Search results

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0

:fediverse: の話をするとき、つい「マニアックな SNS やってまして〜」みたいな感じで話してしまう自分がいるんだけど、そう言ってしまいがちな自分に対して最近「別にそんなに過度に知名度に配慮しなくても良いよな」という気持ちになってきている。

「ほとんど知られてないけど、こちとらオープンスターンダード :activitypub: だし!」みたいな気持ちも心の奥底にはあるけど、そもそもオープンスタンダードという事の重要性も世の中的には「だからなに?」っていうひともいるだろうし、そういう思想強めなことを主張したいわけではなくて、

マジョリティーかマイノリティーか、ということをわざわざ自分のほうから気にすることになんの意味があるのか、そんなことを気にする必要はないんじゃないか、という気持ちになってきている、という感じ。

0
0

Is social media its own thing or is it an attention layer for the open web? Is it mostly about these separate things we call posts, or should every piece of writing or audio or video be able to be boosted itself?

I think that's the divide between and . wants to dominate a world of posts like Gmail dominates email etc. Social running on a protocol but one company decides most people's experience. Or should we give the public full control over what media goes viral?

0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0

Types of replies you can expect when talking about :

Well actually…

* …that isn't _activitypub_ that is _mastodon_.

* …that is solved in _mastodon_ therefore it is solved in _activitypub_ (bonus points if it is on the same point that got the previous response).

* …I wrote some code that solves it, it's easy! <code does not, in fact, solve the problem>

* <Insert rant about corporate social media>

* <insert rant about Jack Dorsey>

* <insert rant about threads>

1/

0
0
0

I've been working all day today improving, fixing, and enhancing the comments system in Incise.

- Comments are now correctly listed for fetches
- Comments are now likable from the web UI as well as through
- Comment replies are now as well
- Comments by remote actors (eg. Mastodon users) liked by Incise users are now

An example of the last point, this comment by @ViditbVidit Bhargava on @dezinezyncNikhil Nigade's post: mastodon.social/@Viditb/115960

0

@evan@cosocial.ca 100% agreed on the heavy(-ier) lift that is AP development.

However that's how standalone apps have always been developed, and there is a reason why.

When you rely on someone else's tech, then when they sunset the tech or it otherwise becomes unfavourable, you're fucked (pardon my french)

I've seen entire businesses jump head first into building "Facebook apps" after Farmville exploded. None of them are around now and Zynga is currently worth $8 on the NASDAQ.

cc @res260@infosec.exchange

@julian @evanEvan Prodromou @res260Émilio Gonzalez

Though there is a risk that the ecosystem becomes so much of a straggler that goes the way of bulletin boards and newsreaders (forever niche), overall the slow organic growth and evolution on the fediverse is a good thing. And being the lightning rod for hasty commercial growth-hacking helps keep the ecosystem on that path, able to - in more protected territory - build robust foundations for interoperable standards-based social networking.

0

I love but seeing how slow its development is compared to makes it hard to be excited about it. This goes for both protocol development and ecosystem development.

ATproto has many cool projects popping up every month, the vision is clear and platforms integrate with each other.

I don't see this excitement and work on the ActivityPub side :(

0
0
0
0

Is there such a thing as an spamfilter?

The already has a very heterogeneous software landscape. I'm reading about proposals to add support to as well. But one problem would be common to every implementation: Spam.

And just like MTAs don't each implement their own spam filtering and instead rely on rspamd and spamassassin, I feel like some middleware should exist for ActivityPub as well.

0
0

After months of struggling with the “zombie post” issue on Hackers' Pub—where deleted posts wouldn't disappear from remote servers—I had a sudden hypothesis today. As I dug into it, I realized it's a structural issue with Fedify's MessageQueue system: Create(Note) and Delete(Note) activities can be delivered out of order, causing remote instances to receive Delete(Note) before Create(Note).

The fix will likely require API changes, so this will probably need to wait for 2.0.0.

2

Fediverse Politics, Meta®

Who gets to define the next standard?

> the Working Group requires participants to either be a paid W3C member or to be an Invited Expert. There are only two organisations that are active in the fediverse that are a paid member of the W3C: Meta and the Social Web Foundation. With the Social Web Foundation also receiving funding from Meta [...]

web.archive.org/web/2026011700

(Via archive.org because connectedplaces didn't respond to lynx over Tor.)

0
0
0

Moin @cosmos4uDaniel Fischer, kann ich deinem Blog skyweek.wordpress.com eigentlich auch direkt von hier aus folgen? Welches Handle wäre das?

Wie es gehen müsste, darüber schreiben heise.de/news/Von-WordPress-di (👋 @mhoMartin Holland )

wordpress.com/de/support/teil-

wordpress.com/de/plugins/activ

pmueller.de/wordpress-mit-dem-

johannesmairhofer.de/blog/word

Besonders spannend dabei "Eine der leistungsstärksten Funktionen ist die Möglichkeit, Interaktionen aus dem gesamten Fediverse zu empfangen und anzuzeigen. Wenn jemand auf Mastodon oder einer anderen Fediverse-Plattform deinen Beitrag kommentiert, wird der Kommentar direkt im Bereich für WordPress-Kommentare angezeigt. So entsteht eine nahtlose Unterhaltung zwischen deinem Blog und dem weiteren Fediverse."

0

"Implementing ActivityPub looks simple at first—it’s just JSON over HTTP, right? Then you hit JSON-LD context resolution, HTTP Signature verification that fails on some servers but works on others, and specs spanning hundreds of pages that every implementation interprets differently.

I’ll cover type-safe vocabulary, comprehensive signature support, framework-agnostic design, and the CLI toolchain—plus production stories from Ghost, Hollo, and Hackers’ Pub." -@hongminhee洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

0

We have the pleasure of having @hongminhee.org@bsky.brid.gy洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) who will give a presentation about @fedify@hollo.socialFedify: ActivityPub server framework "an opinionated framework for TypeScript that handles the protocol plumbing" It is an open free event and everyone is welcome!

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:kb4wpu3bfjfvljfjsrt5nxlk/post/3md75oh5umxo2

0
0

On February 3rd (very soon!) I am hosting another [BERLIN FEDERATED NETWORK EXPLORATION CIRCLE] at @offline. It's a chance to meet and talk with people who are interested in the & networking & exploration & circ---you get the idea.

We have the pleasure of having @hongminhee洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary: who will give a presentation about @fedifyFedify: ActivityPub server framework "an opinionated framework for TypeScript that handles the protocol plumbing"

It is an open free event and everyone is welcome!

BERLIN FEDERATED NETWORK EXPLORATION CIRCLE
BEFENEC? BEFENEEXCI?
we have 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) all the way here from 
Korea with a presentation about Fedify, a fediverse
library they have been building that is now powering
the federation of things like Ghost and Hackers' Pub

come join us offline
at offline
Lichtenrader Str. 49
Berlin
1
0
2

Hey! Wanna get a sneak peek at our research project ‘Fediverse Integration into (EU) Public Administration’…?? — Expect ‘A Fantastic FediVariety Circus’ !!!

@FOSDEM Sat 31/01 - Start 15:40 - End 16:00 - Room H.2215 (Ferrer)

fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event

And FULL peek on our research at

NOAW unconference — CfP!
Submit a topic! Get aboard!

"Nodes on a Web: The Fediverse in/for Public Institutions”
Thu/Fri 19/20 March 2026, Amsterdam!

fedivariety.org/unconference

0

Hey! Wanna get a sneak peek at our research project ‘Fediverse Integration into (EU) Public Administration’…?? — Expect ‘A Fantastic FediVariety Circus’ !!!

@FOSDEM Sat 31/01 - Start 15:40 - End 16:00 - Room H.2215 (Ferrer)

fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event

0
0
0
0

@Mastodon

Stop describing the fediverse is Mastodon!

The social platform Fediverse is a collection of volunteer driven knots connected with open source protocols. Protocols are mostly free open source software. Developed by volunteers. Mastodon is one collection of software.

You should promote other software for fediverse also. To keep the idea and the stability of the federated Fediverse.

0

@fedicat @reiver@reiver ⊼ (Charles) :batman:

Unserious of sorts..

How about letting - guided along by some protocol experts to formulate good prompts - maintain and evolve the open standard specs based on all the info the AI has sucked up from all the FOSS projects that are implementing .

(Note that I am wary of AI for a whole host of reasons, mostly all relating to its disruptive introduction and its potential dehumanising effect, eroding social cohesion and connection between people.)

0
0

Fediverse & AI Coding Tools & Vibe Coding

...

I noticed 2 or 3 people lately using AI coding tools to create Fediverse software.

2 of them even seemed to be Vibe Coding.

...

I have been programming for over 30 years. I am probably not going to Vibe Code, but —

I wonder if we should help them.

There are tools we (Fediverse developers) could create to make it so others could Vibe Code Fediverse apps.

0
0
0

Fediverse & AI Coding Tools & Vibe Coding

...

I noticed 2 or 3 people lately using AI coding tools to create Fediverse software.

2 of them even seemed to be Vibe Coding.

...

I have been programming for over 30 years. I am probably not going to Vibe Code, but — I do recognize that it can be empowering to non-programmers

mastodon.social/@reiver/115639

...

0
0

RE: mastodon.social/@fediverserepo

It does feel like has been frozen in amber, maybe this will help. I'm hoping developers get involved or its very hard to see how things will change.

Especially the Live Online Account Portability stuff which just has from the get go.

0
0

2/

To handle public-key cryptography safely, often a user should be able to have multiple public-keys.

For example, a user might have a different public-key on each device, rather than sharing public-keys.

A user might delegate to a 3rd party — and there may be a delegated versus non-delegated public-key distinction.

Key-rotation is also often necessary for safety reasons.

Etc.

...

3/

All that requires that a Fediverse user can have multiple public-keys specified for them.

...

Although w3id.org/security/v1 seems to allow for multiple public-keys —

I wonder how much Fediverse software could actually handle multiple public-keys (rather than just one)?

(And, don't just assume one public-key?)

How mucg Fediverse software could handle public-keys changing over time?

Etc?

0

2/

To handle public-key cryptography safely, often a user should be able to have multiple public-keys.

For example, a user might have a different public-key on each device, rather than sharing public-keys.

A user might delegate to a 3rd party — and there may be a delegated versus non-delegated public-key distinction.

Key-rotation is also often necessary for safety reasons.

Etc.

...

0