What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

I've been honestly adding Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> to every commit where I used an LLM even slightly—whether it's generating test scaffolding, drafting docs, or just bouncing ideas. I thought transparency was the right thing to do. Turns out, people see that trailer and immediately assume the whole thing is “vibe coded” AI slop, no further questions asked. The irony is that being honest about my process is what's getting my work dismissed.

Now I'm genuinely torn. Do I keep the trailer and accept that some people will write off my work at a glance? Or do I drop it and lose something I actually believe in? It's frustrating that there's no widely understood distinction between “I prompted an LLM to write my entire app” and “I used an LLM as a tool while writing my own code.” I don't have an answer yet—just sitting with the discomfort for now.

Adding to this: much of my LLM usage actually goes into writing documentation and communicating in English—a language that isn't mine but that open source essentially demands. For non-native English speakers, LLMs are a genuine equalizer. They let me write docs that don't get ignored for sounding awkward, and participate in discussions without spending twice the effort a native speaker would. But when English-native developers dismiss LLM-assisted writing wholesale, they're not even aware of the privilege baked into that judgment. It's like someone who's never had to do housework scoffing at a washing machine for making people “lazy”—easy to say when the burden was never yours to begin with.

1
1
0
1

I've been honestly adding Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> to every commit where I used an LLM even slightly—whether it's generating test scaffolding, drafting docs, or just bouncing ideas. I thought transparency was the right thing to do. Turns out, people see that trailer and immediately assume the whole thing is “vibe coded” AI slop, no further questions asked. The irony is that being honest about my process is what's getting my work dismissed.

Now I'm genuinely torn. Do I keep the trailer and accept that some people will write off my work at a glance? Or do I drop it and lose something I actually believe in? It's frustrating that there's no widely understood distinction between “I prompted an LLM to write my entire app” and “I used an LLM as a tool while writing my own code.” I don't have an answer yet—just sitting with the discomfort for now.

1
1
2
1

從「她」字用作「She」的對應伊始,關於華語是否需要陰性代名詞的爭論一直都在。在歷史上大多數時間,男性/陽剛視角的觀點一直佔據語言、文字和文化、公共敘事的中心,女性/陰性視角直到近百年才慢慢地受到重視,在這個漫長的過程中,「她」字幫助女性在語言書寫中照見了自身的主體性,女性/陰性經驗在書寫中有了容身之處,也有了在公共話語場域中被看見、肯認的可能。而跨性別/非二元經驗更加邊緣,更少被言說、書寫,在公共場域中被看見、肯認是近四、五十年的事,直到最近Unicode新版本發布,「ㄨ也」字才被正式納入。

粵語字和台語字的發展,也是在尋求自身的主體性。所以,看到「佢」和「伊」被視為中性的代名詞,再照見那些藏在粵語和台語裡的辱女詞彙與性別框架,我想問的是,「佢」和「伊」是否是忽視女性/陰性以及跨性別/非二元主體性的表現?「佢」和「伊」被視為中性的代名詞,是否是無視藏在粵語和台語裡,至今未完全消散的陽剛中心?如果上述問題答案都是「是」,那麼,最後也最重要的問題,粵語、台語需要「姖」、「𡛂/𡜬」,甚或是「ㄨ巨」、「ㄨ尹」字嗎?

0

S pokračováním české muniční iniciativy souhlasí 62 procent Čechů – vyplývá to ze šetření společnosti Kantar pro Českou televizi. Větší podporu má iniciativa mezi voliči opozičních stran.
ℹ️ Rozdílné postoje mají dle výsledků průzkumu voliči vládních stran – mezi podporovateli Motoristů souhlasí dvě třetiny, u hnutí ANO zhruba polovina, u voličů SPD je to 20 procent.
🔗 https://czch.tv/GFYWKC

0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1

A : BC-250에 어떻게든 던파와 리니지를 깔아보려고 발악하고 있어요 Q : 아니, 왜 그런 가시밭길을 걸어가시려 하시나요? A : 친구놈을 꼬득여서 사게 하고 싶거든요. 그 친구의 마지막 심리적 방화벽이 "그거 리니지랑 던파 돌아감?" 이었는데, 이것만 뚫으면 어떻게든 될 것 같아요. Q : ... A : 모바노기는 던파 뚫어보려다가 얼떨결에 실행해본게 된거구요. Q : ...

0

ETTR(Exposing To The Right)를 하니까 색 정보가 제대로 처리되며 채도가 자동 알고리즘으로도 풍부하게 나온다. 지금까지 노출을 과도하게 언더로 찍고 있었다는 이야기인데, 아, 속이 쓰리네. 지금이라도 배웠으니 그나마 다행이다만. 😅

카메라 설정을 갈아엎은 후의 첫 테스트 촬영은 매우 성공적이었다. 상당히 늦은 감이 있지만, 너무 늦지는 않았다고 위안해본다.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exposing_to_the_right

1
0

말이 씨가 되는 사례:

나 코딩 한창 배우던 시절에, 나는 북한산의 정기를 받아 코드를 짠다고 종종 드립쳤는데

그러고 11년 뒤 정말 북한산에 근접한 서울 은평구에 거주하게 됨.

이래서 말은 항상 조심해야 됨.(?)

0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0

Thâu-ke ê âng-pau, koh thê saⁿ koàn tiàm lāi iōng bô oân ê gû-ni--tńg.
頭家的紅包,還拿了三罐店裡沒用完的鮮奶回家。

Thàn--sí--ah, thàn--sí--ah.
賺爛了,賺爛了。
:blobcatmeltthumb:

一個紅包袋中間寫著謹賀新年,及畫著一匹黃色的馬的插畫
0

I wonder what it means for the future that automated moderation, the online panopticon & Silicon Valley puritanism has shaped a generation of kids who are now afraid to type “sex”, “killed”, “death” or “rape” online without substituting numbers for letters or resorting to language like “unalive”

0
1
0