What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
2
0
0
1
1
0

원민경 “모든 여성에 생리대 지원합니다”… 연령·소득 무관 모든 여성에 생리대 지원 www.womennews.co.kr/news/article... "또 원 장관은 “중앙정부는 안전성 품질 기준을 통과한 품목을 선정해 단가 계약을 체결하고 지방정부는 생리대를 구매해 공공시설에 비치해 주민들이 원활하게 사용할 수 있도록 하겠다”며 “올해는 국비로 시범사업을 실시하고 지역 유형별 접근성과 이용률 등 시범사업 결과를 분석해 내년도 본 사업을 준비하도록 하겠다”고 말했다."

원민경 “모든 여성에 생리대 지원합니다”… 연령·소득 ...

0
0

원민경 “모든 여성에 생리대 지원합니다”… 연령·소득 무관 모든 여성에 생리대 지원 www.womennews.co.kr/news/article... "또 원 장관은 “중앙정부는 안전성 품질 기준을 통과한 품목을 선정해 단가 계약을 체결하고 지방정부는 생리대를 구매해 공공시설에 비치해 주민들이 원활하게 사용할 수 있도록 하겠다”며 “올해는 국비로 시범사업을 실시하고 지역 유형별 접근성과 이용률 등 시범사업 결과를 분석해 내년도 본 사업을 준비하도록 하겠다”고 말했다."

원민경 “모든 여성에 생리대 지원합니다”… 연령·소득 ...

0
0

[성명] 23년의 피눈물로 열어젖힌 시대...이제, 진짜 사장 나와라 nodong.org/statement/79... 이 법전의 한 자 한 자는 스스로 몸을 불살랐던 배달호 열사의 절규이며, 가정이 파괴되는 고통 속에서도 굴하지 않았던 투쟁의 기록이며, 노란 봉투에 4만 7천 원의 마음을 담아 보내준 수만 명 시민의 연대가 빚어낸 결정체다. 민주노총은 원청 사용자에게 교섭에 나설 것을 준엄히 요구하며, 정부와 노동위원회에는 법 취지에 맞는 엄정한 집행을 촉구한다.

[성명] 23년의 피눈물로 열어젖힌 시대...이제, 진...

0
0
0
1
0
0
사악한 신의 도시락 가게
이런 탄탄한 기초에서 나오는 간결하고 단호한 그림이 너무 좋아... 작가 잡아먹고 그천되고싶네
그리고 닭이 대충생겨서 귀여움 • v • (ㄹㅇ닭임)

묵직한 이야기를 툭툭 던지는게 좋아
인간타락 악신의 힘 되찾기 프로젝트
ㄴ그냥 납작발언이고 직접 봐야 뭔느알 됨
인간이 되엇으면서 신격이 튀어나오는 그 분위기가 너무 좋아
1
0
0
0
0

우리가 두번의 탄핵국면을 거쳤잖아요? 그런데 그 두번의 국면에서 평화적 집회는 온도차가 좀 있었다고 생각합니다. 박근혜 때는 계엄 문건만 나오고 실제 계엄이 일어나지 않은 상황이기도 했고 당시 새누리당 안의 분열이 상당히 빨라서 일종의 긍정적 미래에 대한 기대감과 그 결과에 따른 효능감이 상당했다고 봐요. 표현이 적절할지 모르겠지만 평화집회가 반드시 옳은 방법이다. 라는 자부심도 있었던것 같고요. 실제 시위가 과열되면 민주노총이나 시민단체는 빠져라 라든가 폭력 유도하지 마라 같은 이야기가 내부에서 제법 나오기도 했고요.

0
0
0

Standards work is about coming together and working on reaching a shared consensus on a thing. We don't do corporate politics, or government politics, at standards meetings nor venues.

Sure, you can disagree on things outside of the standards world, but within, the only thing that matters is advancing the standards and building them right.

Like, when running the ActivityPub Trust and Safety taskforce, we had Meta employees show up to our meetings, and they were genuinely helpful (volunteering for instance to scribe the meeting, which is like one of the hardest jobs to fill at a standards meeting), and when they joined I had to repeat that golden rule of standards: we leave corporate politics and our company's at the door.

We did have one or two people mad that they were present, but luckily I didn't have to explicitly remind anyone of the W3C code of conduct which governs those meetings.

Standards work is truly a bit weird like that. It takes a lot of discipline to separate out those things severance style: an innie and an outie with regards to the standards work.

Finally, we live under capitalism, or at least the vast majority of us do (it's always interesting when someone from the CCP shows up at a standards meeting!), and living under capitalism means everything revolves around money.

W3C membership ain't cheap: membership dues start at like €2,000 and go up to like €60,000 or something.

As an Invited Expert, I'm allowed to participate without paying the W3C. However, I still need to be paid for my time, because time equals money under capitalism for 99% of us.

Bluesky stepping up to fund this work is a genuinely good thing, regardless of what you may think of bluesky as a company or social app.

There weren't really any other companies with an interest in decentralized social that could fund work at this scale. An NLNet grant probably wouldn't be workable for this, and operates at a much slower pace.

Anyway, hopefully that gives you a better idea of how standards are built and funded.

0
0
1

So there's a tiny tiny percentage of people in my mentions right now that are accusing me of horrible things because they don't like Bluesky and I've taken money from them.

For these people, I'm not saying you have to like Bluesky's moderation practices or the decision they make for their own app, I would never say such.

These people fundamentally do not get standards, and especially web standards, and how they are made. So here's a small explanation for people.

In the standards community, there's practically a code that is we do not argue about our employers or financial supporters' corporate positions, we leave our companies at the door when we participate in writing open standards.

Sure, some of us my represent our given employers within the standards community (and there's a requirement to disclose affiliations), but there's also a bunch of us that operate entirely independently of any given company.

At the W3C, which is the home of the FedCM standard, they have what are known as Invited Experts, and the W3C enforces that they act independently and that they disclose any affiliation, especially financial.

I am an Invited Expert, that happened before Bluesky decided to fund my work. Bluesky, like them or not, are one of the few organizations that actually has the capital to fund standards work. Doing this work isn't cheap either! It's a tonne of work seeking consensus and reaching agreement to move things forwards.

Like, I'm current budgeting 30-50% of my productive time over the next year will be working on this standard.

When I first chatted with Bluesky, they were initially like "we want to do a three month freelance contract to implement FedCM for AT Protocol", and after some conversation, we settled on "no, this shouldn't be a contract but instead a grant, that allows you to be completely independent of bluesky and explicitly enables you to work across decentralized protocols, making FedCM better for everyone"

The grant is explicitly clear contractually that I am entirely independent from bluesky, like I could make a technical decision others at bluesky do not like (unlikely, but possible), and it would not affect the grant.

It explicitly requires me to work across protocols.

Standards work is about coming together and working on reaching a shared consensus on a thing. We don't do corporate politics, or government politics, at standards meetings nor venues.

Sure, you can disagree on things outside of the standards world, but within, the only thing that matters is advancing the standards and building them right.

Like, when running the ActivityPub Trust and Safety taskforce, we had Meta employees show up to our meetings, and they were genuinely helpful (volunteering for instance to scribe the meeting, which is like one of the hardest jobs to fill at a standards meeting), and when they joined I had to repeat that golden rule of standards: we leave corporate politics and our company's at the door.

We did have one or two people mad that they were present, but luckily I didn't have to explicitly remind anyone of the W3C code of conduct which governs those meetings.

Standards work is truly a bit weird like that. It takes a lot of discipline to separate out those things severance style: an innie and an outie with regards to the standards work.

Finally, we live under capitalism, or at least the vast majority of us do (it's always interesting when someone from the CCP shows up at a standards meeting!), and living under capitalism means everything revolves around money.

W3C membership ain't cheap: membership dues start at like €2,000 and go up to like €60,000 or something.

As an Invited Expert, I'm allowed to participate without paying the W3C. However, I still need to be paid for my time, because time equals money under capitalism for 99% of us.

Bluesky stepping up to fund this work is a genuinely good thing, regardless of what you may think of bluesky as a company or social app.

There weren't really any other companies with an interest in decentralized social that could fund work at this scale. An NLNet grant probably wouldn't be workable for this, and operates at a much slower pace.

Anyway, hopefully that gives you a better idea of how standards are built and funded.

0
0
0

So there's a tiny tiny percentage of people in my mentions right now that are accusing me of horrible things because they don't like Bluesky and I've taken money from them.

For these people, I'm not saying you have to like Bluesky's moderation practices or the decision they make for their own app, I would never say such.

These people fundamentally do not get standards, and especially web standards, and how they are made. So here's a small explanation for people.

In the standards community, there's practically a code that is we do not argue about our employers or financial supporters' corporate positions, we leave our companies at the door when we participate in writing open standards.

Sure, some of us my represent our given employers within the standards community (and there's a requirement to disclose affiliations), but there's also a bunch of us that operate entirely independently of any given company.

At the W3C, which is the home of the FedCM standard, they have what are known as Invited Experts, and the W3C enforces that they act independently and that they disclose any affiliation, especially financial.

I am an Invited Expert, that happened before Bluesky decided to fund my work. Bluesky, like them or not, are one of the few organizations that actually has the capital to fund standards work. Doing this work isn't cheap either! It's a tonne of work seeking consensus and reaching agreement to move things forwards.

Like, I'm current budgeting 30-50% of my productive time over the next year will be working on this standard.

When I first chatted with Bluesky, they were initially like "we want to do a three month freelance contract to implement FedCM for AT Protocol", and after some conversation, we settled on "no, this shouldn't be a contract but instead a grant, that allows you to be completely independent of bluesky and explicitly enables you to work across decentralized protocols, making FedCM better for everyone"

The grant is explicitly clear contractually that I am entirely independent from bluesky, like I could make a technical decision others at bluesky do not like (unlikely, but possible), and it would not affect the grant.

It explicitly requires me to work across protocols.

0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

🍝 저의 주님, 날아다니는 스파게티 괴물 님, 저를 보호하시어 살펴주소서.
😋 어서 구원하시어 혼자 내버려 두지 마소서.

🍝 날아다니는 스파게티 괴물 님께서 여러분과 함께.
😋 또한 주교의 면발과 함께 하소서.
🍝 기도합시다.
지극히 선하신 스파게티 괴물 님, 사람들이 더욱더 완전한 것을 이루기 위해서 서로 협조하여 일하게 해주셨으니,
저희 기도를 들으시고 저희가 항상 우정을 품고, 모든 이들을 위한 박애로 끊임없이 일하게 하소서.

"20. 오후의 나른함 속에서도 성면의 순환이 저희 안에 활기를 불어넣어, 기쁨으로 섬기게 하소서."

🍝 날아다니는 스파게티 괴물 님께서 여러분과 함께.
😋 또한 주교의 면발과 함께 하소서.
🍝 전능하신 스파게티 괴물 님, 미트볼🧆과 소스🥫와 성면(the Holy Noodle)🍝께서는 여기 모인 모든 이에게 강복하소서.
😋 라-멘 🍜.

🍝 날아다니는 스파게티 괴물 님을 찬미합시다.
😋 주님 감사합니다.

2026-03-10T14:03:26+09:00


0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
27
0
0
0
0
0
0