What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
0

Asked the shoggoth robot a research question, and got back: “This suggests the design space you're interested in is still relatively unexplored in open source. You might be building something novel.”

Good, good, that means my chances of getting to do it for work are essentially nil. It seemed like an obvious idea to me, though, so... really?

0

맥코는 외계 존재 자체를 단정하기보다는 만약 누구도 부정할 수 없는 공식 발표가 나올 경우 인간의 신뢰 체계와 정부 통화 금융 시스템에 대한 믿음이 급속히 붕괴될 수 있다는 점을 강조한것 같다 라고 ChatGPT는 이야기 함 하지만 내가 볼땐 이분은 뭔가 결정적인 증거자료를 본것 같긴함. 그러지 않고서야 이런 이야기를 할 필요는 없으므로... 관련기사: www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home...

0

사회적 혼란과 폭동까지 이어질 수 있다고 판단하며 영국 중앙은행 총재에게 이런 저확률 초대형 리스크 시나리오에 대한 대비 계획을 미리 수립해야 한다는 취지의 서한을 보냈다는것인데 왜 지금 이런 이야기를 했을까 궁금하긴함 겉으로는 이분의 문제의식은 최근 미국에서 UAP (과거 UFO)에 대해 고위 관료들이 “정체를 모른다”, “우리 기술은 아니다”라고 언급하고 일부 자료가 기밀 해제되면서 외계 지적 생명체 가능성이 과거 음모론 수준을 넘어 공적 담론으로 이동하고 있다는 인식에서 출발했다고 하던데

0

헬렌 맥코라는 인물이 있음; 이분은 과거 영국 중앙은행에서 약 10년간 금융안보 분야 수석 분석가로 근무했고 케임브리지대 출신이며 이후 자산관리와 핀테크 업계에서 일해온 실존 인물인데 이분이 뜬금없는 주장을 함; 외계 생명체의 존재가 미국 정부나 백악관 등을 통해 공식적으로 확인 발표될 경우 인류의 세계관이 근본적으로 흔들리는 ‘존재론적 충격’이 발생하고 이로 인해 금융시장에서 극단적 패닉과 자산 가격 급변, 은행 대량 인출 사태, 결제 시스템 마비

0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1

BREAKING: A new video out of Minneapolis shows the truth doesn’t want you to see… compliance does not protect you.

In this video, ICE agents pull up to a vehicle and immediately demand the driver’s ID.
The man calmly asks the most basic, question: “Why am I being pulled over?”

They never answer… because they don’t have a legal reason to stop him.

Even so, the man begins to retrieve his ID anyway.

An then orders him to turn off the vehicle. The driver says, “No problem, sir, I’ll get out.”

The agent refuses, then immediately changes commands again: “I need to see your ID.”

Suddenly, an agent on the passenger side pounds on the window. Then he strikes it with a hard object, clearly threatening to break it.

At the same time, the driver-side agent again demands the ID.

This is not confusion. This is intentional command overload… a tactic used to manufacture “noncompliance” so force can be justified.

ICE’s own training materials explicitly state:

“Noncompliance or refusal to cooperate with officer commands, without fighting back, does NOT violate 18 U.S.C. § 111.”

In plain English: not immediately obeying commands is NOT a crime.

And here’s the key legal issue:

Unless agents have:
• a valid arrest warrant, or
• probable cause that a specific crime has been committed

they cannot:
• use force
• break windows
• issue violent threats
• detain or arrest someone


means specific, articulable facts that would make a reasonable officer believe a crime occurred… not vibes, not attitude, not silence, not filming, not asking questions.

Back in the video, the passenger-side agent escalates further, shouting:
“First time I ask you to roll your window down, you do it.”

The driver responds:
“Are you in danger, sir? Are you escalating this?”

The agent replies:
“I don’t know. Hands up.”

Despite the driver repeatedly attempting to comply and hand over ID, agents continue shouting conflicting commands.

At one point, the agent orders the driver to “talk to the original agent”… which is exactly what the driver was doing before the window-smashing threat.

Then the man asks, “Are you feeling unsafe or uneasy?”

The agent responds, “I don’t know, man.” while standing on the passenger side of the car, smirking.

The driver finally says what anyone would say surrounded by armed men:
“How many guns do I have around me? I need you to calm down. I’m asking him to stop banging on my car. Is that too much?”

He even offers… again… to step out of the vehicle.

This is not law enforcement. This is intimidation fishing for an excuse.

No probable cause.
No warrant.
No lawful basis for force.

And yet, the escalation came entirely from the agents.

This video proves something chilling: you can comply, stay calm, ask lawful questions… and still be threatened with violence.

So, the question isn’t “Why didn’t he just comply?”

The question is how many people have already been assaulted under this exact playbook… and how many more will be, before this stops?

0
0
0
0

To be clear, I don't trust Fedi to handle this information with care, either. Difference being that on Fedi, your mods aren't some VC/blockchain-funded corporate entity. They're often enough your friends, your neighbors, or yourself.

While there are certain database-related exploits which can be used to pull a blocklist, often enough that's a challenge for a typical layperson with an axe to grind. And it's an incomplete picture thanks to the quirks of federation. Not so on Bluesky.

I'm not going to talk about Bluesky anymore for a bit, but I know folks are coming back here after hanging out there for a while, and I want to encourage Fedi users not to gloat, not to be jerks about it.

And if you're just (re)joining us on Fedi, like all affinity groups, you're going to run into enthusiasts who are gloating, but I promise most of us are just happy you're here and want to help make this place awesome for you. <3

0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1

TL;DR Most EV batteries will last longer than the cars they’re in. Battery degradation is at better (meaning: lower) rates than expected. Slow charging is better. Drive EV and don’t worry about your battery.

„Our 2025 analysis of over 22,700 electric vehicles, covering 21 different vehicle models, confirms that overall, modern EV batteries are robust and built to last beyond a typical vehicle’s service life.“

geotab.com/blog/ev-battery-hea

Key Insights

Average degradation rate: The average annual electric vehicle degradation rate is 2.3%. 

Power: High-power DC fast charging (>100kW) is the single largest stressor, leading to degradation rates up to twice that of the low power charging group (3.0% vs 1.5% per year). 

Climate: Hot climates impose a penalty on battery life, with vehicles operating in hot conditions degrading 0.4% faster per year than those in mild climates. 

Utilization: The increase in degradation from high daily use is a measurable but worthwhile trade-off for the gains in fleet productivity and ROI.

State of charge (SOC): For most EV use, there's no need to worry about avoiding fully charging or emptying the battery. Degradation only speeds up when vehicles spend over 80% of their total time at or near-full or nearly empty charge levels.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0

I'll be at this week, talking about some of my experiences as a freelance open-source programmer and the hidden costs to me and my family that we don't talk about much when we discuss funding for open source.

I'm still putting the talk together, and I'm not quite sure yet what it will be. I know what point I want to make, I think, but it's all quite personal and messy (ie human) and turning that into a single cohesive story is tricky!

Anyway, come along if you're able, I'd like to see some friendly faces ☺️

2026.everythingopen.au/schedul

0
0
0
0

I'll be at this week, talking about some of my experiences as a freelance open-source programmer and the hidden costs to me and my family that we don't talk about much when we discuss funding for open source.

I'm still putting the talk together, and I'm not quite sure yet what it will be. I know what point I want to make, I think, but it's all quite personal and messy (ie human) and turning that into a single cohesive story is tricky!

Anyway, come along if you're able, I'd like to see some friendly faces ☺️

2026.everythingopen.au/schedul

0
0
0

想來還是那句老話。愈富有的人,無論是金錢、時間、精力、還是心情,總是愈有餘裕顯得大方跟做好事。反過來說,沒辦法的人多半就是在某些地方相對匱乏。這不是在批評,正好相反,我覺得其實絕大多數的行為,都是受到這些影響,而非那個人的本質。但這也不是說這是能輕易改變的,甚至根本無法改變。環境跟內心的狀態能那麼好改變的話,人人都能改過向善了。我只是愈來愈覺得,其實人沒什麼本質可言,或是得把後天的環境影響全部歸到本質。

攻殼機動隊說軀體跟靈魂是互相影響的,兩者加起來才是本質。我想,恐怕還得把環境經驗也加上去才行。不知道該說人是個很會適應的生物,還是無法適應的生物。至少那不是自由意志可以控制的,我想。

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0