What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0

애 낳으면 엄마 연봉 33% 깎여...여성, 남성보다 130일 더 일해야 같은 연봉 www.womennews.co.kr/news/article... "결혼과 출산은 성별 격차를 더 벌린다. 결혼 후 여성 임금은 남성보다 평균 8.9% 낮아진다. 첫 아이를 낳고 10년이 지나면 그 차이는 33.4%까지 커진다. 육아휴직을 쓰는 아빠(7.4%)는 엄마(73.2%)의 10분의 1 수준이다. 돌봄 부담이 여전히 여성에게 집중되면서 경력과 소득에서 불이익이 고스란히 쌓이는 현실이다."

애 낳으면 엄마 연봉 33% 깎여...여성, 남성보다 ...

0
1
0
2
0

앗! 나도 해커스펍 기여자? Hackers Pub 기여자 모임 스프린트

Hackers' Pub 리뉴얼, 손꼽아 기다리고 계시지 않으신가요? Hackers' Pub, 한 번쯤 직접 기여해 보고 싶다는 생각, 해보신 적 없으신가요? Hackers' Pub, 이용하면서 어딘가 아쉽다 느꼈던 부분, 혹시 있지 않으셨나요? 이번 스프린트 모임은 리뉴얼 진도도 팍팍 빼면서, 기여자들끼리 서로 얼굴도 익히고 친분도 쌓는 자리입니다. 부담 없이 참여해 주세요. 모임은 서울특별시 성동구 상원길 26, 뚝섬역 5번 출구 근처 어딘가에 있는 튜링의 사과에서 진행합니다. 일정은 3월 1일 ~ 3월 2일. 모여서 각자 편하게 해커스펍 기여하다가 가시면 됩니다. 몸만 오시면 됩니다. 비용은 튜링의 사과 이용료만 챙겨 주시면 돼요. 감사합니다. 이 글은 연합우주를 위한 모임 개최 서비스 moim.live의 첫 게시글로 영광스럽게 공유합니다

📅 2026-03-01T02:00:00.000Z — 2026-03-02T10:00:00.000Z

Organized by: @hongminhee@hollo.social

View event details

1
0
0

個人的には、こっちの人のほうがわかるかなと思った。 https://uiuret.hatenablog.com/entry/2026/02/22/024509 自分も変わったと感じるけど、おかしくなる手前だし、必要がないなら、おかしくなる前にやめたほうが良いとおもっている。自分が追いつけないことがわかっているから、AI並列でやるのを試していない。AI並列、見た感じおもしろそうだなと思うし、それで成果がでるのもわかるけど、それおもしろいんだろうかと思っている。

0
0
0
0
千萬別買 .online 網域 https://www.0xsid.com/blog/online-tld-is-pain

作者自認是 .com 派,卻因為 Namecheap 的促銷(每個帳號可免費選一個 .online 或 .site,只需付 ICANN(網際網路名稱與號碼指派機構)費用約 0.20 美元)而破例,替一個小專案買了 .online 頂級網域(TLD, Top-Level Domain)。他把網域接到 Cloudflare 與 GitHub,架了一個只有 App Store 連結、截圖與簡短文字的落地頁。幾週後他查看流量才發現 48 小時內完全沒人造訪,開站時先看到整頁紅底的「不安全網站」警告(Google Safe Browsing,Google 的惡意網站黑名單服務),硬是略過警告後又變成「site not found」,看起來像是網域突然消失。

他先從註冊商 Namecheap 檢查,帳號內顯示網域仍在、到期日正常、名稱伺服器也指向 Cloudflare;但用 dig(DNS 查詢工具)查 dig NS getwisp.online +short 卻得到空結果,再查 WHOIS(網域註冊查詢)看到狀態是 serverHold。作者也釐清 serverHold 是由註冊局(registry)設定、比註冊商可控制的 clientHold 更難處理;更糟的是,他完全沒收到任何來自註冊局、註冊商、代管方或 Google 的通知。Namecheap 回覆指出停用並非他們所為,而是該 TLD 的註冊局直接把網域「上鎖」,常見原因是涉及濫用;作者轉向 .online 的註冊局 Radix 求助,得到的說法是:網域因被列入 Google Safe Browsing 黑名單而遭停用,必須先依指示完成下架(delist)才能解鎖。

問題隨即變成典型的驗證死循環:要向 Google 申訴並請求重新審查,必須先在 Google Search Console(Google 搜尋控制台)驗證網域所有權,而驗證方式通常要新增 DNS TXT 或 CNAME 紀錄;但 serverHold 會讓網域在註冊局層級不再解析,導致 Google 看不到驗證紀錄、也爬不到頁面內容,甚至出現「No valid pages were submitted」。註冊局堅持要等 Google 解除標記才會恢復解析,Google 又要求先驗證所有權才受理正式審查,作者只能四處填寫誤判回報表單,並向註冊局申請「暫時解除」讓 Google 得以檢視內容。最後他把教訓歸納為:避免「奇怪的」新 TLD、網域一買就先在 Search Console 預先完成驗證,以及即使只是落地頁也要有基本可用性監控;同時批評 Radix 與 Google 的「零通知、零緩衝」封鎖與解封流程,讓無辜者幾乎無從自救。

留言區的共鳴點是「就算你不是 Google 客戶,也會被 Google 的黑箱治理波及」:不少人把這類無預警封鎖視為平台權力外溢與服務劣化(enshittification),尤其當註冊局或註冊商把 Google Safe Browsing 當成自動停用觸發器時,等同讓整個 TLD 對嚴肅用途變得不可用。也有人提出折衷想法:快速停用或許能降低惡意網站危害,但必須配套更合理的解封機制,例如提供短暫寬限期、至少允許網域持有人繼續設定 TXT 以完成所有權驗證,否則只會製造更多冤案。討論也延伸到新 TLD 的其他風險:安全廠商把某些 TLD 當「惡意 TLD」直接封鎖、續約費用突增(例如 .icu 從 20 美元跳到 220、美國有人 .dev 逾期不到一天續約變 800、美金與 .online 續約變貴等),以及註冊商品質下滑(有人提到 Namecheap、Gandi 被私募基金影響),並交換替代選擇如 Porkbun、Bookmyname(Scaleway)、Infomaniak 等;也有人提醒「永遠只買 .com」未必現實,改用 ccTLD(國碼頂級網域)有時規範更明確、申訴管道也可能更可依循。

👥 38 則討論、評論 💬
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47151233
0
0
1

Allegations of a Chinese nuclear blast may reignite weapons testing

In the afternoon on 22 June 2020, a seismic station in eastern Kazakhstan registered two small earthquakes 12 seconds 
apart near China’s Lop Nur nuclear test site. Closely spaced jolts can arise from underground explosions followed by a cavity collapse, or simply from earthquakes. But U.S. officials this month asserted the shaking was from a clandestine nuclear detonation—




an accusation that could sound the starting gun for a new global arms race. 

Ballistic missiles are brandished during a 2025 military parade in Beijing. China is rapidly expanding its nuclear arsenal.Liu Jinhai/Xinhua via Getty Images
0
0
0
0
千萬別買 .online 網域 https://www.0xsid.com/blog/online-tld-is-pain

作者自認是 .com 派,卻因為 Namecheap 的促銷(每個帳號可免費選一個 .online 或 .site,只需付 ICANN(網際網路名稱與號碼指派機構)費用約 0.20 美元)而破例,替一個小專案買了 .online 頂級網域(TLD, Top-Level Domain)。他把網域接到 Cloudflare 與 GitHub,架了一個只有 App Store 連結、截圖與簡短文字的落地頁。幾週後他查看流量才發現 48 小時內完全沒人造訪,開站時先看到整頁紅底的「不安全網站」警告(Google Safe Browsing,Google 的惡意網站黑名單服務),硬是略過警告後又變成「site not found」,看起來像是網域突然消失。

他先從註冊商 Namecheap 檢查,帳號內顯示網域仍在、到期日正常、名稱伺服器也指向 Cloudflare;但用 dig(DNS 查詢工具)查 dig NS getwisp.online +short 卻得到空結果,再查 WHOIS(網域註冊查詢)看到狀態是 serverHold。作者也釐清 serverHold 是由註冊局(registry)設定、比註冊商可控制的 clientHold 更難處理;更糟的是,他完全沒收到任何來自註冊局、註冊商、代管方或 Google 的通知。Namecheap 回覆指出停用並非他們所為,而是該 TLD 的註冊局直接把網域「上鎖」,常見原因是涉及濫用;作者轉向 .online 的註冊局 Radix 求助,得到的說法是:網域因被列入 Google Safe Browsing 黑名單而遭停用,必須先依指示完成下架(delist)才能解鎖。

問題隨即變成典型的驗證死循環:要向 Google 申訴並請求重新審查,必須先在 Google Search Console(Google 搜尋控制台)驗證網域所有權,而驗證方式通常要新增 DNS TXT 或 CNAME 紀錄;但 serverHold 會讓網域在註冊局層級不再解析,導致 Google 看不到驗證紀錄、也爬不到頁面內容,甚至出現「No valid pages were submitted」。註冊局堅持要等 Google 解除標記才會恢復解析,Google 又要求先驗證所有權才受理正式審查,作者只能四處填寫誤判回報表單,並向註冊局申請「暫時解除」讓 Google 得以檢視內容。最後他把教訓歸納為:避免「奇怪的」新 TLD、網域一買就先在 Search Console 預先完成驗證,以及即使只是落地頁也要有基本可用性監控;同時批評 Radix 與 Google 的「零通知、零緩衝」封鎖與解封流程,讓無辜者幾乎無從自救。

留言區的共鳴點是「就算你不是 Google 客戶,也會被 Google 的黑箱治理波及」:不少人把這類無預警封鎖視為平台權力外溢與服務劣化(enshittification),尤其當註冊局或註冊商把 Google Safe Browsing 當成自動停用觸發器時,等同讓整個 TLD 對嚴肅用途變得不可用。也有人提出折衷想法:快速停用或許能降低惡意網站危害,但必須配套更合理的解封機制,例如提供短暫寬限期、至少允許網域持有人繼續設定 TXT 以完成所有權驗證,否則只會製造更多冤案。討論也延伸到新 TLD 的其他風險:安全廠商把某些 TLD 當「惡意 TLD」直接封鎖、續約費用突增(例如 .icu 從 20 美元跳到 220、美國有人 .dev 逾期不到一天續約變 800、美金與 .online 續約變貴等),以及註冊商品質下滑(有人提到 Namecheap、Gandi 被私募基金影響),並交換替代選擇如 Porkbun、Bookmyname(Scaleway)、Infomaniak 等;也有人提醒「永遠只買 .com」未必現實,改用 ccTLD(國碼頂級網域)有時規範更明確、申訴管道也可能更可依循。

👥 38 則討論、評論 💬
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47151233
0
0
0

병무청, 내달 3일부터 예비군 동원훈련
(서울=연합뉴스) 이정현 기자 = 병무청은 다음 달 3일 예비군 대상 2026년도 병력동원훈련을 시작한다고 26일 밝혔다.
yna.co.kr/view/AKR202602260834

0

병무청, 내달 3일부터 예비군 동원훈련
(서울=연합뉴스) 이정현 기자 = 병무청은 다음 달 3일 예비군 대상 2026년도 병력동원훈련을 시작한다고 26일 밝혔다.
yna.co.kr/view/AKR202602260834

0

The Adorant figurine

Are these marks the precursor to writing?
A series of notches carved on a piece of mammoth ivory roughly 40,000 years ago could be an early ancestor of cuneiform, one of the oldest-known forms of written language. “These sign sequences go beyond decoration that was aesthetically pleasing to particular individuals,” says linguist Christian Bentz.

Reference: PNAS paper




The Adorant figurine from Geißenklösterle Cave, in what is now Germany, is approximately 38,000 years old and bears a lion-human figure on one side and multiple sequences of notches and dots on the other. (Landesmuseum Württemberg/Hendrik Zwietasch, CC BY 4.0)

He co-authored a new study of the object and more than 200 other Stone Age artifacts that bear these signs. The study found statistical patterns in the Stone-Age marks that are similar to early proto-cuneform — but quite different to the information-dense writing systems of today.
0
0

How many people know that was co-founded by a black man, Mike Little?

Or that he's from the north of England? A self-taught coder from , just south of ? Or that he never received so much as a share, cent or job offer from the $7bn+ valued Automattic after spending five months working exclusively with Matt Mullenweg on the B2 fork?

After @bevangelistJohn Bevan 🤔 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ✊ told me about @mikelittle I interviewed him for a documentary I never got round to making. Back then I was left with two certainties: he's Wozniak to Mullenweg's Jobs. Among other things he added the one-click upgrade that's been central to WP's bonkers 45%-of-the-web-success. And he's one of the nicest people I've ever interviewed, which is also bonkers given that he not only didn't share in WP's financial success, but that he's barely known.

But he should be - so, better late than never - please meet , perhaps the most-influential-least-known person in 25.netribution.co.uk/nic/mike-

0
13
0
0

"Any trade deal with Canada will include tariffs, says Trump's trade rep"

""When we go to other countries, and we make a deal with them ... they agree that we can have a tariff on them," Greer told CBC News correspondent Katie Simpson."

Well, Jamieson, your Supreme Court says they are illegal. And you're missing the point of a free trade deal and how arrogant and ignorant of you.

cbc.ca/news/politics/trump-tar

0
0