What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

[손솔 수석대변인 서면브리핑] 국힘·개혁신당의 ‘혐오 공조’, 저열하다! jinboparty.com/pages/?p=15&... 최근 이준석 대표가 선거기간 중 외국인의 온라인 댓글 작성을 제한하는 정보통신망법 개정안을 대표발의했습니다. 이른바 ‘외국인 댓글 제한법’입니다. 해당 법안에 국민의힘 장동혁 대표, 나경원 의원 등이 공동발의자로 참여했습니다. 이른바 국힘과 개혁신당의 ‘혐오 공조’입니다.

0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0

블루스카이 1.116 업데이트 - 드디어 임시 저장 기능이 생겼습니다! - gif 재생 방식을 전통적인 방식으로 변경했습니다 - 성능 개선 및 버그 수정이 이루어졌습니다 - 블루스카이 커뮤니티의 아티스트 @odpomery.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy의 작품으로 환영 화면을 업데이트했습니다(로그인 하지 않은 상태에서 볼 수 있습니다 자세한것은 타래 참조)

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:z72i7hdynmk6r22z27h6tvur/post/3mehblstckk2e

0
0
1
0

쿠팡 개인정보를 유출한 전 직원이 약 3370만건의 계정 정보를 빼낸 것은 물론, 고객 이름과 전화번호 등이 포함된 배송지 목록을 1억5천만건 가까이 조회한 사실이 확인됐습니다. 지난해 말 “유출된 개인정보가 3000건에 불과하다”고 발표했던 쿠팡의 해명과 달리 천문학적인 피해 규모가 드러난 셈입니다.

[속보] 쿠팡 유출자, 배송지 1억5천만 건 들춰봤다…...

0

本港Facebook群組流傳一段影片,顯示於尖沙咀彌敦道,一輛掛有中港牌的私家車違例泊在黃線禁區等人,正正堵住九巴6號線巴士埋站位置,令巴士無法上落客。私家車司機及乘客非但未有配合,反而落車圍住巴士與車長理論。

片段可見,涉事白色私家車停在彌敦道永星里巴士站前,車門打開,後方九巴被迫停在路中。私家車男司機連同一男一女乘客走到巴士車門及司機窗前,大聲責罵車長,其後才返回私家車。車長隨即下車,向對方喝止「夠膽唔好走!」,並站到私家車車頭位置報警。期間私家車司機仍不斷駁斥,甚至在車長企近車頭情況下照樣開車,並挑釁叫囂「報警囉!」,引來在場途人及乘客不滿。

另有乘客從巴士車廂拍片上載,表示當時坐在上層不清楚發生何事,其後聽到有人指罵車長。影片中亦聽到乘客怒斥私家車行為離譜,「人哋巴士埋站,你泊咗喺禁區仲鬧人」、「彌敦道當自己屋企咩」,紛紛要求司機駛走。

九巴其後回覆表示,事件發生於2月7日晚上約8時,一輛6號線巴士駛至彌敦道永星里巴士站時,被一輛違例停泊的私家車阻塞。私家車司機及乘客拒絕駛走並作出擾攘,車長於是報警處理。警方到場後,涉事私家車即時駛離巴士站,巴士其後繼續原定行程。

0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0

we have a phrase in the labor movement: "don't panic, organize"

if we apply it, it works every time

it quells existential dread, builds solidarity, and makes things better for the working class

remember, "rebellions are built on hope"

don't let THE MAN get u down

we can do amazing things if we bring our care, joy, kindness, and equanimity to the fore

0
0
0
0

저번에 베이징 동계올림픽때 개막식이었나 중국 내 소수민족 다 나와서 저마다 전통의상 입고 퍼포먼스 하는 장면에서 조선족이 입고 나온 한복 가지고 중국이 한복 뺏으려한다!!! 하는 플로우가 트위터에서 돈 적이 있었는데 진짜 뭐랄까 뇌가 정지되는 느낌이었음 아니 중국 내 소수민족의 전통의상이라고요 조선족이니까 당연히 한복 입고 나오지;;

0
0
0
0
0
0

Each time a new privacy-invasive
feature like facial scanning is implemented, if people in majority comply and accept to use it, it will soon become normality, and other options will be marginalized or even removed entirely.

If each time a new privacy-invasive
feature is implemented people opted to refuse it, it would soon be discontinued.

Each individual opposition to privacy-invasive features matters.

It is an act of self-protection but,
perhaps even more importantly,
it is also an act of protest.

A protest against the normalization of mass surveillance and the loss of privacy rights.

The fact that there are other cameras around doesn't mean that more cameras or additional scanning is not making things even worse.

If we do not refuse,
if we do not fight for our privacy rights,
we will lose them all.

@Em0nM4stodonEm :official_verified:

> "It is an act of self-protection but,
perhaps even more importantly,
it is also an act of protest."

It is also our democratic duty to protect those who can't fight for themselves, who are in a minority and as such in an inferior position to defend themselves against attacks aiming at their human rights or personal privacy.

It's a duty of the majority to protect minorities - because, in a democracy, majorities change...

@catsaladCat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) :paw::paw:

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Telling people to "just use Linux" hasn't broken the OS duopoly. It doesn't matter that I get better fps gaming on Linux, or that I don't get ads baked into the OS itself.

Telling people to "just use Signal" hasn't broken Facebook's chokehold on messaging. It doesn't matter that using Signal is *exactly* as difficult as using WhatsApp, for fuck's sake, WhatsApp uses Signal libraries internally!

Many people actively prefer the corporate tech they see in as, that aligns with corporate power.

0
1
0
0

Each time a new privacy-invasive
feature like facial scanning is implemented, if people in majority comply and accept to use it, it will soon become normality, and other options will be marginalized or even removed entirely.

If each time a new privacy-invasive
feature is implemented people opted to refuse it, it would soon be discontinued.

Each individual opposition to privacy-invasive features matters.

It is an act of self-protection but,
perhaps even more importantly,
it is also an act of protest.

A protest against the normalization of mass surveillance and the loss of privacy rights.

The fact that there are other cameras around doesn't mean that more cameras or additional scanning is not making things even worse.

If we do not refuse,
if we do not fight for our privacy rights,
we will lose them all.

@Em0nM4stodonEm :official_verified:

💯!!!

I recently tried to check in for an international flight online. It asked for a picture of my passport, with a disclaimer [paraphrasing] that my passport info would be sent to a third party for processing.

That's a hard pass for me. I'd rather wait in line at the airport then have some third party I don't know about have access to my passport info

0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1