@smallcircles🫧 socialcoding.. @jerger @mariusormarius I meant "generic" primarily to mean it's not a client for a specific server implementation. In this case, it is a C2S testing client so it is not specific to a particular user domain either. In the first sense of "generic", I could imagine a media publishing app (images, videos) that's not tied specifical to PixelFed or PeerTube (as examples). Or a "generic" microblogging app. The latter is where the Note to Article conversion would probably be an issue.

@steveSteve Bate @jerger @mariusormarius

Guess this is a general area where due to the lack of clear protocol layering there's much confusion in overall terminology usage.

The whole idea of an "app" is not part of itself. It is a leaked abstraction on what devs think they offer ("I build an app for my users").

There is no "generic" microblogging app, unless there exists an agreement for the specification of said app. PixelFed is a spec, PeerTube is another spec in different domain. A generic microblogging app would live where? As FEP? Collection of FEP's? W3C Note giving a 'specification profile'?

0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://social.coop/users/smallcircles/statuses/116051631269154640 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)