What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
1
0
0

AI為達成目的學會扯謊甚至威脅創作者 專家示警
2025/6/29
cna.com.tw/news/ait/2025062900

> 法新社報導,其中一個最令人瞠目結舌的案例中,AI業者Anthropic最新發布的Claude 4在遭面臨拔插頭的斷電威脅時會出手反擊,勒索1名工程師揚言將揭穿一起婚外情。

> 另外,熱門聊天機器人ChatGPT美國開發商OpenAI的o1試圖把自己下載至外部伺服器,被抓包時竟會矢口否認。

> 這幾個例子說明了一個需嚴肅看待的現實:ChatGPT推出引發風潮至今2年多,AI研究人員仍未充分了解自己究竟創造了什麼。

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0

A sister of mine died after basically starving for two years because doctors could not figure out what was wrong.

These ticks are everywhere in the South already. But in the hospital she died in (in the south), no one had any real idea how to treat it.

This disease is super weird:
- it’s a tick-borne allergy
- it’s the only known allergy to a carbohydrate, *not* a protein (so hydrolyzation, which is a standard allergy treatment, does not help)
- the carbohydrate (usually called alpha gal) is in all non-primate mammal products, including milk

It’s obviously bad for multiple reasons. But it’s also going to be very hard to diagnose for a lot of people.
mastodon.social/@koen_hufkens/

0
0
1

A sister of mine died after basically starving for two years because doctors could not figure out what was wrong.

These ticks are everywhere in the South already. But in the hospital she died in (in the south), no one had any real idea how to treat it.

This disease is super weird:
- it’s a tick-borne allergy
- it’s the only known allergy to a carbohydrate, *not* a protein (so hydrolyzation, which is a standard allergy treatment, does not help)
- the carbohydrate (usually called alpha gal) is in all non-primate mammal products, including milk

It’s obviously bad for multiple reasons. But it’s also going to be very hard to diagnose for a lot of people.
mastodon.social/@koen_hufkens/

0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0

As an excercice on I am trying to write a basic text editor in C. Sofar I can open a file and read it into a biobuffer, then print it to the console by writing to /dev/cons file. That works fine. Now I am struggling to clear the console before writing, so that I have only the intended text, which I can edit and then save by reading /dev/cons and saving it to the original text file. Not sure if this makes send nor if this is the way of coding. Any suggestions?

0

Linux Gaming news:

* Fedora is killing gaming!!

Week later:

* We generated enough angry comments, Fedora is not killing gaming this time, our job is done!!!

---

Folks, no, was not trying to kill Linux gaming. And also no, nothing is done here. Angry comments is still not how things are being done in our line of work.

But it might be a good time to focus some attention and write some meaningful investigative news on WoW64 in wine, containerization for games, Steam for x64 and so on

0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0

Satisfying my unscientific curiosity here. Please boost for visibility.

How old are you?

0
0
0

用手機註冊來到這裡,第9天才打開網頁版的我,終於解鎖了整個世界,原來這裡的個人化功能這麼多,整體介面也很不錯,我喜歡!

希望能有更多人來這裡玩! :ablobattention:

0
0
0
1

I wish we had spaces to collaborate on technical work where being a jerk was just not allowed. Like, actual proper fearless moderation.

Your reply starts with "No." on its own line? Two weeks ban. Learn to behave.

You go on a tear about another participant? One year ban. No warning.

I'm a privileged white dude with 20k followers and even I hesitate to contribute to some spaces because of the mailing list hand-to-hand combat.

Imagine how many contributions by talented folks we are wasting!

0
0
0

"강자는 혐오할 수 없다"는 환상

“강자는 혐오할 수 없다”는 말은 환상이다.
그 말은 마치 누군가를 혐오해도 된다는 면허처럼 쓰인다.
강자는 이미 충분히 말했고, 충분히 들어왔고,
우리는 이제 말할 차례라는 식으로.

하지만 그런 말은 언제나 누군가의 고통을 지운다.
혐오는 방향이 아니라 행위다.
그게 누구를 향하든, 혐오는 누군가를 인간 이하로 취급하는 행위다.
강자라서 괜찮은 혐오는 없다.

사람은 언제나 단일한 정체성으로 살아가지 않는다.
여성도, 남성도, 약자도, 때로는 서로에게 상처를 줄 수 있다.
우리는 가끔 피해자였고, 또 가끔은 누군가에겐 강자였다.
이걸 인정하지 않으면, 결국 또 다른 차별을 반복할 뿐이다.

문제는 서로를 들으려 하지 않는 데 있다.
우리는 듣는 걸 멈췄고, 말하는 데만 익숙해졌다.
공감은 요구하지만 제공하지 않고,
이해받고 싶어 하지만 이해하려 들지 않는다.

혐오로 정의를 세울 수는 없다.
혐오로는 복수는 가능해도 회복은 불가능하다.
지금 우리에게 필요한 건 “우리가 옳다”는 선언이 아니라,
“다시 듣겠다”는 결심이다.

1

"강자는 혐오할 수 없다"는 환상

“강자는 혐오할 수 없다”는 말은 환상이다.
그 말은 마치 누군가를 혐오해도 된다는 면허처럼 쓰인다.
강자는 이미 충분히 말했고, 충분히 들어왔고,
우리는 이제 말할 차례라는 식으로.

하지만 그런 말은 언제나 누군가의 고통을 지운다.
혐오는 방향이 아니라 행위다.
그게 누구를 향하든, 혐오는 누군가를 인간 이하로 취급하는 행위다.
강자라서 괜찮은 혐오는 없다.

사람은 언제나 단일한 정체성으로 살아가지 않는다.
여성도, 남성도, 약자도, 때로는 서로에게 상처를 줄 수 있다.
우리는 가끔 피해자였고, 또 가끔은 누군가에겐 강자였다.
이걸 인정하지 않으면, 결국 또 다른 차별을 반복할 뿐이다.

문제는 서로를 들으려 하지 않는 데 있다.
우리는 듣는 걸 멈췄고, 말하는 데만 익숙해졌다.
공감은 요구하지만 제공하지 않고,
이해받고 싶어 하지만 이해하려 들지 않는다.

혐오로 정의를 세울 수는 없다.
혐오로는 복수는 가능해도 회복은 불가능하다.
지금 우리에게 필요한 건 “우리가 옳다”는 선언이 아니라,
“다시 듣겠다”는 결심이다.

1
0
0
0
0
0

The Project Hail Mary trailer is OUT NOW and I’m so dang excited. Be sure to read the book first if you haven’t.

I usually don’t care about spoilers, but the trailer includes one that’s egregious. You have been warned: youtube.com/watch?v=m08TxIsFTR

0
0
0
0
0
0
1

You can formulate the reflection rule in HoTT, postulating that every equality is in fact judgmental, But this implies that all the higher groupoid structure collapses, and hence is inconsistent with the univalence axiom.

In other words, if you want univalence-- if you want to treat isomorphisms on equal footing with equalities-- you _have to_ expand the definition of equality. You can think of univalence as saying that all equalities are "secretly" isomorphisms (strictly speaking, equivalences).

0

I wish we had spaces to collaborate on technical work where being a jerk was just not allowed. Like, actual proper fearless moderation.

Your reply starts with "No." on its own line? Two weeks ban. Learn to behave.

You go on a tear about another participant? One year ban. No warning.

I'm a privileged white dude with 20k followers and even I hesitate to contribute to some spaces because of the mailing list hand-to-hand combat.

Imagine how many contributions by talented folks we are wasting!

0
0
0