What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

1
0

@w3cWorld Wide Web Consortium
The RDF version of SKOS [1] does not contain a licensing information, other than e.g. SSN [2] or DCAT3 [3]. Is it permitted to distribute (parts of) it and under which conditions? Does the W3C Software license [4] or the W3C Document license [5] apply to it, and if yes, which version? Could a licensing statement be added?

1. w3.org/2009/08/skos-reference/
2. w3.org/ns/ssn/ssn.rdf
3. w3.org/ns/dcat3.ttl
4. w3.org/copyright/software-lice
5. w3.org/copyright/document-lice

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

가끔 하는 이야기지만 당신이 25년 경력의 오타쿠 내지는 덕후라고 하더라도 2020년대 인간들의 덕질에 대해선 아무것도 모를 수 있음. .............

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:a6qvfkbrohedqy3dt6k5mdv6/post/3mdzhmlls5227

0
0
0

Orte

Ist Neumünster ein Ort?
Und der Bahnhofsplatz?

Sind Bahnhöfe Orte oder eher Nicht-Orte? Oder etwas dazwischen?

Bekomme ich an sonem Nicht-Ort eine Nicht-Torte aus einer Nicht-Bäckerei?

Ist eine Bahn ein Ort? Die Strecke - ein langgezogener Ort?

Was ist mit dem Waggon Nr. 4223, ist das ein Ort? Ein mobiler Ort, der sich mal hier, mal da aufhält??

Mobil sind eigentlich alle Orte auf der Erde, brausen sie doch irre schnell im Kreis durchs Weltall.

Was auch Probleme bei Zeitreisen macht.

0

AMD 어닝 콜에서 밸브의 스팀 머신이 올해 초에 발매될 거라는 이야기도 있었나 본데 루머대로 가격이 책정돼도 지금 상황에선 꽤 인기가 있을 것 같다. 메모리 때문에 PC 가격이 너무 올라서 적당히 수급만 잘되면 게이머가 되었든 일반 데스크톱 고객이 되었든 인기가 높을 것 같다는 생각이 든다.

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0

if you search for my name among that huge pile of documents that now show how everyone wanted to hang out with him, you get several hits. Several PDFs that contain the curl license, for various software products it seems.

I assume this is exactly how I easily get into trouble. Like sometimes when trying to travel... 😕

0
0
0
0

We're working on live public transport schedules as the first step to public transport routing. Here is the helper web app that shows currently supported GTFS feeds in different countries and cities and helps to match bus/tram/train stops from OpenStreetMap.org with stops from GTFS: gtfs-osm-matcher.organicmaps.a
If you are interested in public transport schedules in your city, please let us know about feeds for your place/country, and help by adding/editing stops in OpenStreetMap.org

Bus stops in Germany that are present in GTFS, but not present in OpenStreetMap.org
0
0
0
0
0
0

Orte

Ist Neumünster ein Ort?
Und der Bahnhofsplatz?

Sind Bahnhöfe Orte oder eher Nicht-Orte? Oder etwas dazwischen?

Bekomme ich an sonem Nicht-Ort eine Nicht-Torte aus einer Nicht-Bäckerei?

Ist eine Bahn ein Ort? Die Strecke - ein langgezogener Ort?

Was ist mit dem Waggon Nr. 4223, ist das ein Ort? Ein mobiler Ort, der sich mal hier, mal da aufhält??

Mobil sind eigentlich alle Orte auf der Erde, brausen sie doch irre schnell im Kreis durchs Weltall.

Was auch Probleme bei Zeitreisen macht.

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

영월군 "고품질 재활용품 분리배출 활성화":
일회용품 사용과 폐기물 배출을 줄이려는 움직임이 곳곳에서 이어지는 가운데, 지자체들도 자원순환 정책 강화에 나서고 있다. 이런 가운데 강원 영월군이 투명페트병 무인회수기 확대에 적극 나서고 있다.영월군은 최근 “고품질 재활용품 분리배출을 활성화하고 탄소중립 실천을 확산하기 위해 투명페트병 무인회수기를 확대 설치한다”고 밝혔다.영월군에 따르면 현재 영월읍 내에 투명페트병 무인회수기 10대를 설치·운영 중이다. 군은 영월읍 외 다른 읍·면 지역으로 확대해 총 16대를 추가 설치할 계획이다. 군 전역에서 보다 편리하게 투명페트병을 분리배
newspenguin.com/news/articleVi
(2026-02-04 17:00:21)

0
0

案内が郵送されてきたので、大阪5区の期日前投票に行ってきた。

大阪市と大阪府の投票は、白票だと信任になるので、拒否したいと申し出たら、ちゃんとスキップさせてくれた。

国民審査もできたし、満足した。

0
0
0

ユーザから自由を奪うタイプのセキュリティソリューションが本質的に (場合によっては思想的に) 自由ソフトウェアのシステムと相性が悪すぎるというのがある。
もちろんユーザと非ユーザ (あるいは明確に意図された行動と、自動化されていて必ずしもユーザの明示的な意図によらない反応) を区別できるなら後者に制限を課すことができるが、じゃあ区別できるんですかというとまあ難しいし、不用心なユーザは得てして自らその境界を壊して「何やってるか知らんけど俺が直接やっている扱いにしといてくれ」などとやりだす

0

How Systems Lose Touch With Reality

Many governments, companies, and public institutions are not failing because people are evil or stupid. They are failing because they have shifted their attention toward preventing visible breakdowns instead of learning whether the system is actually working. When that shift happens, systems stop asking whether they are right and start asking whether they are safe in the moment. To cope with that pressure, they rely on familiar words and routines that feel calming and authoritative. Over time, those words begin to substitute for real understanding and real feedback. At first this helps people coordinate. Eventually it becomes a liability.

A symbol becomes load bearing when it takes on work that reality should be doing. Instead of evidence, measurement, or accountability guiding decisions, a word or label fills that role. You can see this when questioning the word is treated as dangerous, when invoking it ends debate, when it moves power or money faster than facts, or when it replaces learning with enforcement. At that point the system depends on the symbol itself in order to function.

This pattern shows up repeatedly across institutions. Security matters when there are real threats, but it becomes harmful when the label is used to avoid asking whether actions actually make anyone safer. Once something is called a security issue, evidence often stops mattering. Stability also sounds positive, but in practice it often means that nothing is allowed to change. Systems begin protecting their current shape rather than their long term ability to survive, and anything that introduces learning or uncertainty is treated as reckless.

Rules and compliance are necessary, but trouble starts when following procedures replaces judgment. People continue to obey processes even when those processes are clearly failing, and doing the right thing becomes impossible if it does not fit the rulebook. Expert knowledge is valuable as well, yet it becomes dangerous when it cannot be questioned or updated. In uncertain situations, disagreement carries useful information. When disagreement is punished, the system loses its ability to correct itself.

Metrics and scores feel objective, but they only capture part of reality. When organizations optimize for numbers instead of outcomes, appearances improve while real conditions worsen. Everything looks fine on paper until it fails. Words like efficiency and innovation often justify cutting safety margins, time, and redundancy. Short term gains are rewarded even when they make the system fragile, and when problems finally appear, they tend to appear suddenly and severely. Neutrality and objectivity are frequently used to avoid responsibility. Decisions are framed as technical or inevitable rather than chosen, and when harm occurs no one is accountable because the system is said to have decided.

Trying to ban or remove these words usually makes things worse. When a system feels threatened, it clings more tightly to whatever keeps it stable. If symbols are stripped away without replacing the function they serve, the system responds by tightening control and becoming more rigid. This is why fights over language rarely solve the underlying problem.

What helps instead is not destroying symbols but preventing them from replacing reality. That happens when words are forced to connect to consequences. Claims about safety have to be checked against real outcomes. Claims about stability have to include long term risks. Claims about expertise have to allow challenge and correction. Metrics have to reflect what people actually experience. Decision makers have to remain responsible for results. If a word carries power, it must also carry responsibility. When words are required to prove themselves through evidence and accountability, they stop holding the system together on their own and return to being tools rather than foundations.

Reality does not care what we call things. Language can be controlled, disagreement can be punished, and obedience can be enforced, but consequences still arrive. Systems still hit limits. Feedback still exists even when it is ignored. Healthy systems stay in contact with reality, while unhealthy systems focus on managing appearances. Restoring that contact is not rebellion or persuasion. It is maintenance. That is how systems recover the ability to change, learn, and survive.

0
0
0

Boah, ist das spannend!

Es wird allgemein behauptet, dass Leo Kanner und Hans Asperger diejenigen gewesen seien, die in den 40ern erstmalig wissenschaftlich beschrieben haben.

Stimmt aber nicht. 20 Jahre zuvor hat eine russische Psychiaterin sehr genau und akribisch das autistische Verhalten von Mädchen und Jungs beobachtet und beschrieben. Ihr Name war Grunja Sucharewa.

Als Frau, die in der frühen UdSSR arbeitete und forschte, wurde sie von der männlich geprägten westlichen Wissenschaft komplett ignoriert.

de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grunja_J

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Everyone has a story about cancer.

A parent.
A friend.
A loved one.

In 2024 alone, there were 2.7 million new cancer cases diagnosed and 1.3 million cancer-related deaths.

This is why prevention, early detection, care, and research matter, and why we have invested €2.7 billion here.

Today, on World Cancer Day, we mark 5 years of Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan.

We are investing and working with hundreds of partners to build a healthier Europe. 🎗️

Find out more: link.europa.eu/7tFbcB

Purple graphic with bold text reading ‘Cancer Knows No age. No gender. No border.’ The words ‘Cancer’ and ‘Knows’ are highlighted in darker purple boxes. A small European Union flag icon appears in the bottom-right corner.
0
0
0
1
0
0