A developer ecosystem that has only cheerleaders is doomed.
If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://social.coop/users/smallcircles/statuses/116119514853649098 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)
https://social.coop/@smallcircles/116119514853649098
To get back to 'shared ownership' and
@benBen Werdmuller article that triggered my blog post.
The #fediverse is certainly not all cheerleaders, but the question is whether critical notes can be properly heard and addressed in any meaningful way. After all who are the ones who should hear them and act on them? It is "the herd", the crowd, the commons that happens to receive toots via their social graph, and to the extent these manage to penetrate bubbles and echo chambers. To make a strong argument, to reach people, the only strategy is social media influence marketing of sorts. You have to dare to rock the boat enough to be heard. And that's a very bad way to grow a healthy ecosystem I think.
It relates to the oft-heared criticism that on the app-centric #ActivityPub fediverse, it is the app devs who are de-facto in charge and decide what goes and what goes not.
The social dynamics are tricky but fascinating. I hope to be able to spend more time at https://coding.social