@nathan @davidrevoy @dansup @indexBuilding ActivityPub @AffektJake

There's mention of 'respect for the protocol', but given the inherent flexibility of we can say that the protocol is respectful of many interpretations. The respect @ploum asks for, boils down to current informal consensus for interoperability, which in turn is to large extent Mastodon's interpretation.

It is a pity that fedi is so app-centric, but each apps choices are valid. The protocol needs better grassroots standardization process.

@nathan @davidrevoy @dansup @indexBuilding ActivityPub @AffektJake @ploum

My opinion re: compliance is that any project is free to implement AS/AP in any way they want, with any level of .

is absolute best-practice, but a project has full choice here. It's all FOSS freedom. No blame should be put towards these projects where they follow their own path.

Highly encouraging compliance is among the duties of the Grassroots standardization process that exists in the ecosystem.

0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://social.coop/users/smallcircles/statuses/115661623875492034 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)