What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0

案内が郵送されてきたので、大阪5区の期日前投票に行ってきた。

大阪市と大阪府の投票は、白票だと信任になるので、拒否したいと申し出たら、ちゃんとスキップさせてくれた。

国民審査もできたし、満足した。

0
0
0

ユーザから自由を奪うタイプのセキュリティソリューションが本質的に (場合によっては思想的に) 自由ソフトウェアのシステムと相性が悪すぎるというのがある。
もちろんユーザと非ユーザ (あるいは明確に意図された行動と、自動化されていて必ずしもユーザの明示的な意図によらない反応) を区別できるなら後者に制限を課すことができるが、じゃあ区別できるんですかというとまあ難しいし、不用心なユーザは得てして自らその境界を壊して「何やってるか知らんけど俺が直接やっている扱いにしといてくれ」などとやりだす

0

How Systems Lose Touch With Reality

Many governments, companies, and public institutions are not failing because people are evil or stupid. They are failing because they have shifted their attention toward preventing visible breakdowns instead of learning whether the system is actually working. When that shift happens, systems stop asking whether they are right and start asking whether they are safe in the moment. To cope with that pressure, they rely on familiar words and routines that feel calming and authoritative. Over time, those words begin to substitute for real understanding and real feedback. At first this helps people coordinate. Eventually it becomes a liability.

A symbol becomes load bearing when it takes on work that reality should be doing. Instead of evidence, measurement, or accountability guiding decisions, a word or label fills that role. You can see this when questioning the word is treated as dangerous, when invoking it ends debate, when it moves power or money faster than facts, or when it replaces learning with enforcement. At that point the system depends on the symbol itself in order to function.

This pattern shows up repeatedly across institutions. Security matters when there are real threats, but it becomes harmful when the label is used to avoid asking whether actions actually make anyone safer. Once something is called a security issue, evidence often stops mattering. Stability also sounds positive, but in practice it often means that nothing is allowed to change. Systems begin protecting their current shape rather than their long term ability to survive, and anything that introduces learning or uncertainty is treated as reckless.

Rules and compliance are necessary, but trouble starts when following procedures replaces judgment. People continue to obey processes even when those processes are clearly failing, and doing the right thing becomes impossible if it does not fit the rulebook. Expert knowledge is valuable as well, yet it becomes dangerous when it cannot be questioned or updated. In uncertain situations, disagreement carries useful information. When disagreement is punished, the system loses its ability to correct itself.

Metrics and scores feel objective, but they only capture part of reality. When organizations optimize for numbers instead of outcomes, appearances improve while real conditions worsen. Everything looks fine on paper until it fails. Words like efficiency and innovation often justify cutting safety margins, time, and redundancy. Short term gains are rewarded even when they make the system fragile, and when problems finally appear, they tend to appear suddenly and severely. Neutrality and objectivity are frequently used to avoid responsibility. Decisions are framed as technical or inevitable rather than chosen, and when harm occurs no one is accountable because the system is said to have decided.

Trying to ban or remove these words usually makes things worse. When a system feels threatened, it clings more tightly to whatever keeps it stable. If symbols are stripped away without replacing the function they serve, the system responds by tightening control and becoming more rigid. This is why fights over language rarely solve the underlying problem.

What helps instead is not destroying symbols but preventing them from replacing reality. That happens when words are forced to connect to consequences. Claims about safety have to be checked against real outcomes. Claims about stability have to include long term risks. Claims about expertise have to allow challenge and correction. Metrics have to reflect what people actually experience. Decision makers have to remain responsible for results. If a word carries power, it must also carry responsibility. When words are required to prove themselves through evidence and accountability, they stop holding the system together on their own and return to being tools rather than foundations.

Reality does not care what we call things. Language can be controlled, disagreement can be punished, and obedience can be enforced, but consequences still arrive. Systems still hit limits. Feedback still exists even when it is ignored. Healthy systems stay in contact with reality, while unhealthy systems focus on managing appearances. Restoring that contact is not rebellion or persuasion. It is maintenance. That is how systems recover the ability to change, learn, and survive.

0
0
0

Boah, ist das spannend!

Es wird allgemein behauptet, dass Leo Kanner und Hans Asperger diejenigen gewesen seien, die in den 40ern erstmalig wissenschaftlich beschrieben haben.

Stimmt aber nicht. 20 Jahre zuvor hat eine russische Psychiaterin sehr genau und akribisch das autistische Verhalten von Mädchen und Jungs beobachtet und beschrieben. Ihr Name war Grunja Sucharewa.

Als Frau, die in der frühen UdSSR arbeitete und forschte, wurde sie von der männlich geprägten westlichen Wissenschaft komplett ignoriert.

de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grunja_J

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Everyone has a story about cancer.

A parent.
A friend.
A loved one.

In 2024 alone, there were 2.7 million new cancer cases diagnosed and 1.3 million cancer-related deaths.

This is why prevention, early detection, care, and research matter, and why we have invested €2.7 billion here.

Today, on World Cancer Day, we mark 5 years of Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan.

We are investing and working with hundreds of partners to build a healthier Europe. 🎗️

Find out more: link.europa.eu/7tFbcB

Purple graphic with bold text reading ‘Cancer Knows No age. No gender. No border.’ The words ‘Cancer’ and ‘Knows’ are highlighted in darker purple boxes. A small European Union flag icon appears in the bottom-right corner.
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0

커뮤 첫날에 밤새는 문화 누가 만든거야ㅠ 너무 힘들어 안해 오후 10시에 인트로+개장 하고 새벽 2시부터 새벽6시까지 통금걸어(그래서 헴 커뮤 트위터로 열때는 늘 새벽 통금이 있었음)

0
0

풍력 보기 싫다는 트럼프, 법원은 “계속 지어라” 2일(현지 시간) 연방법원은 덴마크 에너지 기업 외르스테드가 뉴욕주 해안에서 추진 중인 ‘선라이즈 윈드(Sunrise Wind)’가 공사를 재개할 수 있다고 결정했다. 워싱턴 D.C. 연방지방법원의 로이스 램버스(Royce Lamberth) 판사 판단이다. 이 결정은 최근 3주 동안 같은 사안에서 트럼프 행정부가 다섯 번째로 패한 판결로 기록됐다. 결과적으로 연방 수역에서 추진되던 5개 해상풍력 프로젝트 모두가 ‘다시 가라’는 사법부의 허가를 받게 됐다.

풍력 보기 싫다는 트럼프, 법원은 “계속 지어라”

0

풍력 보기 싫다는 트럼프, 법원은 “계속 지어라”

2일(현지 시간) 연방법원은 덴마크 에너지 기업 외르스테드가 뉴욕주 해안에서 추진 중인 ‘선라이즈 윈드(Sunrise Wind)’가 공사를 재개할 수 있다고 결정했다. 워싱턴 D.C. 연방지방법원의 로이스 램버스(Royce Lamberth) 판사 판단이다. 이 결정은 최근 3주 동안 같은 사안에서 트럼프 행정부가 다섯 번째로 패한 판결로 기록됐다. 결과적으로 연방 수역에서 추진되던 5개 해상풍력 프로젝트 모두가 ‘다시 가라’는 사법부의 허가를 받게 됐다. fortunekorea.co.kr/news/articl

0

국힘이 발의한 대구경북통합 특별법이라는데 지역 기업 상속세 면제나 내국인 카지노 설치 권한, 모든 세금 면제 등은... 저 동네에 친척도 많고 그렇지만 이제 거의 분리주의에 가깝지 않나 싶은 생각도. 지역토호 귀족주의를 더한. 정말로 끔찍한 일이고, 북한하고 뭐가 다른가 싶다.

0
0

「でっかいことしたい」って言っちゃったけど、
確かにそうかもやけど、それ以上に
振り返った時に良い思い出に残るような人生を歩みたいよ

仕事も、趣味も

1

아니근데 진짜임 한국 포트럭은 포트 럭 아니고 걍 4트럭임 유일한 식량 공급원처럼 마련해옴... 님들을 내가 잘 먹이고 살려 살지우겠다는 어떠한 부양 의지마저 느껴짐

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7in4bguc3ytim72shzb4xbcz/post/3mdz5drn7pk23

0

:ddingddong:
하 진짜 마이너 스케일 상 왕도진행같은 뻔한 코드 진행 가다가 홀수박에 갑자기 세컨더리 도미넌트로 메이저 코드 빰 나오고 그 뒤에 sus4 - maj7 가는 진행 왜케 좋냐

0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

“What the War on Iran Is Really About”

by Liz Loh-Taylor in Liz Loh-Taylor Bearing Witness on Substack

@palestine@fedibird.comPalestine_Group
@Palestine@masto.aiPalestine فلسطين :verified:
@palestine@lemmy.ml
@usaUnited States | News & Politics

“Recent reporting suggests Israeli officials have conveyed to the United States that Israel could absorb even a worst-case Iranian retaliation of around 700 ballistic missiles if it led to regime collapse in Tehran. Let that sentence sit for a moment”

open.substack.com/pub/lizlohta

0

“What the War on Iran Is Really About”

by Liz Loh-Taylor in Liz Loh-Taylor Bearing Witness on Substack

@palestine@fedibird.comPalestine_Group
@Palestine@masto.aiPalestine فلسطين :verified:
@palestine@lemmy.ml
@usaUnited States | News & Politics

“Recent reporting suggests Israeli officials have conveyed to the United States that Israel could absorb even a worst-case Iranian retaliation of around 700 ballistic missiles if it led to regime collapse in Tehran. Let that sentence sit for a moment”

open.substack.com/pub/lizlohta

0
0
0
0
0

위의 이야기는 한 단면이고 반대로... 웃픈점은 지금 내가 있는 블랙회사에서는 언어모델이나 ML 관련 경험있는 사람이 충분히 없음;; 만성적인 인력 부족... 회사가 사람을 더 뽑아야하는데 예산을 충분히 안주거나 그냥 사람이 없음...;;

0

요새 보면 일론이 굴리는 회사들도 그렇고 아마존도 그렇고 지금 많은 회사들이 치킨 게임하는것 같긴함 아마존이 이번에 사람 엄청 쳐낸것도 AI 개발 및 유지 비용 보태려는것 같던데 미친거 같음;; 즉 빅테크 회사도 지금 총력전하는거라 앞으로 필수인력 혹은 뭔가 정말 뛰어난 기록을 가진 증명된 사람 아니면 짤릴수 있다 라는것...

0
0
1
0