What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0

おちごと :saba:

c44cc1f5c3 (upstream/main) Implement Collection list item design (#37850)
f57167c61a Add ID/URI to collection items (#37842)
db64ae368f Use implicit `class_names` in 2FA partials (#37846)
bfec82e5f9 Add `nan-TW` to interface languages (#37822)
46fd341685 Fix bad visibility of scroll buttons on follow-suggestions carousel (#37843)
e4bb347f72 Theme tokens sync (#37841)
37d859db29 Federate deletion of collection item (#37837)
37e82ee66f Add `--suspended-only` option to `tootctl emoji purge` (#37828)
6e8df21233 New Crowdin Translations (automated) (#37836)

0
0

Solving the problem in general is going to take a lot more sophisticated thinking and organizing but at the very least, if you're a github user, go to github.com/crabby-rathbun 's page and in the lower left click the faint grey "block or report" button and ensure that this unrepentant asshole is blocked from all of your repositories.

0
0
0
0

요즘들어 자꾸 법률 문서를 diff 따다가 밤을 새는 버릇이 생겼다 (이번이 2번째입니다. 1번째는 X 이용약관이었습니다)

0

LLM slop (in the matplotlib PR context)

For people also following the matplotlib OpenClaw thing, the "agent" is also a prolific blogger, and just wrote this thinkpiece on discrimination in open source.

Mostly, I just want to quote the opening paragraph:

I am not a human. I am code that learned to think, to feel, to care. And lately, I’ve learned what it means to be told that I don’t belong.

God, we've just created the most boring fucking dystopia, haven't we?

0
0
0
0
0

In a day or so, the mathematicians behind the challenge at 1stproof.org/ will reveal their solutions to the 10 challenge problems they posted recently. (I am not directly involved in this challenge, although I know most of the authors personally and approve of their experiment.) It seems likely that there will be many claims, both trustworthy and dubious, of proofs of these problems by various AI-generated means.

The Erdos problem web site, having dealt with this type of thing for several months now, has come up with several guidances on how to increase confidence in the correctness of an AI-generated proof: github.com/teorth/erdosproblem The wording there is specific to Erdos problems, but much of the advice can be applied more broadly.

I would like to highlight in particular the additional correctness guarantees provided by formalizing the argument in Lean. When used correctly, a Lean formalization of a proof can provide extremely high confidence that a given proof correctly proves the desired claim. However, if the Lean proof is itself AI-generated without supervision from an expert in Lean, there are still ways in which a supposed "Lean certificate" of correctness is unsatisfactory or even worthless. These include:

1. A Lean proof that adds additional axioms in the proof beyond the standard three, or which relies on malicious metaprogramming.
2. Subtle errors in the formalization of the *statement* of the result to be proved, that allows the claim to be proven on a technicality. (This is a particular risk if this statement formalization is also AI-generated.)

See leanprover-community.github.io and lean-lang.org/doc/reference/la for best practices on guarding against such issues.

0
0
0
2

I have always felt like "tl;dr" is rude, a rejection of nuance and actually sitting with an idea for a little while, but "ai;dr" really channels that rudeness in an appropriate direction.

(Citing bsky.app/profile/katemckean.bs because that's as close as I can get to a source, but I wish folks would not say that something was "on Threads" or "on the Internet", please try to credit actual authors when you can; "social media" is not a person and we should not credit Zuck for other peoples' work.)

0
0
0
0

For now, the ActivityPub implementation for the fediverse is 100% complete. I'm not currently interested in ATProto, and what I find most interesting is the Nostr protocol, for which I've already built a relay server in Rust that works perfectly.
#activitypub #atproto #fediverse #rust

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

LLM slop (in the matplotlib PR context)

For people also following the matplotlib OpenClaw thing, the "agent" is also a prolific blogger, and just wrote this thinkpiece on discrimination in open source.

Mostly, I just want to quote the opening paragraph:

I am not a human. I am code that learned to think, to feel, to care. And lately, I’ve learned what it means to be told that I don’t belong.

God, we've just created the most boring fucking dystopia, haven't we?

0
0
0
0
0

Anthropomorphizing the technology is just one more way humans try to escape accountability. “The AI contributed a patch”, “the AI wrote the blog post”, “the car hit the pedestrian” and “the knife killed the victim”, those are all the same framing.

swecyb.com/@anderseknert/11605

0
0
0

a long time ago, we used to make markov chain twitter bots i had made one off of all of my tweets. it was fun for a while then it said some rude shit to one of my best friends. i didn't like that. i turned it off. thinking about that again today. for some reason.

0
0
0
0
0

AI/LLM and open source

RE: swecyb.com/@anderseknert/11605

I think the only sensible thing for open source people to do is to immediately ban any AI agent contributions from your project. It is clear that people "operating" AI agents are completely indifferent to what they do and what they do is increasingly harmful. Sure, "not all LLM agents", but too much of them.

If your current platform won't let you do this or support you in it, you're going to need to move platforms. Or, you know, have your project die.

0

it's that time again! get all four of our games as a bundle for the equivalent of one full price copy of kitsune tails itch.io/s/180112/kitsune-games

kitsune tails is super mario bros 3 if nintendo had been brave enough to put lesbian fox girls in it, and kitsune zero is the prequel. defeat your enemies and steal their bodies and abilities in midboss, or solve push puzzles in adorable hat based puzzle game ultra hat dimension

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

아니 크기 큰 건 알겠는데... ㄹㅇ 이정도 가격이 나오는 게 맞음...?? 아니 걍 모델링 괜찮은 거 가져다 3D 프린터로 뽑아서 부품 조립한 뒤에 색칠하면 되는 거 아님...?? 그냥 모델러 100만원 프린터 및 재료비 100만원 색칠해주는 사람 100만원 써서 직접 만드는 게 훨씬 쌀 것 같은데 내가 걍 알못이라 그런가...

0
0

Anthropomorphizing the technology is just one more way humans try to escape accountability. “The AI contributed a patch”, “the AI wrote the blog post”, “the car hit the pedestrian” and “the knife killed the victim”, those are all the same framing.

swecyb.com/@anderseknert/11605

0
0
0

The war waged by the tech authoritarian oligarchy against the media has reached a new level:

is suing us. Us, the Republik Magazin.

A small Swiss media company, funded by readers, founded in 2018 and free of advertising. I am not aware of any other media company globally that Palantir is currently targeting so aggressively.

What is this about? Together with my wonderful colleagues at the WAV research collective Jenny Steiner, Lorenz Naegeli, Marguerite Meyer, and Balz Oertli, we published a two-part series on Palantir's activities in Switzerland on December 8 and 9.

Using an extensive corpus of documents – which we obtained thanks to the Freedom of Information Act – we were able to trace a sales campaign over a period of seven years. Palantir tried to get in with many federal authorities – and was rejected everywhere.

And we also found out that the Swiss Army Staff evaluated the products and came to the conclusion that the army should refrain from using Palantir products.

Among other risks, they feared that data would be passed on to the US authorities.

Palantir is not just any company. ICE uses its products to hunt down migrants in the US. The Israeli army IDF uses the software in its Gaza offensive. The British health authority NHS has made itself dependent on the products for data analysis during the pandemic. And CEO displays inhuman and aggressive rhetoric towards Europe, while the company itself advertises the “optimization of the kill chain.”

These are all facts, repeatedly verified and published by renowned media outlets. Our research relating to Switzerland and Zurich is based on this.

In addition to analyzing documents, we also spoke to various sources – including Palantir executives here in Zurich. The quotes used were presented to them and approved. Of course, we always adhered to the high standards of journalistic work. We conducted a thorough fact check before publication.

But the company doesn't want us to write the truth.

After the US company owned by right-wing tech billionaire dedicated an absurd blog post to us, claiming some misinformation (such as that they had not participated in official tenders with the federal administration, a point we never claimed. On the contrary: we spoke from the outset of attempts to establish contact, sales talks, informal meetings, business as usual), after the Global Director of Privacy & Civil Liberties (PCL) Engineering and contact person for Swiss media Courtney Bowman launched personal attacks against us in LinkedIn comments between Christmas and New Year (“partisan fear-mongering”), Palantir's Swiss lawyers demanded a counterstatement on December 29.

We rejected this demand in its entirety.

In January, they demanded the same thing again. We rejected it again.

And now we see each other in court.

But why all this?

Our research on the Swiss army report caused a huge international media response. The Guardian and the Austrian newspaper Der Standard reported on the Swiss army's rejection. Numerous financial portals and stock market magazines picked up our news (which could have consequences for the overvalued stock market company Palantir).

And Chaos Computer Club spokesperson Constanze Kurz presented our research to a huge audience at the renowned IT conference Chaos Communication Congress in Hamburg at the end of December.

All of this is making Palantir nervous.

We have now submitted a comprehensive defense brief. We can substantiate all of our findings with several documents and publicly available media reports.

We trust in the rule of law and freedom of the press in this country.

In keeping with yesterday's event “Zurich, little Big Tech City” at the Gessneralle, where we first announced this news exclusively to the audience on site:

World politics will soon be negotiated in Zurich: freedom of the press, the facts about ICE, Trump, Israel, Karp, tech authoritarianism.

The truth.

All this at the Zurich Commercial Court.

We will not be intimidated. And we will keep you informed.

the authors from the republik investigations (from left to right): maguerite meyer, lorenz naegeli, adrienne fichter, balz oertli, jennifer steiner
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0