What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0

지난해 공공기관 10곳 중 8곳이 청년고용의무를 이행한 것으로 나타났습니다. 미이행 기관은 인천국제공항공사, 예술의전당, 한국방송광고진흥공사, 한국보건사회연구원 등으로 결원이 부족하거나 사업 축소·경영 효율화로 인한 신규 채용 여력이 부족했던 것으로 나타났습니다.

인천공항·예술의전당, 청년 고용의무 안 지켰다

0

@IngridHbnIngrid Hoeben Ⓥ 🇧🇪 Thank you for sharing this! I have pet giant African landsnails and the way I explain it is the shell is hard, like your fingernails, but it would hurt if someone picked you up by your fingernails too because they're connected to delicate tissue. I'd also add that sometimes touching the shell isn't enough - some of my snails are more cautious than others and retract immediately, whereas with some of the more bold ones you have to (gently!) tap repeatedly. Also they're less likely to go back in if they're eating something they like. It really does show that even creatures as simple as snails have distinct personalities and preferences

0
1
0
0

뉴스기사 읽다보면 개같고불쾌했다는 인터뷰는 그대로 잘 인용해놨는데 결론이 " 이렇게 서점이 젊은이들의 만남의 장소로 탈바꿈되고있다 ^^ " 이렇게끝남 널 좋아해서 괴롭히는거야~용서해줘~^^ 이거랑 뭐가다름

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:gjre7jpbekaspurtrikuwwfn/post/3mfnmadoohc2u

0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
4
0
0
0

연합우주 서버장 분들께… 클라우드플레어의 AI 차단 모드(대충 이런 이름) 켜지 마세요 그거 켜뒀다가 온갖 인스와 연결 끊긴 분들이 한 트럭임

4
0
0

Nothing makes me feel stupider than trying to how to properly jump through Apple's code signing and notarization hoops.

For DREAMM 4.0 I have applied for and received permission for the multicast entitlement. Because this is a restricted entitlement, I apparently need to jump through a bunch of extra steps to enable it for the app.

However, since I'm not in the app store, and I don't use XCode to build, it seems as though there's next to no information out there on how to do it.

Everything seems to point to creating a "provisioning profile", which I have done. But what to do with it after that ... who knows?

At the moment I'm just using codesign with a certificate in my keychain on the binaries, and then notarizing the final package via xcrun notarytool. But this is without the new profile, and my app doesn't have the new entitlement.

I think the provisioning profile needs to be applied at the notarization stage. But every time I think I've found instructions on how to do it, it inevitably leads back to describing how to do it within XCode.

Writing this mostly just to vent, but also a slight hope that maybe someone knows someone who has experience in this area....

0
0
0

(2025-07)AI時代の新たな疲労:なぜ私(たち)は『説明のつかないしんどさ』を抱えているのか - じゃあ、おうちで学べる
syu-m-5151.hatenablog.com/entry/2025/07/16/115510

(2026-02)AIのやりすぎで頭がおかしくなっている - 運河
uiuret.hatenablog.com/entry/2026/02/22/024509

(2026-02)AIのやりすぎで頭がおかしくなることにすら慣れた - 『AIのやりすぎで頭がおかしくなっている』を読んで - じゃあ、おうちで学べる
syu-m-5151.hatenablog.com/entry/2026/02/24/150909

1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0

말 울음소리, 성대로 내는 소리에 휘파람도 추가 (영상) www.dongascience.com/ko/news/76495 "연구팀은 살아 있는 말 10마리에 대한 내시경 촬영에서 이중 발성 메커니즘을 직접 관찰했다. 울음이 시작되면 성대 위쪽 연골이 안쪽으로 모이며 공기 통로가 좁아지고 고주파가 먼저 발생했다. 이후 갑상연골이 기울면서 성대의 진동에 의한 저주파가 추가됐다. 두 주파수 사이에는 뚜렷한 연동 관계가 없어 각각 독립적으로 만들어지는 것으로 나타났다."

말 울음소리, 성대로 내는 소리에 휘파람도 추가

0
1
0
0

샘 올트먼이 인도 AI 서밋에서 "인간도 교육하고 먹이는데 20년이라는 막대한 시간과 자원이 들어가는데 (학습,추론에 들어가는 자원 관련) AI한테 불공평하다고 발언한게 비판 받는 중. 올트먼 인간 vs. AI 비교 발언에 나타난 기술주의자들의 인간관 x.com/atmostbeauti... "실제 인간의 뇌가 문답에 사용하는 에너지는 AI 모델보다도 훨씬 적다. 전체 인류 진화 과정까지 끌어들이는 화법은 특유의 교묘한 논점 이탈이다." AI업계의 현재 시점 AI의 의인화는 계속 비판 받는 중.

Journey on X: "올트먼 인간 vs. AI 비...

0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0

Der Digitale Exitus: Warum Europa jetzt die Ketten sprengen muss

Ein Manifest für die Souveränität

Wir stehen am Abgrund einer technologischen Leibeigenschaft. Während wir uns einbilden, in einer freien Demokratie zu leben, haben wir die Schlüssel zu unserem Haus, unseren Gedanken und unserer Wirtschaft längst an eine Handvoll Milliardäre im Silicon Valley übergeben. Wir sind keine Nutzer mehr. Wir sind Datensätze. Wir sind digitale Leibeigene in einem feudalen System, das keine Grenzen kennt und keine Moral. Es ist Zeit, die rosarote Brille abzusetzen. Es ist Zeit, das Betriebssystem unserer Gesellschaft neu zu installieren. [Mehr lesen...]

christin-loehner.de/blog/der-d

0

3月4日(水)から11日(水)まで東京に滞在します。この機会に日本のフェディバースの皆さんとお会いしたいです。ランチでもディナーでも、お茶やコーヒーでも構いません。私と会ってくださる方はいらっしゃいますか?食事やお茶は私がおごります。私はこの期間中、特に予定がないので、皆さんのご都合に合わせることができます。(ただし、最終日を除きます)

6
1
0

A couple days ago, I got a DM from a user. I happily replied and sent a follow request—but the Accept never came back, even though they hadn't enabled manuallyApprovesFollowers. My DM reply probably never arrived either. Classic interop bug.

I checked out the Bonfire source and dug in. Turns out Bonfire hasn't implemented RFC 9421 yet, so it was silently discarding any activity signed with it. That alone would be workable, except for one more issue: Bonfire was responding 200 OK even when signature verification failed, instead of 401 Unauthorized.

This matters because Fedify implements a double-knocking mechanism—if a request signed with RFC 9421 fails, it retries with the older draft cavage signature. But since Bonfire returned 200 OK on the failed first knock, had no reason to send a second one.

I filed two issues on the Bonfire repo—one requesting RFC 9421 support, and one about returning 401 on invalid signatures. For the latter, I also sent a PR, which got merged pretty quickly: bonfire-networks/activity_pub#9.

That said, individual Bonfire instances won't pick up the fix until they actually deploy it. So in the meantime, I patched Hollo and Hackers' Pub to use draft-cavage-http-signatures-12 as the firstKnock, so Bonfire instances can at least understand the first request.

One last thing: Fedify caches whether a given server supports RFC 9421, and the Bonfire servers I'd already talked to were cached as “supports RFC 9421”—because they'd been returning 200 OK. I had to manually clear that cache on both hollo.social and hackers.pub before everything finally worked.

After all that, the mutual follow went through and my DM reply landed. Worth it.

0
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0

Not, I repeat, my only great failure as a geek.

But, *damn*, that was humiliating.

I wrote an *excellent* program that *brilliantly* displayed data coming from hardware that didn't work.

It was a gig. I got paid. That's not the point. I was a pro, and pro's deliver *value*.

All I delivered was a good laugh.

0
0
0