I mean, if you really want end to end encryption then just put a contact for that into your profile and then if someone wants to securely DM you they can, and they have the properly implemented and battle tested double ratchet and all that. But no, apparently that's not good enough and it has to be a one stop shop and every fediverse implementation will have to roll its own end-to-end crypto, probably with years of interop bugs and leaks ahead.

@bobBob Mottram โœ…

I'm happy with this development.

Just not with the way in which the now evolves, i.e. on the basis of protocol decay, tech debt, and whack-a-mole development. Which have been my and frustration in the past years of facilitation and advocacy.

Where I have use cases is in Personal , to enable participation, and subsequently work collectively on

coding.social/introduction/#pe

0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://social.coop/users/smallcircles/statuses/115751544462698446 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)