Paolo Melchiorre @paulox@fosstodon.org
Public

Today on my walk, I was listening to the DjangoChat episode on Django 6.0 with Natalia Bidart, hosted by Carlton Gibson and Will Vincent, and in just the first 15 minutes I got so many cool ideas to share!

For example, how we might help the community test new Django versions more easily or align releases more smoothly.

Just a little daily inspiration from a nice stroll! 🌿

Give it a listen and get inspired! 🎧
djangochat.com/episodes/django

CC @djangochatDjango Chat Podcast @wsvincentWill Vincent @carltonCarlton Gibson

A winter beach scene from the shoreline: an empty stretch of sand with no umbrellas, a coastal pine grove in the background, and a clear sky above. The winter sun is low on the horizon, casting bright, crisp colors over the scene.
Paolo Melchiorre @paulox@fosstodon.org
Public

Continuing to listen to @djangochatDjango Chat Podcast , the topic of AI-generated contributions came up. 🎧

Shortly after, I read a post from the GNOME Extensions team explaining why they had to add a new review rule. They are seeing more and more patches generated with AI, full of unnecessary code, bad patterns, and little real understanding behind them. 🤖

blogs.gnome.org/jrahmatzadeh/2

It feels like a shared Open Source problem. Have you seen similar issues elsewhere? 🐛

EGO Review Guidelines For AI

AI and GNOME Shell Extensions

Why we have added a new rule to the EGO review guidelines. So the packages with unnecessary code that indicate they are AI-generated will be rejected.

blogs.gnome.org · GNOME Shell Extensions

0
0
0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://fosstodon.org/users/paulox/statuses/115733957088128315 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)