@hongminhee洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary: > Slapping an facade onto an existing Mastodon-like server and calling it C2S doesn't buy you much ...

The benefit of having a C2S adapter for Mastodon is that it provides a large user pool that could motivate developers to create C2S UIs rather than only supporting the Mastodon API. Having more server-independent client implementations may motivate devs to build general C2S servers with advanced features and eventually disrupt the Mastodon dominance in the Fedi.

@hongminhee洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary: A general-purpose C2S API doesn't mean the user interfaces themselves are general-purpose. One could still build a microblogging UI, a geosocial app, a image sharing app, a chess game app, or whatever, but these would be able to interact with the same AP C2S server for account management, data storage and federation. And they could all use the same account rather than the account-per-service/app model we have now.

0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://social.technoetic.com/users/steve/statuses/116243008538070215 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)