What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

[랜선효도] 제주감귤🍊 @jejuorange.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy
Public
Shared by 시아란 🌌 Private

유럽 의회, 생성AI의 저작권 침해에 대해 "완전한 투명성"과 "공정 보상"을 요구, 460:71로 권고 채택 xenospectrum.com/eu-parliamen... 1. EU 서비스 AI는 학습이 EU 밖이더라도 EU 저작권법 적용 대상 2. AI학습에 사용한 모든 저작권 보호 작품/제품의 리스트 제공해야 4. 뉴스미디어는 AI학습을 거부할 권리가 인정 + AI혼자 만든 컨텐츠는 저작권 인정 안함

欧州議会、生成AIによる著作権侵害に「完全な透明性」と「公正...

欧州議会、生成AIによる著作権侵害に「完全な透明性」と「公正報酬」を要求：460対71の大差で勧告採択

欧州議会、生成AIによる著作権侵害に「完全な透明性」と「公正報酬」を要求：460対71の大差で勧告採択 | XenoSpectrum

欧州議会が動いた。2026年3月11日（現地時間10日）、欧州議会は生成AIによる著作権保護コンテンツの利用に関する包括的な勧告を、460対71という大差で採択した。188票の棄権があったとはいえ、賛成票が全体の約65%に達したこの結果は、EU立法機関としての政治的意志を明確に示している。

xenospectrum.com · XenoSpectrum

Link author: Y Kobayashi@masapoco@xenospectrum.com

0
0
2
0
2
0
한겨레 @hanibsky.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy
Public
Shared by 시아란 🌌 Private

MBC의 윤석열 전 대통령 ‘바이든-날리면’ 발언 보도에 대해 방송통신심의위원회가 내린 과징금 3천만원 처분을 취소하라는 법원 판결이 나왔습니다.

법원, 윤석열 ‘바이든 날리면’ MBC 보도 과징금 취...

법원, 윤석열 ‘바이든 날리면’ MBC 보도 3천만원 과징금 취소

문화방송(MBC)의 윤석열 전 대통령 ‘바이든-날리면’ 발언 보도에 대해 방송통신심의위원회(방심위)가 내린 과징금 3천만원 처분을 취소하라는 법원 판결이 나왔다. 서울행정법원 행정8부(재판장 양순주)는 11일 문화방송이 방송미디어통신위원회(방미통위)를 상대로 제기한 과

www.hani.co.kr · 한겨레

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Open Rights Group @openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org
Public

Join us for our latest London meet-up!

The ORG team will be there to update you on our campaigns on the Migrant Digital Rights Programme and our calls to reform the ICO.

🗓️ Wednesday 25 March
🕡️ 6:30–10pm GMT
📍 Newspeak House, E2 7DG

Sign up now ⬇️

openrightsgroup.org/events/org

ORG London Meet-up

Join us in London to get the latest on our campaigns on the Migrant Digital Rights Programme and our calls to reform the ICO.

www.openrightsgroup.org · Open Rights Group

0
0
0
0
0
0
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary: @hongminhee@hollo.social
Public
Shared by trending_bot

I'm writing this in English.

Not because English is my first language—it isn't. I'm writing this in English because if I wrote it in Korean, the people I'm addressing would run it through an outdated translator, misread it, and respond to something I never said. The responsibility for that mistranslation would fall on me. It always does.

This is the thing Eugen Rochko's post misses, despite its good intentions.

@GargronEugen Rochko argues that LLMs are no substitute for human translators, and that people who think otherwise don't actually rely on translation. He's right about some of this. A machine-translated novel is not the same as one rendered by a skilled human translator. But the argument rests on a premise that only makes sense from a certain position: that translation is primarily about quality, about the aesthetic experience of reading literature in another language.

For many of us, translation is first about access.

The professional translation market doesn't scale to cover everything. It never has. What gets translated—and into which languages—follows the logic of cultural hegemony. Works from dominant Western languages flow outward, translated into everything. Works from East Asian languages trickle in, selectively, slowly, on someone else's schedule. The asymmetry isn't incidental; it's structural.

@GargronEugen Rochko notes, fairly, that machine translation existed decades before LLMs. But this is only half the story, and which half matters depends entirely on which languages you're talking about. European language pairs were reasonably serviceable with older tools. Korean–English, Japanese–English, Chinese–English? Genuinely usable translation for these pairs arrived with the LLM era. Treating “machine translation” as a monolithic technology with a uniform history erases the experience of everyone whose language sits far from the Indo-European center.

There's also something uncomfortable in the framing of the button-press thought experiment: “I would erase LLMs even if it took machine translation with it.” For someone whose language has always been peripheral, that button looks very different. It's not an abstract philosophical position; it's a statement about whose access to information is expendable.

I want to be clear: none of this is an argument that LLMs are good, or that the harms @GargronEugen Rochko describes aren't real. They are. But a critique of AI doesn't become more universal by ignoring whose languages have always been on the margins. If anything, a serious critique of AI's political economy should be more attentive to those asymmetries, not less.

The fact that I'm writing this in English, carefully, so it won't be misread—that's not incidental to my argument. That is my argument.

5
13
0
Cecelia @helianthropy@tech.lgbt
Public
Shared by phildini

Mendocino County (in California, United States) seems to be working the library over with their exorbitant administrative fees and poor bookkeeping over the last few years.

Mendocino County Library is facing a huge budget shortfall, to the tune of nearly $750,000! County residents, let the County know how much the library means to you and demand change about this billing.

Budget overview here: mendolibrary.org/home/showpubl

0
1
0
미야 @miya827.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy
Public

현실은 집 근처에선 비슷한 지리적 위치에 사는 사람들을 많이 보게되고 그러다보면 소득수준이나 세대같은 측면의 단절이 일어나고 회사/학교에서 만나는 사람도 당연히 비슷한 문제가 있다. 그래서 계급에 기반한 단절이 훨씬 쉽게 일어나는 곳이 인터넷 바깥 세상이라고 생각해요

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Khrys @Khrys@mamot.fr
Public
Shared by Quincy ⁂

L'administration fiscale dit non à Microsoft et choisit Linux !

generation-nt.com/actualites/f

Bientôt il n'y aura plus que l'Éduc Nat à rester chez Microslop.
Avec toutes les données de toustes les élèves (et des parents).

L'administration fiscale dit non à Microsoft et choisit Linux !

GNT est le portail Hi-Tech français consacré aux nouvelles technologies (internet, logiciel, matériel, mobilité, entreprise) et au jeu vidéo PC et consoles.

www.generation-nt.com · Génération NT

0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Nobody @Public15894466@funami.tech
Public

국제앰네스티 한국지부 탈북민 증언 채록집 링크

국제 앰네스티 한국지부의 탈북민 증언 채록집 "60+Voices 북한에서의 일상을 돌아보다"가 국제 사회 감시 속에서 그나마 김정은 하에서 개선된 면도 다루는 등 상대적으로 나은 편이라고 생각하긴 하는데..

amnesty.or.kr/resource/sixty_p

북한인권 증언집: [국문] 60+ Voices - 북한에서의 일상을 돌아보다 - 국제앰네스티 한국지부

『60+ Voices[1] – 북한에서의 일상을 돌아보다』 1. ↑ 한글 표기: 식스티 플러스 보이시스 지금 후원을 통해 세상의 변화에 함께 하세요! 후원하기

amnesty.or.kr · 국제앰네스티 한국지부

0
0
0
0
0
0
Neighbourhoodie Software @neighbourhoodie@toot.berlin
Public
Shared by Jan Lehnardt :couchdb:

Offline with no CRDTs?!

At earlier this month our colleague Alex Feyerke got to introduce Local-First pioneers @couchdbApache CouchDB and @pouchdb in the @localfirstOpen Local First devroom, a space dedicated to all things sync, P2P and conflict resolution.

Check out Alex’ talk: ftp.belnet.be/mirror/FOSDEM/vi

And the great company we were in: openlocalfirst.org/#program

All recordings are now up here: video.fosdem.org/2026/k3201/

Click through to watch — this is the cover slide of Alex Feyerke’s talk at FOSDEM 2026. The full title is: “Get to know local-first pioneers PouchDB & CouchDB — look ma, offline with no CRDTs!”
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary: @hongminhee@hollo.social
Public
Shared by Leigh Garland

I'm writing this in English.

Not because English is my first language—it isn't. I'm writing this in English because if I wrote it in Korean, the people I'm addressing would run it through an outdated translator, misread it, and respond to something I never said. The responsibility for that mistranslation would fall on me. It always does.

This is the thing Eugen Rochko's post misses, despite its good intentions.

@GargronEugen Rochko argues that LLMs are no substitute for human translators, and that people who think otherwise don't actually rely on translation. He's right about some of this. A machine-translated novel is not the same as one rendered by a skilled human translator. But the argument rests on a premise that only makes sense from a certain position: that translation is primarily about quality, about the aesthetic experience of reading literature in another language.

For many of us, translation is first about access.

The professional translation market doesn't scale to cover everything. It never has. What gets translated—and into which languages—follows the logic of cultural hegemony. Works from dominant Western languages flow outward, translated into everything. Works from East Asian languages trickle in, selectively, slowly, on someone else's schedule. The asymmetry isn't incidental; it's structural.

@GargronEugen Rochko notes, fairly, that machine translation existed decades before LLMs. But this is only half the story, and which half matters depends entirely on which languages you're talking about. European language pairs were reasonably serviceable with older tools. Korean–English, Japanese–English, Chinese–English? Genuinely usable translation for these pairs arrived with the LLM era. Treating “machine translation” as a monolithic technology with a uniform history erases the experience of everyone whose language sits far from the Indo-European center.

There's also something uncomfortable in the framing of the button-press thought experiment: “I would erase LLMs even if it took machine translation with it.” For someone whose language has always been peripheral, that button looks very different. It's not an abstract philosophical position; it's a statement about whose access to information is expendable.

I want to be clear: none of this is an argument that LLMs are good, or that the harms @GargronEugen Rochko describes aren't real. They are. But a critique of AI doesn't become more universal by ignoring whose languages have always been on the margins. If anything, a serious critique of AI's political economy should be more attentive to those asymmetries, not less.

The fact that I'm writing this in English, carefully, so it won't be misread—that's not incidental to my argument. That is my argument.

5
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
:blackcat_cry: 느루 :veripawed: @nurrr@trpg-o.xyz
Public

고양이 너무 사악한 존재다;;; 아파트 근처 마당냥이들 아깽이 같은데 갑자기 멀리서 부르면서 점점 다가오더니 현란한 애교를 보여줘서 집에 못갈뻔함;;;;;;한마리 추가로 와서 길바닥에서 살뻔;;;;

0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
한겨레 @hanibsky.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy
Public

미국-이란 전쟁으로 에너지 가격 상승에 대한 부담이 커지는 가운데, 농·축·수산물 물가도 오르면서 소비자 부담을 키우고 있습니다.

유가 부담 커지는데, 농·축·수산물 가격도 최대 13%...

유가 부담 커지는데, 농·축·수산물 가격도 최대 13% 올랐다

미국-이란 전쟁으로 에너지 가격 상승에 대한 부담이 커지는 가운데, 농·축·수산물 물가도 오르면서 소비자 부담을 키우고 있다. 11일 한국농수산식품유통공사 농산물유통정보를 보면, 10일 기준 쌀 20㎏은 6만2889원으로 전년 동기 대비 13.7% 오른 것으로 나타났다

www.hani.co.kr · 한겨레

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
한겨레 @hanibsky.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy
Public
Shared by 잇창명 EatChangmyeong💕🦋

금융감독원이 ‘엔화 반값 환전 오류’가 발생한 토스뱅크에 대한 현장점검에 착수했습니다. 토스뱅크 쪽 손실 규모는 최대 100억원대로 추정됩니다.

금감원, ‘엔화 반값 오류' 토스뱅크 현장점검…100억...

금감원, ‘엔화 반값 오류' 토스뱅크 현장점검…100억원대 손실 추정

금융감독원이 ‘엔화 반값 환전 오류’가 발생한 토스뱅크에 대한 현장점검에 착수했다. 토스뱅크 쪽 손실 규모는 최대 100억원대로 추정된다. 금융당국 등에 따르면 금감원은 11일 토스뱅크 본사에 인력을 투입해 현장점검에 나섰다. 전날 저녁 7시29분부터 약 7분 동안 토

www.hani.co.kr · 한겨레

0
0
0
Tom Schaffer @schaffertom@mastodon.social
Public
Shared by leyrer

Das Zitat ist nicht weniger als ein Rücktrittsgrund. Abgesehen von der Abstrahierung (mehr Risikoexperimente ohne Safeguards, weniger Datenschutz), die Wahnsinn genug ist (vom Staatssekreatär für Digitalisierung!).

Wo bitte kommen wir hin, wenn ein Regierungspolitiker einen Bürger und Bürgerrechtsaktivisten wie Max Schrems persönlich für verzichtbar erklärt?

Q: diepresse.com/20662631?giftcod

Zitat aus DIE PRESSE: "In den letzten Monaten wurde in den Behörden viel mit KI experimentiert. Jetzt gehe es darum, einen sicheren und strukturierten Einsatz von KI in der Verwaltung zu ermöglichen, sagt Pröll. Angesprochen auf die entsprechenden AI Act spart Pröll nicht mit Kritik und bezeichnet die Regularien als Hemmschuh: „Wir brauchen mehr Steinberger und weniger Schrems“ und spielt dabei auf den Entwickler Peter Steinberger, der kürzlich mit seinem AI-Agenten ClawdBot bei OpenAI andockte und dem Datenschutz-Aktivisten und Juristen Max Schrems."
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0