FR#153 โ What does a Discord replacement look like?
Discord has announced plans to age-verify all users globally next month, as age verification laws around the globe are taking root. As many people understand the open social web in a form of contrast with Big Tech platforms, seeing it as a refuge from enshittification, this led to another round of conversations on what alternatives there actually are for Discord.
The closest option as a Discord alternative is Matrix, who posted a blog โWelcoming Discord users amidst the challenge of Age Verificationโ. In it, Matrix co-founder Matthew Hodgson describes plainly how Matrix is beneficial as an open standard, but that this does not fully prevent people from avoiding age verification laws: โThe biggest difference between Matrix and Discord is that Matrix is an open standard, like email or the Web. Thereโs a wide range of both clients and servers, and anyone can run their own server on their own terms while participating in the global Matrix network. However, itโs important to note that server admins are still subject to the law in the jurisdiction where they operate. Practically speaking, that means that people and organisations running a Matrix server with open registration must verify the ages of users in countries which require it.โ
Another part that stands out to me is how Hodgson is open about how the client ecosystem for Matrix is limited: โMeanwhile no other organisation stepped up to focus on the โcommunication tool for communitiesโ use case and provide a production ready Discord alternative, but clients like Cinny or Commet may feel much closer to Discord.โ
PieFed is also trying to get a piece of the Discord user base Pie, and also wrote a blog post explicitly positioning itself as a Discord alternative. At this point, people making posts on microblogging sites complaining that Discord should not be used for documentation is practically a meme, but does get at a real frustration that all sorts of features that should not be chat-based are being used by a chat platform. PieFed makes this case explicitly, describing itself as having โall the advantages that traditional forums have over Discordโ, and additionally having โcommunity building featuresโ, such as wikis, events, private groups, and StackOverflow-like questions-and-answers.
This gets at a familiar problem across the open social web: people active in the ecosystem can clearly see how these open protocols can be used to replace Big Tech platforms, but the gap between that potential and a polished, complete alternative remains wide. Matrix can handle real-time chat, PieFed can handle forums, but neither on its own offers the full bundle of features that makes Discord sticky.
Searching for a single Discord alternative may be asking the wrong question however. Discord itself is an extensive bundle of functions smashed together: real-time chat, persistent forums and documentation, voice chats, events and even games. Rather than replicating that bundle in a single app, the open social web may be converging on a different model entirely, where specialised services handle specific functions while sharing identity and social connections across protocol boundaries. These individual services themselves do not have to share the same protocol underneath, and may actually work better if they donโt, with each protocol handling the part it is best designed for. Several developments this week illustrate what this composable model looks like in practice.
Germ, an E2EE messaging app for iOS that uses atprotoโs identity system, has been in beta with atproto integration since August. But this week, both Blacksky and Bluesky shipped native Germ buttons directly on user profiles, meaning users can now launch into encrypted conversations straight from the apps they already use. Germ uses MLS for its encryption and atproto handles as its account system, so users can message each other without needing a separate account or phone number. The significant part is less the feature and more the product decision behind it, as rather than building end-to-end encrypted messaging into their own apps, both Bluesky and Blacksky are now using a third-party service that shares the same identity layer. Germ has also published implementation guidelines for any atproto developer to integrate the same functionality.
Standard.site is a set of atproto lexicons for long-form writing, designed collaboratively by three independent blogging platforms to ensure their posts are interoperable with each other and with any future platform that adopts the same schema. This kind of cross-project coordination on shared data formats is exactly what the composable model requires to function: not just different apps built on the same protocol, but active collaboration to make sure the building blocks actually fit together. This is also directly relevant to one of the most persistent complaints about Discord: that communities use it for documentation and knowledge that should be persistent and searchable rather than buried in chat history. With a shared lexicon for long-form writing, that content can live across multiple platforms while remaining portable and discoverable through atprotoโs identity infrastructure.
A New Socialโs most recent Bridgy Fed update is about making the bridge between atproto and ActivityPub more functional at the interaction level. Previously, if someone on Mastodon replied to your bridged Bluesky post (or vice versa), youโd get a notification but couldnโt respond without logging into the other platform. Now you can like, repost, reply, or block directly through Bridgy Fed without needing an account on the other side. This kind of interoperability plumbing is easy to overlook, but itโs essential if the multi-protocol ecosystem is going to feel like a coherent experience rather than a collection of disconnected tools.
Taken together, pieces of a composable alternative are starting to appear. BlackSky provides feeds for their community on atproto, Germ adds encrypted messaging as a modular service any atproto app can plug into, Standard.site enables long-form publishing and documentation, PieFed offers forums, wikis, and Q&A through ActivityPub federation, and Matrix handles real-time group chat. None of these apps individually replaces Discord entirely, but collectively they can cover the entire feature set and even go beyond it.
There is an obvious counterargument here: Discord succeeded precisely because having everything in one place is convenient. Asking people to use four different apps instead of one is a real user experience cost, and for many communities the friction of that setup will outweigh the benefits. But the point is less that everyone should adopt this composable model today and more that the building blocks are now being laid. As interoperability between these services improves, the multi-app experience may become seamless enough that it stops feeling like a compromise.
The reason decentralisation matters for something like age verification isnโt just โrun your own server,โ as Hodgson acknowledges that server admins are still subject to local law. Itโs that when your social life isnโt bundled into one platform, no single companyโs policy change can disrupt all of your communication, community, and content at once.
What weโre finding is that for decentralisation to really make an impact, it needs to happen on multiple axes at the same time. There is the decentralisation in the way it is usually understood by communities on ActivityPub and Matrix: from a single centralised server to many decentralised servers run by independent groups. This gives communities autonomy over their own spaces, but each server still replicates the same software and feature set.
There is the decentralisation in the way it is done on atproto: from a single software stack to separating identity, data storage and apps. This means your identity and data arenโt locked to any one application, and different apps can offer different experiences on top of the same underlying infrastructure.
And there is a third axis that is now starting to become visible: the decentralisation of features. Rather than a single app that bundles everything together, like Discord, multiple different apps each specialise in a few things and are interoperable with each other. This is the axis that the developments this week are starting to illustrate, and it may be the one that ultimately matters most for resilience against the kind of platform-wide policy changes that sparked this conversation in the first place.
#nlnet
https://connectedplaces.online/reports/fr153-what-does-a-discord-replacement-look-like/