What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0

又又又在泰餐館被認成店員惹、不得不說我和阿羅已是他們team不可或缺的一部分;這家店是有點半自助式的,包括點餐、拿餐具和水都得食客自己來... 前台只有一個半員工,週末根本忙不過來... :blackcat_11117:

大部分食客人都很不錯,知道認錯就乖乖道聲抱歉,我也順手告知他們需要自己動手才有飯吃;但偶爾也會碰見難搞的食客,在我去拿水和餐具的時候非常囂張地打斷我...、問到底什麼時候可以點餐,大概是覺得被我怠慢了?喔,還有第一次光顧,非拉著我推薦菜品的食客... :blob_nodcry:

阿羅呢,就是純氣氛組,經常有食客為了跟他玩,然後把整個過道都堵上了... 有點憋屈怎麼回事,居然享受不到員工價惹... :blackcat_11138:

泰式炒麵,我吃太快,只剩炒麵可以拍
0

LLM coding assistants didn't create a split between craft-lovers and make-it-go developers. They revealed one that was always there.

For craft-lovers, what's being bypassed isn't the output but the act itself. Marx called this separation from the act of production. But the alienation isn't coming from the LLM. It's coming from a market that penalizes whoever produces output more slowly.

Why craft-lovers are losing their craft

LLM 코딩 어시스턴트는 소프트웨어 엔지니어들 사이의 分裂(분열)을 만든 게 아니다. 이미 있던 分裂(분열)을 드러낸 것이다.

匠人(장인) 氣質(기질)의 소프트웨어 엔지니어들이 느끼는 疎外(소외)源泉(원천)은 LLM이 아니다. 그들의 產出物(산출물)을 더 느리게 만드는 쪽에 不利益(불이익)을 주는 市場(시장)이다. Marx의 勞動(노동) 疎外論(소외론)으로 이 問題(문제)를 읽어보는 새 글을 썼다.

왜 코딩을 사랑하는 사람들이 코딩에서 밀려나는가〉 (한글)

5
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0

We are always trying to make @Vivaldi better and our latest release is another example of that. This time our focus was on hiding the UI. Why we do that? Because some of you have been requesting a minimal UI and that is what we have now delivered, but with the UI always close and also fully under your control. Try it out and you will understand! It can be accessed from a button in the status bar or through CTRL F11. Hint : Try associating it with fullscreen (F11), for an even better experience! There is a setting for that, of course.

Another function we added is follow tab. Tie together two tabs side by side. Click a link on the left side and view it on the right side. Great for going through search results without having to go back and forth or viewing images or the like.

Let me know what you think! I hope you like it!

vivaldi.com/blog/vivaldi-on-de

0
12
1
0
0
6
0
0

ソフトウェアにおけるソースコードは絵画における画材やキャンバスのような素材もしくはそれを使って形作られたものに見えてしまいがちなんだけど実際はそれとは大きく違う

0

Do you understand why Trump has lifted the oil sanctions that were punishing Iran, the country he’s bombing, and Russia, the country that’s helping it?

Do you understand why Trump is sending 5,000 Marines to sail through the Strait of Hormuz while complaining that none of our friends and allies will help him reopen it?

Here's the whole explanation.

no01.substack.com/p/march-19-2

0
7
0

I implemented the Nimble type inference algorithm from Henry Baker's old Common Lisp paper in Clojure awhile back for . It's based on lattice/algebraic data flow (Kaplan-Ullman) rather than logical unification (Milner), and works well to calculate type specialization while compiling dynamic languages:

plover.com/misc/hbaker-archive

Yesterday I added a simple C generator to make something like Pre-Scheme <prescheme.org> for

A series of command line invocations showing type inference and compilation to C of a simple factorial program written in Clojure.
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0

Have you ever picked a lock?

edit: a practice lock is any lock that you were picking purely for practice which was not securing anything. a lock in the wild is a lock that was in place to actually secure something (love locks count)

0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0

ソフトウェア批評が成立するとしたら、外形的な現れのなかに一種の内在的論理を持っていると仮定して記述が進められるはずだけど、デザインの方法論そのものが、ソフトウェア構築のロジックと現れ/見た目とかを分離しようとする・分離できるとする記述が多い。

0
1
0

ソフトウェア批評が成立するとしたら、外形的な現れのなかに一種の内在的論理を持っていると仮定して記述が進められるはずだけど、デザインの方法論そのものが、ソフトウェア構築のロジックと現れ/見た目とかを分離しようとする・分離できるとする記述が多い。

0
1
0
0
0

사실 요즘 서울에서 외식값 한끼에 만얼마 내는 것도 흔쾌해서 내는 건 아니다. 그 밑으로는 없거나 먹을 수 없는게 나와서 그렇지. 위에서는 돈잔치 하는데 사람의 삶은 팍팍하다. 사람들이 돈잔치하는 자산시장의 고물이라도 주워먹지 않으면 생존이 되지 않는다는 걸 너무 잘알아서 모두 다 기업의 입장을 자동장착했다. 나는 이게 너무 무섭다.

0
0

ポッドキャストを聞いていたら、ハル・フォスターが、エドワード・サイードに惹かれてコロンビア大学に行ったと話していた。へえー、と。フォスターたちの世代は『スクリーン』誌を熱心に読んでいて、フェミニズム批評が自分たちの世代にとって非常に重要だったという話も印象的。
アーティストが理論に関心がないからといって、作品が理論的ではないというわけではなく、芸術がそれ自体でいかに理論的であるかを示し、理論が芸術に影響を与え、芸術が理論に影響を与え、その緊張関係から新しい思想や実践が生まれる方法を見いだすことに、フォスターは関心があった、とも。フォスター、いいこと言っている。

0
0
1
0
0
0