徵稿了!

創刊號的主題:在狂烈的熱情與偏執的癖好之間,取中庸之道,是「興趣」。烹飪、畫畫、散步、棋藝、編織……您和您的興趣的故事,可以跟我們分享嗎?
投稿方式:私訊本帳號
語言:以正體中文(官話白話文)和臺灣本土語言為主
形式:不拘
篇幅:300-3000(詩無下限)
截稿日期:02/28 23:59 UTC+8
詳細請看:notion.so/Diversitas-2e77d3d45

0
1
1
1

美眾院共和黨推《禁止內幕交易法案》,全面禁止國會議員買股 tw.stock.yahoo.com/news/美眾院共和黨

0
1
1

huh. apparently! blowing on the edge of a bottle to make it whistle (turbulent airstream excitation of a Helmholtz resonator) has a sufficiently repeatable maximum amplitude (for a given shape and size of bottle) that it can be used as a rough volume/SPL calibration technique, for e.g. calibrating smartphone microphones for noise sampling purposes or hearing tests. this study claims a standard deviation of 3.0 dB SPL. interesting!

tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10

0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
2
0
1
0
1

@xgranadeCassandra Granade 🏳️‍⚧️ Agree that copyright is a blunt tool, but if we really care about this, shouldn't we legally disallow it, rather than telling people "you're an asshole if you do so"?

I understand that the concern in doing so would be in moving away from a laissez-faire license like the MIT, which could then make redistribution of the software more difficult (Linux distro might not want to include it, etc.) but... Maybe we should bite the bullet and just do it?

Of course, in a few cases it might...

@berdario @xgranadeCassandra Granade 🏳️‍⚧️

Agree that copyright is a blunt tool, but if we really care about this, shouldn't we legally disallow it, rather than telling people "you're an asshole if you do so"?

No. Social pressure works far better than laws / contracts for enforcing behaviour. Laws work best when they reflect the consensus of acceptable behaviour and provide a structure for dealing with outliers. Contracts work best when they describe the intent of both parties and provide a structure for handling misunderstandings or inability of one party to do as they intended.

When laws don’t reflect consensus, you get widespread civil disobedience.

If you put something like this in a license, you get people lying about using AI, or you drive people away from the project because you’ve accidentally blocked a use case that you’d actually be fine with due to poor legalese.

If you make it socially unacceptable for people to use these tools, you cut off word-of-mouth advertising and make it hard for companies that endorse these things to hire.

This is a lesson that copyleft advocates would benefit from learning.

0

基本ネガティブに考えがちなんだけども、良い方に捉えなおしたり乗り越えられるマインドがあるからこそここまで生きてこられたのかなと思っているから総合的にはポジティブなのではないかという自己評価をしている​:tanuki_daradara:

1
0

美眾院共和黨推《禁止內幕交易法案》,全面禁止國會議員買股 tw.stock.yahoo.com/news/美眾院共和黨

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
0
1
0