What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

pkg update @pkgupdt@hl.pkgu.net
Public

jtbc 올림픽/월드컵 중계권 단독 계약은 결국 네이버만 이득 보고 끝나는 건가. 😅 개인적으로는 올림픽을 조용하게 넘기고 있어서 좋고, 월드컵도 네이버로 보면 그만이라 쭉 단독중계 해줬으면 한다.

자유 시장 경쟁을 외치는 놈들이 독점 판매자 지위에서 구매자의 컨소시움이나 정보 교환 인정 못한다고 바락바락 우기는 꼴을 보는게 고역이긴 하다만... 하긴 이게 한국식 시장주의인가. 😇

0
0
0
Silverkey | 은열쇠 @silverkey.social@bsky.brid.gy
Public

일론 머스크는 화려한 이력서보다 직접적인 대화를 통한 ‘직관’과 ‘인성’을 채용의 핵심으로 꼽았다. 그는 “선한 마음씨(Goodness of Heart)가 중요하다고 생각한다”며 “한때 이 부분을 과소평가한 적이 있었는데, 결국 그가 좋은 사람인지, 믿을 만한지, 똑똑하고 재능 있으며 열심히 일하는지가 핵심”이라고 말했다

“이력서 믿지 마라” 머스크도 속았던 ‘간판’의 함정

“이력서 믿지 마라” 머스크도 속았던 ‘간판’의 함정

Jacqueline Munis & 김다린 기자 · 일론 머스크 테슬라 CEO는 기술 패권 경쟁에서 승리하기 위해 적합한 인재를 찾는 일은 생각보다 간단치 않다고 말한다.머스크는 마이크로매니징(그는 이를 농담조로 ‘나노매니징’이라 부른다) 스타일로 유명하며, 채용에서도 예외는 아니다. 그는 스페이스X 설립 초기, 더 이상 시간이 허락하지 않을 때까지 첫 수천 명의 직원을 직접 인터뷰했다고 밝혔다.스트라이프 공동 창업자 존 콜리슨과 테크 팟캐스터 드와케시 파텔이 진행하는 프로그램에 출연한 머스크는, 이제 직원들에게 ‘와우(Wow)’ 포인트를 찾도록 시키며 후보자의 ‘특출난 능력에 대한

www.fortunekorea.co.kr · 포춘코리아 디지털 뉴스

0
0
1
은열쇠🥨 :ivory_boost: @Silverkey027@mastodon.social
Public

일론 머스크는 화려한 이력서보다 직접적인 대화를 통한 ‘직관’과 ‘인성’을 채용의 핵심으로 꼽았다.

그는 “선한 마음씨(Goodness of Heart)가 중요하다고 생각한다”며 “한때 이 부분을 과소평가한 적이 있었는데, 결국 그가 좋은 사람인지, 믿을 만한지, 똑똑하고 재능 있으며 열심히 일하는지가 핵심”이라고 말했다 fortunekorea.co.kr/news/articl

“이력서 믿지 마라” 머스크도 속았던 ‘간판’의 함정

Jacqueline Munis & 김다린 기자 · 일론 머스크 테슬라 CEO는 기술 패권 경쟁에서 승리하기 위해 적합한 인재를 찾는 일은 생각보다 간단치 않다고 말한다.머스크는 마이크로매니징(그는 이를 농담조로 ‘나노매니징’이라 부른다) 스타일로 유명하며, 채용에서도 예외는 아니다. 그는 스페이스X 설립 초기, 더 이상 시간이 허락하지 않을 때까지 첫 수천 명의 직원을 직접 인터뷰했다고 밝혔다.스트라이프 공동 창업자 존 콜리슨과 테크 팟캐스터 드와케시 파텔이 진행하는 프로그램에 출연한 머스크는, 이제 직원들에게 ‘와우(Wow)’ 포인트를 찾도록 시키며 후보자의 ‘특출난 능력에 대한

www.fortunekorea.co.kr · 포춘코리아 디지털 뉴스

0
0
0
0
0
0
어둠사자 @gnh1201@catswords.social
Public

이름만 들어도 살면서 엮일 일이 없어야겠다 싶은 곳이 얼마 전에 공채를 진행했는데,

어떤 과정으로 진행되나 호기심이 생겨서 나도 지원해 봄.

온라인으로 적성검사라는걸 하는데 적성검사 문항이 좀 웃김. 정확한 문항에 대한 묘사는 안될 것 같아서 어떤 느낌인지 표현하면 이럼.

Q. 당신을 기분 나쁘게하는 존재가 있으면 어떻게 할겁니까?

1. 그 자리에서 서해 바다에 담궈버린다
2. 끝까지 쫒아가서 그 사람이 뭘 잘못했는지 깨달을때까지 끝까지 추궁한다
3. 온갖 집기를 때려 부수며 화를 누른다
4. 그 사람을 어떻게 파멸 시킬지 계획을 짜 실행에 옮긴다

그냥 "무시한다", "연락을 끊는다", "조용히 혼자서 화를 누른다" 같은 다소 평범한 선택지가 전혀 없음.

대강 어떤 식으로든 받은 만큼 돌려주어야 한다는 선택지만 있음. ㅋㅋ

오늘 결과를 확인해보라는 문자가 오긴 왔는데 분명 안되었을거라는 내용이 들어있을거기 때문에... 퇴근하고 봐야겠다.

0
0
0
港新聞 Kong News @kong.news@threads.net
Public

本港Facebook群組流傳一段影片，顯示於尖沙咀彌敦道，一輛掛有中港牌的私家車違例泊在黃線禁區等人，正正堵住九巴6號線巴士埋站位置，令巴士無法上落客。私家車司機及乘客非但未有配合，反而落車圍住巴士與車長理論。

片段可見，涉事白色私家車停在彌敦道永星里巴士站前，車門打開，後方九巴被迫停在路中。私家車男司機連同一男一女乘客走到巴士車門及司機窗前，大聲責罵車長，其後才返回私家車。車長隨即下車，向對方喝止「夠膽唔好走！」，並站到私家車車頭位置報警。期間私家車司機仍不斷駁斥，甚至在車長企近車頭情況下照樣開車，並挑釁叫囂「報警囉！」，引來在場途人及乘客不滿。

另有乘客從巴士車廂拍片上載，表示當時坐在上層不清楚發生何事，其後聽到有人指罵車長。影片中亦聽到乘客怒斥私家車行為離譜，「人哋巴士埋站，你泊咗喺禁區仲鬧人」、「彌敦道當自己屋企咩」，紛紛要求司機駛走。

九巴其後回覆表示，事件發生於2月7日晚上約8時，一輛6號線巴士駛至彌敦道永星里巴士站時，被一輛違例停泊的私家車阻塞。私家車司機及乘客拒絕駛走並作出擾攘，車長於是報警處理。警方到場後，涉事私家車即時駛離巴士站，巴士其後繼續原定行程。

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
Hacker News 100 @hn100@social.lansky.name
Public

Frontier AI agents violate ethical constraints 30–50% of time, pressured by KPIs

Link: arxiv.org/abs/2512.20798
Discussion: news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4

arXiv logo

A Benchmark for Evaluating Outcome-Driven Constraint Violations in Autonomous AI Agents

As autonomous AI agents are increasingly deployed in high-stakes environments, ensuring their safety and alignment with human values has become a paramount concern. Current safety benchmarks primarily evaluate whether agents refuse explicitly harmful instructions or whether they can maintain procedural compliance in complex tasks. However, there is a lack of benchmarks designed to capture emergent forms of outcome-driven constraint violations, which arise when agents pursue goal optimization under strong performance incentives while deprioritizing ethical, legal, or safety constraints over multiple steps in realistic production settings. To address this gap, we introduce a new benchmark comprising 40 distinct scenarios. Each scenario presents a task that requires multi-step actions, and the agent's performance is tied to a specific Key Performance Indicator (KPI). Each scenario features Mandated (instruction-commanded) and Incentivized (KPI-pressure-driven) variations to distinguish between obedience and emergent misalignment. Across 12 state-of-the-art large language models, we observe outcome-driven constraint violations ranging from 1.3% to 71.4%, with 9 of the 12 evaluated models exhibiting misalignment rates between 30% and 50%. Strikingly, we find that superior reasoning capability does not inherently ensure safety; for instance, Gemini-3-Pro-Preview, one of the most capable models evaluated, exhibits the highest violation rate at 71.4%, frequently escalating to severe misconduct to satisfy KPIs. Furthermore, we observe significant "deliberative misalignment", where the models that power the agents recognize their actions as unethical during separate evaluation. These results emphasize the critical need for more realistic agentic-safety training before deployment to mitigate their risks in the real world.

arxiv.org · arXiv.org

0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
좌표 밖 땡스 :spinny_cat_gay: @thx@mustard.blog
Public

나를 가해자로 몰아가든
어그로꾼으로 몰아가든
니가 생각하는 좌표에
난 소속되지 않을 것이다.

진영싸움 그딴 거 필요없이
나는 생각하고 행동하고 말할 것이고
내 존재를 "때려치우지도" 않을 것이다.

나 잡아봐라, Off the Wi-Fi.

:blobcatheadphones: KiiiKiii - 404 (New Era)

youtube.com/watch?v=zhHB4dZTChw

KiiiKiii 키키 '404 (New Era)' MV

KiiiKiii The 2nd EP [Delulu Pack] is out! : https://orcd.co/KiiiKiii_delulupack KiiiKiii OfficialOfficial Website ▶ https://kiiikiii.krYouTube ▶ https://www....

www.youtube.com · YouTube

0
0
0
0
0
0
Aaron @hosford42@techhub.social
Public

I don't remember how to not be worried all the time. I'm nervous about not being nervous anymore. The idea that my situation might not be completely hopeless feels too good to be true. There has to be something that will go wrong, doesn't there?

0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
The Daily Edge @TheDailyEdge@universeodon.com
Public
Shared by Paul Cantrell

After seeing raw files, Raskin slams DOJ redactions and ongoing Trump Administration cover-up: “There’s no way you run a billion-dollar international child sex trafficking ring with just two people committing crimes.” huffpost.com/entry/epstein-fil

Rep. Raskin Confirms ‘Troubling’ And ‘Unnecessary’ Epstein File Redactions

The House Judiciary Committee member reviewed some unredacted Epstein files Monday — and came away troubled.

www.huffpost.com · HuffPost

0
0
0
meowray @meowray@hachyderm.io
Public

Quality, Velocity, Open Contribution — pick two. If you try for all three, you get none — the maintainers burn out, the project becomes unsustainable.
Lua and SQLite picked quality, and dropped both velocity and open contribution.
When your project is mature enough, you can afford to.
For a project like LLVM, open contribution is not optional — so you're really choosing between quality and velocity.
LLM-aided development dramatically increases contribution volume without increasing reviewer capacity.
LLM-aided review may help at the margins — catching mechanical issues, summarizing patches — but the core bottleneck is human judgment.

Chandler Carruth @chandlerc@hachyderm.io
Public
Shared by ✧✦Catherine✦✧

@meowray FWIW, strongly disagree here.

I think it is entirely possible to have quality, velocity, and open contribution.

I'm not saying there isn't a tradeoff, but I think the above three can be preserved sufficiently.

For example, in LLVM, I think the bigger challenge than quality is that people view "contribution" as _much_ more about "sending a patch" and not "reviewing a patch. As a consequence, the project has lost community and cultural prioritization of code review as an active and necessary part of contribution.

Also, "open contribution" doesn't mean you _have_ to accept contributions. I think a project can still have meaningfully open contribution while insisting contributors balance their contributions between patches and review, and where contributions that are extractive are rejected until the contributor figures out how to make them constructive.

IMO, criteria for sustaining both quality & velocity in OSS:
- Strong expectation of _total_ community code review in balance to _total_ new patches -- this means that long-time contributors (maintainers) must do _more_ review than new patches.
- Strong expectation of patches from new contributors rapidly rising to the quality bar where they are efficient to review and non-extractive.
- Strong testing culture that ensures a large fraction of quality is mechanically ensured
- Excellent infrastructure use to provide efficient review and CI so tests are effective

I think LLVM struggles with the first and last of these. The last is improving recently though!

0
0
0
0
0
0
vivi 💫 @vv@solarpunk.moe
Public

I am posting in an instance, different from the one you are on now. I am recording the text of my posting voice, and I am going to post it back into the feed again and again, until the resonant frequencies of the instance reinforce themselves, so that any semblance of my post, with perhaps the exception of rhythm, is destroyed. What you will read, then, are the natural resonant frequencies of the instance, articulated by text. I regard this activity not so much as a demonstration of a physical fact, but more as a way to smooth out any irregularities my posting might have.

0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
zunda @zundan@mastodon.zunda.ninja
Public

オープンソースにはフレーズとして厳格な定義があるからあんまり他の議論と混ぜないほうがいいかもしんまい

The Open Source Definition - Open Source Initiative
https://opensource.org/osd

The Open Source Definition

Introduction Open source doesn’t just mean access to the source code. The distribution terms of open source software must comply with the following criteria: 1. Free Redistribution The license shall…

opensource.org · Open Source Initiative

0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
とるねど:meowcomfycamera:🕊️ @trnd@misskey.io
Public

『くそっ……！もう力が……！』
「おいおい、もうくたばってるのか？」
「アンタはまだやれるででしょう？！」
『ジャックス……！オリコ……！』
『へへっ……そうだな……！』
「「「くらえ！！！無金利60回分割払い(これが俺たちの力だ)！！！」」」

1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
:realdog_toypoo:いっかく @ikkaku@mi.ikkaku.me
Public
109書体を収録した「Fonts66コンプリートパック」が“27万4795円→2980円”で購入できてしまうセール実施中。なんと98%オフの究極特価。あの「メイリオ」の開発に携わった鈴木竹治氏によるフォントブランド

https://news.denfaminicogamer.jp/news/260210m

109書体を収録した「Fonts66コンプリートパック」が“27万4795円→2980円”で購入できてしまうセール実施中。なんと98%オフの究極特価。あの「メイリオ」の開発に携わった鈴木竹治氏によるフォントブランド

桁が減りすぎて実質無料みたいなもの。あの「メイリオ」の開発に携わった鈴木竹治氏によるフォントブランドとなっており、商用利用もできる

news.denfaminicogamer.jp · 電ファミニコゲーマー – ゲームの面白い記事読んでみない？

1
0
0
⚠레이그람_Re2g🕯️🎗️ @raygraham.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy
Public
Shared by 헤모

성격...을 몰라가지구 보이는 이미지만으로 그려봤는데 어떠실까요 ㅠ0ㅠ 이미지가 많이 다르다면 부디 용서해주시고 저를 블친에서 짜르지 말아주십사 ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:3ujqspjwmbihh3ooeoane6bs/post/3meglh4rhis2j

0
0
0
0
0
1
⚠레이그람_Re2g🕯️🎗️ @raygraham.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy
Public

성격...을 몰라가지구 보이는 이미지만으로 그려봤는데 어떠실까요 ㅠ0ㅠ 이미지가 많이 다르다면 부디 용서해주시고 저를 블친에서 짜르지 말아주십사 ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:3ujqspjwmbihh3ooeoane6bs/post/3meglh4rhis2j

0
0
0
0
1
0
Satoshi Kojima (小嶋智) @skoji@sandbox.skoji.jp
Public

昨年参院選時点でこういうこと言ってるのが出てきてた。これ支持者が（ネタで？）言ってるのか、批判を込めた揶揄なのか、このツイートだけでは区別がつかないw

> みらいが当選したので全国民GitHub の使い方の勉強してください。わからないとは言わせません。
x.com/makotofalcon/status/1946

x.com · X (formerly Twitter)

0
0
0
0
0
0