What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

다른 연합우주 서버로부터 앙케트 조사를 담은 Create(Question) 액티비티가 자주 들어오고 있는데, Hackers' Pub에서도 적어도 앙케트 조사를 열 수는 없어도 참여할 수는 있게 해야 하나 고민하고 있다. 그런데 이것도 결국 UI가 귀찮은 문제인데…

3
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0

서비스 종료 공지
靑白은 약 3개월 후인
2025년 7월 25일까지 운영 후 서비스가 종료될 예정이에요.
서비스가 종료된 이후에는 靑白에 접속하실 수 없고, 서버에 저장되어 있던 유저 정보는 모두 삭제 및 파기돼요.
본 공지가 게시된 이후에도 커스텀 이모지 추가 등의 기본적인 운영 활동은 서비스 종료 일자까지 계속되며, 원활한 계정 이동을 위해 장기 미접속 계정 삭제는 중지할 예정이에요.
지금까지 靑白을 이용해 주셔서 정말 감사합니다!

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1

https://t.me/HackerNews100zhTW/5775
巴黎在過去 20 年間進行了一場城市大改造,逐步減少汽車的影響力,將原本的車道轉變為自行車道,並新增綠地空間,同時取消了約 5 萬個停車位。這項轉型帶來了顯著的環境效益,尤其是在空氣品質方面的改善。根據法國首都地區獨立空氣品質監測組織 Airparif 的報告,自 2005 年以來,巴黎的細懸浮微粒 (PM 2.5,Fine Particulate Matter) 濃度下降了 55%,二氧化氮濃度也減少了 50%。報告指出,這些進步主要歸功於限制交通流量以及禁止高污染車輛的政策。

💯 Hacker News 100 繁體中文

巴黎向汽車說再見,空氣污染地圖揭示驚人變化 (★ 107 分) 巴黎在過去 20 年間進行了一場城市大改造,逐步減少汽車的影響力,將原本的車道轉變為自行車道,並新增綠地空間,同時取消了約 5 萬個停車位。這項轉型帶來了顯著的環境效益,尤其是在空氣品質方面的改善。根據法國首都地區獨立空氣品質監測組織 Airparif 的報告,自 2005 年以來,巴黎的細懸浮微粒 (PM 2.5,Fine Particulate Matter) 濃度下降了 55%,二氧化氮濃度也減少了 50%。報告指出,這些進步主要歸功於限制交通流量以及禁止高污染車輛的政策。 這樣的轉變不僅影響了空氣品質,也改變了巴黎的城市氛圍。透過減少車輛數量,城市騰出了更多空間給行人和自行車騎士,讓居民能享受更健康、更宜居的環境。Airparif 的數據顯示,這些政策確實有效降低了污染水平,尤其是在市中心區域,污染濃度的下降趨勢非常明顯。這也為其他城市提供了參考範例,證明透過公共政策和都市規劃,可以有效改善居民的生活品質。 轉向 Hacker News 上的討論,許多網友對巴黎的轉型表示讚賞,認為減少汽車使用不僅改善了空氣品質,也降低了城市噪音污染。一位用戶提到,汽車是城市噪音的主要來源,巴黎從 1995 年到 2025 年的聲音環境有了巨大變化。此外,有網友指出類似的空氣品質改善在新冠疫情期間的封鎖中也曾出現,當時車流量大幅減少,空氣變得格外清新,進一步印證了減少車輛對環境的正面影響。 然而,討論中也出現了一些質疑的聲音。部分網友認為,空氣品質的改善不完全來自減少停車位或新增自行車道等政策,也可能是因為汽車排放技術的進步或高污染柴油車的逐步淘汰。還有用戶提到,即使是電動車 (EV, Electric Vehicle) 也會因輪胎和煞車磨損產生微粒污染,指出完全消除私人車輛對健康的影響可能才是城市的最佳解方。這些觀點顯示,雖然巴黎的措施成效顯著,但要達成更全面的環境目標,仍需更廣泛的解決方案。 👥 28 則討論、評論 💬 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43665793

t.me · Telegram

0
1
0

If we in the manage to get our country back from the current , and we still think government is a good idea (I'm not trying to resolve the question of right now), we need to recognize first of all that we can't go back to the prior status quo. Certain core aspects of that system got us into this mess, and will require fundamental change.

(1) Our system needs overhaul. The right to vote needs to be recognized explicitly as a RIGHT, not a privilege for each state to regulate largely as it pleases. In particular, no criminal conviction should ever be able to impair the right to vote; racist abuse of the criminal law has been used to accomplish widespread disenfranchisement of minorities. Also, we need to recognize that winner-take-all voting systems are utterly incompatible with genuine democracy. If you ever have to ask whether you can afford to vote for who you really want, as opposed to voting for the lesser evil, you do not live in a democracy. Something like proportional representation, ranked-choice voting, or instant-runoff voting is not a luxury; some such system is a minimum requirement for authentic democracy.

(2) To hell with "". Any protection it supposedly offered us has been purely illusory. Indeed, it was never intended to safeguard the people. It was designed by an elite who deeply distrusted the people, in order to safeguard their wealth and power FROM the people. A legislature answerable to the people is the best safeguard for their rights that any government can hope to offer. Autonomy for the judicial and executive functions of government, as separate "branches" outside the control of the legislature, has brought nothing good. Throughout most of its history, an autonomous Supreme Court has consistently defended the most depraved policies of private power against legislative efforts to control them; and now it has aided and abetted the autonomous Presidency in fulfilling its inherent tendency to degenerate into a . Put the courts and all executive functions under full legislative control, to be granted only such limited and conditional autonomy as the legislature sees fit to offer them.

(3) We will need to overhaul our understanding of what the right of consists in. I do not like the unclear slogan "money is not speech"; but the right of INDIVIDUALS to speak freely is what must be safeguarded, and if that is to be accomplished, we cannot allow private capital to monopolize control over the media of communication, much less recognize an inviolable right for private capital to buy such control. Also, we may need to place severe restrictions — as has done — on organized promotion of certain ideas that involve a systematic attempt to suppress the very existence, let alone the free expression, of others. A march has more in common with a brandished weapon than with a discussion of fascist ideas in, say, a university classroom or a private home.

These changes (1)–(3) will not, of course, be sufficient by themselves. I have not addressed issues as fundamental as who will own the means of , whether people should be guaranteed an unconditional (), or how (and whether) should be done. But (1)–(3) will still be needed, no matter how a host of other basic questions are to be resolved.

0
0
0
1
1

https://t.me/HackerNews100zhTW/5775
巴黎在過去 20 年間進行了一場城市大改造,逐步減少汽車的影響力,將原本的車道轉變為自行車道,並新增綠地空間,同時取消了約 5 萬個停車位。這項轉型帶來了顯著的環境效益,尤其是在空氣品質方面的改善。根據法國首都地區獨立空氣品質監測組織 Airparif 的報告,自 2005 年以來,巴黎的細懸浮微粒 (PM 2.5,Fine Particulate Matter) 濃度下降了 55%,二氧化氮濃度也減少了 50%。報告指出,這些進步主要歸功於限制交通流量以及禁止高污染車輛的政策。

💯 Hacker News 100 繁體中文

巴黎向汽車說再見,空氣污染地圖揭示驚人變化 (★ 107 分) 巴黎在過去 20 年間進行了一場城市大改造,逐步減少汽車的影響力,將原本的車道轉變為自行車道,並新增綠地空間,同時取消了約 5 萬個停車位。這項轉型帶來了顯著的環境效益,尤其是在空氣品質方面的改善。根據法國首都地區獨立空氣品質監測組織 Airparif 的報告,自 2005 年以來,巴黎的細懸浮微粒 (PM 2.5,Fine Particulate Matter) 濃度下降了 55%,二氧化氮濃度也減少了 50%。報告指出,這些進步主要歸功於限制交通流量以及禁止高污染車輛的政策。 這樣的轉變不僅影響了空氣品質,也改變了巴黎的城市氛圍。透過減少車輛數量,城市騰出了更多空間給行人和自行車騎士,讓居民能享受更健康、更宜居的環境。Airparif 的數據顯示,這些政策確實有效降低了污染水平,尤其是在市中心區域,污染濃度的下降趨勢非常明顯。這也為其他城市提供了參考範例,證明透過公共政策和都市規劃,可以有效改善居民的生活品質。 轉向 Hacker News 上的討論,許多網友對巴黎的轉型表示讚賞,認為減少汽車使用不僅改善了空氣品質,也降低了城市噪音污染。一位用戶提到,汽車是城市噪音的主要來源,巴黎從 1995 年到 2025 年的聲音環境有了巨大變化。此外,有網友指出類似的空氣品質改善在新冠疫情期間的封鎖中也曾出現,當時車流量大幅減少,空氣變得格外清新,進一步印證了減少車輛對環境的正面影響。 然而,討論中也出現了一些質疑的聲音。部分網友認為,空氣品質的改善不完全來自減少停車位或新增自行車道等政策,也可能是因為汽車排放技術的進步或高污染柴油車的逐步淘汰。還有用戶提到,即使是電動車 (EV, Electric Vehicle) 也會因輪胎和煞車磨損產生微粒污染,指出完全消除私人車輛對健康的影響可能才是城市的最佳解方。這些觀點顯示,雖然巴黎的措施成效顯著,但要達成更全面的環境目標,仍需更廣泛的解決方案。 👥 28 則討論、評論 💬 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43665793

t.me · Telegram

0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
4
0
1
1
0
0
0
0