The issue of SocialHub is an interesting one, because where we are today is an odd situation where you have activitypub developers fragmented across multiple collaborative channels.

  • Some discuss their issues on their respective repositories only
  • Some discuss on SocialHub
  • Some discuss on Matrix channels

However, the bottom line truth is as follows: every ActivityPub developer is on the fediverse, ergo why shouldn't ActivityPub-focused discussions take place on the fediverse as well?

Up until this year, SocialHub has been an island separate from the fediverse. I used this analogy in my talk at fedicon to describe how lonely starting a community can be.

To SocialHub's credit, they have created a community of ActivityPub developers that exists to this day, kudos to them! The question remains now whether SocialHub performing their function adequately — to bring together ActivityPub developers of all stripes.

That's a question worth exploring in and of itself.

cc @fediversereport@mastodon.social @julian@activitypub.space

0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://community.nodebb.org/post/105653 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)