What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

1
0
2
0
0
1

RE: mastodon.neat.computer/@privac

Excellent video that people starting to learn about privacy would benefit a lot from watching!
From an emotional point of view, it is crucial to start by defining your threat model and build your digital life from there. It's so easy to enter in panic mode, because you can always go more private, more anonymous. But is it actually serving you?

0
0
1
1
0
0

I hate that there's basically no way of knowing whether this means "this app is $3, but you can't know the price without downloading it" or if it means "this app will act like a Windows Vista machine with a virus even after you pay for it, and there is nothing you can do about it except uninstall"

"Check Calendar - Habit Tracker" app listing
"Contains ads - In app purchases"
0
0
0
1
1
0

It looks like federation is working! I'll keep the horizontal format videos on , and vertical, short-format videos here: @Moxxi@loops.video
The videos load perfectly on the Android Mastodon app, yay! It'll be more convenient than having to exit your phone app to end up on a website designed for desktop to watch a 10-second video designed for your phone! You don't even need the Loops app! The hashtags work but maybe I should use something else than for the videos?

0

Just when you thought @techconnectify.bsky.social couldn’t take the dishwasher discourse up another level, Alec does it again.

(If you’ve not seen the other videos in the series, they’re brilliant)

youtu.be/DAX2_mPr9W8

0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0

Does anyone have a reference for combining unification-based type inference with bidirectional type-checking?

ie you should be able to take a bidirectional type system and formulate a constraint-based version it, and I've done that a few times in an ad-hoc way, but I'd like to see if there's a proper principled approach to it

0
0
0

🎤 Call for Participation (CfP) – Gestalte das Programm der !
Du hast ein spannendes Open-Source-Projekt, technisches Know-how oder gesellschaftliche Insights rund um Freie Software? Dann reiche jetzt deinen Beitrag ein!

🗓️ Deadline: 31. Januar 2026
💬 Formate: Vorträge (20/40 Min), Workshops, Lightning Talks
📩 Einreichung über Pretalx: pretalx.linuxtage.at/glt26/cfp

Wir freuen uns auf eure Ideen! 🙌

Grafik zeigt den Text des Posts
0

Does anyone have a reference for combining unification-based type inference with bidirectional type-checking?

ie you should be able to take a bidirectional type system and formulate a constraint-based version it, and I've done that a few times in an ad-hoc way, but I'd like to see if there's a proper principled approach to it

0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0

Blogged: Easier reflection with [UnsafeAccessorType] in .NET 10 - exploring the .NET 10 preview, part 9

andrewlock.net/exploring-dotne

In this post I show how to work with [UnsafeAccessor] to do 'easier' reflection and how to use .NET 10's [UnsafeAccessorType] with types you can't reference at compile time

0
0