What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0

๐Ÿ• 2026-02-20 18:00 UTC

๐Ÿ“ฐ ใ‚ฏใƒฉใ‚ฆใƒ‰ๅž‹ใ‚ณใƒผใƒ‡ใ‚ฃใƒณใ‚ฐใ‚จใƒผใ‚ธใ‚งใƒณใƒˆใฎๆ™‚ไปฃใŒใพใŸๆฅใ‚‹ (๐Ÿ‘ 99)

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Local coding agents hit cognitive limits. Cloud-based agents like Devin may return as the solution to handle complexity beyond local tools.
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท ๋กœ์ปฌ ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ์—์ด์ „ํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์ธ์ง€ ๋ถ€ํ•˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„์— ๋„๋‹ฌ. Devin ๊ฐ™์€ ํด๋ผ์šฐ๋“œํ˜• ์—์ด์ „ํŠธ๊ฐ€ ๋ณต์žก์„ฑ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์‚ฌ๋กœ ์žฌ๋ถ€์ƒํ•  ์ „๋ง.

๐Ÿ”— zenn.dev/ubie_dev/articles/925

0
1

One way to know Claude is a joke is it canโ€™t even get right questions about itself. Asked it how could I tell it to stop asking if it could do any read operation on a directory. It told me how to configure it. I asked it the change needed restarting or if it would pick it up. It told me it would pick it up, there was no need to restart, changes were immediately. After asking several times for more permissions and I insisting to not ask, it finally admitted it required a restart.

0
0
0
9
0

๋„ค์ด๋ฒ„์—์„œ ์ผ์ฃผ์ผ์— 70์‹œ๊ฐ„์”ฉ ์ผํ•˜๋˜ ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ ์ปด๊ณต+์ปด๊ณต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ๋ฐ•์‚ฌ ์ž„์›ํ•œํ…Œ ์ธ๊ตฌ ์ €์ถœ์ƒ ์ •์ฑ…์„ ๋งก๊ธฐ๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉด ๋‹น์—ฐํžˆ ๊ด€์•…ํŒ๊ต 40๋Œ€ ๋‚จ์„ฑ ๊ธฐํ˜ผ์ž ๊ธฐ์ค€์˜ ์ •์ฑ…์ด ๋‚˜์˜ค๊ฒ ์ง€.

0

new from me: FR#154 - Search and Community

@HolosSocial shut down their fediverse search engine, over concerns that some users have the flag for being indexable turned on without consciously enabling it.

If the consent flag Holos relied on frequently doesn't represent consent, that's a problem, because Mastodon's FASP project relies on the same.

connectedplaces.online/reports

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0

FR#154 โ€“ Search and Community

Last week, Holos Social quietly shut down Holos Discover, a fediverse search engine built on ActivityPub. It had put in serious effort to allow for user consent, it only indexed public posts from accounts with the indexable flag enabled, appeared as a visible follower, processed deletions and edits in real time, and excluded accounts that were locked or had in their bio. This is about as close you can get to building a consent-respecting search engine in the current fediverse.

Community members pointed out that the indexable flag is enabled by default on many instances, which means that a significant number of accounts with the flag set never made a deliberate choice to be indexed. The flag thatโ€™s supposed to signal โ€œthis person consents to being searchableโ€ frequently signals โ€œthis personโ€™s server admin didnโ€™t change the defaultโ€, and on a protocol-level, there is no difference between these two options.

Search and indexing projects on the fediverse tend to end the same way, from early full-text indexing attempts through Searchtodonโ€˜s careful experiment with personal timeline search in 2023, to FediOnFireโ€˜s relay-based firehose display earlier this year. Not all of this resistance was unjustified: Maven imported over a million fediverse posts without notice and ran AI sentiment analysis on them, which is a far cry from what Holos was building. But the community response has rarely distinguished between projects that deliberately violate consent and projects that try to respect it. Bridgy Fed survived a similar cycle by shifting to an opt-in model, but itโ€™s the exception. The norm against search was established during periods of intense community backlash that sometimes crossed into coordinated harassment. These backlashes have grown less intense as people seem to have largely moved on. See for example how Searchtodon got an intense backlash in early 2023, and I explicitly flagged an offline-first client that could do effectively the same in fall 2025 that did not get any backlash. Still, the expectation for backlash persists as internalized caution.


The community correctly identified that the indexable flag doesnโ€™t reliably represent individual consent. Helen Nissenbaumโ€™s work on contextual integrity makes the case that privacy isnโ€™t about secrecy but about appropriate information flows: posting on Mastodon carries an implicit norm about who will encounter that post and why, and violating that norm is a privacy breach even if the post was technically public. Daniel Solove and Woodrow Hartzog make a similar legal argument, saying that publicly available data is still regularly protected by privacy law, and that accessibility alone doesnโ€™t license arbitrary downstream use.

But the only available response to discovering that the indexable flag is unreliable, treating all defaults as non-consent, has some major side effects. It removes the possibility that a server admin could legitimately say โ€œour community values public discovery, so we set defaults that support that.โ€The protocol has no way to represent whether a default was set deliberately or by inertia. So the community norm treats them the same, which in practice means that a server admin who says โ€˜our community is about public discoveryโ€™ gets treated identically to one who never looked at the settings page. This results in a view of fediverse servers that only contains individual choices, and where a community deciding collectively to be discoverable is not an available category.

This is a strange outcome for a network thatโ€™s supposed to enable governance diversity across communities. Mastodon published a blog post this week where Executive Director Felix Hlatky says the mission is to โ€œconnect the world through thriving online communitiesโ€. But this current structure for how to signal consent for data processing can only recognise the individual, and has no mechanism for a community to signal anything.

There is also something patronizing about the framing that treats defaults as equivalent to non-consent. If we take seriously the idea that servers are communities with governance, then an admin who configures their server for public discovery is making a governance decision on behalf of their community, not failing to notice a checkbox. Treating all defaults as non-consent refuses to recognize that decision as legitimate, which undermines exactly the kind of community-level agency that a decentralized network is supposed to enable. As I argued in another article this week, where community lives in these networks is an open question, but it canโ€™t be answered if the architecture only recognizes individuals.

Meanwhile, there are about half a dozen ways to harvest fediverse data with no accountability and no opt-out attached, and all of them are effectively condoned because they happen out of sight. What the current setup actually does is push practices for data gathering out of sight, where no opt-out mechanisms exist, instead of creating conditions where accountable tools can be built in the open. The current system is better at protecting the communityโ€™s idea of itself as a place that takes consent seriously, than it is at actually protecting users.


Mastodonโ€™s Fediverse Discovery Providers project, or Fediverse Auxiliary Service Providers (FASP), is building a specification for pluggable search and discovery services that any fediverse server can connect to, funded by an NGI Search grant. It aims to solve the same problem as Holos, providing discovery infrastructure that can be used by other servers.

The FASP specification explicitly states that providers will โ€œonly ingest content from creators who opted in to discovery in the first placeโ€ and will โ€œrespect this setting,โ€ referring to the same indexable signal that Holos relied on. The spec is well-designed in other respects: it is decentralized, allows servers to choose among competing providers, separates content URIs from content fetching in ways that limit data exposure, and requires signed fetch requests so servers can identify and block specific providers. But the problem is that the consent mechanism at its foundation is one the community has already explicitly said it doesnโ€™t trust.

If the Holos episode established that the indexable flag is insufficient because it canโ€™t guarantee individual deliberate consent, then FASPโ€™s privacy model has the same hole. It shows that the lack of search and discovery is a governance problem, not a technical problem. Holos and their experience building a search engine shows that the โ€˜indexableโ€™ flag is not sufficient. The technical infrastructure for discovery is being built, but the governance infrastructure for consent, a way to distinguish deliberate community choices from defaults, is not discussed at all.

connectedplaces.online/reports

Doors of an electricity dispatch building
0
0

ใฆใ„ใ†ใ‹ๆŠ€่ก“้ฉๆ–ฐใจใ‹ใฉใ‚Œใ ใ‘ใ‚ใฃใฆใ‚‚ไธ€ๅ‘ใซๅŠดๅƒๆ™‚้–“ใŒๆธ›ใ‚‹ๆฐ—้…ใŒใชใ„ใฎใฏใชใœใ‹ใ‚’ใพใ˜ใ‚ใซ่€ƒใˆใ‚ˆใ†ใจใ—ใฆใ‚‹ใฎใŒใ€Žใƒ–ใƒซใ‚ทใƒƒใƒˆใƒปใ‚ธใƒงใƒ–ใ€ใงใ™ใŸใถใ‚“(6ๅ‰ฒใพใง่ชญใ‚“ใ 

0
0
0
0
0

What did I just read?

"He had a chest of drawers, entirely empty except for a lint roller, pens, and in one corner, a pink vibrator. โ€œItโ€™s for girls, you know,โ€ said Roy. โ€œI used to use this one on my ex.โ€ There were also some objects that didnโ€™t seem to belong in a frat house. In one of the common areas, a shelving unit was completely empty except for an anime figurine. You could peer up her plastic skirt & see the plastic underwear molded around her plastic buttocks"

harpers.org/archive/2026/03/ch

Suddenly, Roy seemed to acknowledge my presence. He offered me a tour. There was something he very badly wanted to impress on me, which was that Cluely cultivates a fratty, tech-bro atmosphere. Their pantry was piled high with bottles of something called Core Power Elite. I was offered a protein bar. The inside of the wrapper read DAILY INTENTIONS: BE MY BOSS SELF. โ€œWe're big believers in protein,โ€ Roy said.
โ€œItโ€™s impossible to get fat at Cluely. Nothing here has any fat.โ€ The
kitchen table was stacked with Labubu dolls. โ€œItโ€™s aesthetics,โ€ Roy
explained. โ€œWomen love Labubus, so we have Labubus.โ€ He showed me
his bedroom, which was in the office; many Cluely staffers also lived
there. Everything was gray, although there wasnโ€™t much. โ€œI'm a big
believer in minimalism,โ€ he said. โ€œActually, no, I'm not. Not at all. I just
donโ€™t really care about interior decoration.โ€  ... There were also some objects that didnโ€™t seem to belong in a frat house. In one of the common areas, a shelving unit was completely empty except for an anime figurine. You could peer up her plastic skirt and see the plastic underwear molded around her plastic buttocks. More figurines in frilly dresses seemed to have been scattered at random
throughout the building. Roy showed me his Hinge profile. He was looking for a โ€œ5ยฐ2, asian, pre-med, matcha-loving, funny, watches anime, white dog having, intelligent, ambitious, well dressed, CLEAN 19-21 year old.โ€ One picture showed him cuddling a giant Labubu.
0
0
0
0

ใƒกใ‚ฟใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒŸใƒณใ‚ฐใใฎใ‚‚ใฎใงใฏใชใ„ใจๆ€ใ†ใ‚“ใ ใ‘ใฉใ€ใใ‚Œใฏใใ‚Œใจใ—ใฆใƒกใ‚ฟใชๆ–นใซ่กŒใใŒใกใซใชใฃใฆใ‚‚ใŠใ‹ใ—ใใฏใชใ„ใจๆ€ใ†(ใ“ใฎๅ ดๅˆใฎใƒกใ‚ฟใฃใฆใชใ‚“ใ ๏ผŸ

0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0

Friends!

There is a TON of improvements we could make to Private Mentions (often called DMs on other platforms) e.g.
* getting them out of the public timeline
* Having a stronger notification tied to the Private Mention tab
* (amount other things)

But here is my MAIN question: How critical is it that these message are encrypted? I'm not against encryption! It's just complex and will take time. If we were to make some UX changes as a first pass WITHOUT encryption would you be OK with that (at least for now?)

If you MUST have encryption, that's fine, please do me the favor of replying explaining why you need it.

0
50
0
0
0
1
0
10
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0

Because of the summer beta season, I reset several iOS test devices at least twice a year.

You know what step of that process I havenโ€™t seen go smoothly in YEARS? Disabling Find My & Activation Lock.

Type the password, hit the button, wait forever.

You can cancel and try again, and then itโ€™ll work, but what?!

Is it just my iCloud account(s) this affects or is Reset not on one of the regular QA scripts at Apple?

0

[็พŽ๊ด€์„ธ ์œ„๋ฒ•ํŒ๊ฒฐ] ํŠธ๋Ÿผํ”„์— ํž˜์‹ฃ๋˜ ๋Œ€๋ฒ•, ๊ฒฐ์ •์  ์‚ฌ์•ˆ์„œ ๋ฐœ๋ชฉ ์žก์•˜๋‹ค
(์›Œ์‹ฑํ„ด=์—ฐํ•ฉ๋‰ด์Šค) ์กฐ์ค€ํ˜• ํŠนํŒŒ์› = ๋„๋„๋“œ ํŠธ๋Ÿผํ”„ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ๋Œ€ํ†ต๋ น 2๊ธฐ ์ถœ๋ฒ”์„ ์ „ํ›„ํ•ด ํŠธ๋Ÿผํ”„ ๋Œ€ํ†ต๋ น์˜ ์–ด์  ๋‹ค์— ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•œ ํŒ๊ฒฐ์„ ์ด์–ด์˜จ ๋ฏธ ์—ฐ๋ฐฉ ๋Œ€๋ฒ•...
yna.co.kr/view/AKR202601090064

0
0
17
1