Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.
‘사법 3법’(법왜곡죄·재판소원·대법관 증원)이 오는 11일 자정에 공포됩니다. 법왜곡죄와 재판소원은 공포와 동시에 시행되고, 대법관 증원은 2028년 3월부터 3년에 걸쳐 매년 4명씩 늘어납니다.
재판소원·법왜곡죄 11일 시행…자정부터 확정판결 ‘불복...
Writing my own text editor, and daily-driving it
Link: https://blog.jsbarretto.com/post/text-editor
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47331034
BYDは勢いあるよね
世界最大のEVメーカーBYDがF1またはWEC参戦を検討との報道。中国での関心の高まりを受け | ニュース | autosport web
https://www.as-web.jp/f1/1297235
おっ
E-Voting in Basel: 2048 elektronisch abgegebene Stimmen können nicht ausgezählt werden https://www.bs.ch/medienmitteilungen/2026-e-voting-basel-stadt-gibt-analyse-zu-den-umstaenden-und-ursachen-des-vorfalls-bei-der-abstimmung-vom-8-maerz-2026-auftrag
美鈴ぬいが
風邪を引いたＰのためにリンゴを切ってくれたよ
カワイイね！
From what I've observed, people who claim that LLMs can replace artists don't understand art, people who claim that they can replace musicians don't understand music, people who claim that they can replace writers don't understand literature, and people who claim they can replace translators don't rely on translations. If I had a button that would erase LLMs from the world but it would take machine translations away (which is a false dichotomy anyway), I would absolutely still press it.
Technology is not inevitable. We've decided not to have asbestos in our walls, lead in our pipes, or carginogenic chemicals in our food. (If you're going to argue that it's not everywhere, where would you rather live?) We could just not do LLMs. It's allowed.
I have the impression that primarily anglophone people don't read as much translated literature, because so much good literature already exists in their language, so this issue may not be as familiar within that demographic. As someone who did not grow up anglophone, I can tell you there is a world of difference between a good and a bad translation even when done by humans. Machine translations are not even on the scale.
From what I've observed, people who claim that LLMs can replace artists don't understand art, people who claim that they can replace musicians don't understand music, people who claim that they can replace writers don't understand literature, and people who claim they can replace translators don't rely on translations. If I had a button that would erase LLMs from the world but it would take machine translations away (which is a false dichotomy anyway), I would absolutely still press it.
오늘자 폐급 진상 된 썰: 본가 주소랑 자취방 주소 섞어씀 수많은 X자에서 택배사 분들의 고뇌가 느껴짐
Machine translations are often brought up as a gotcha whenever I criticize LLMs. It's worth pointing out two things: Machine translations existed decades before LLMs, and yes, machine translations are useful. However: I would never in my life read a machine translated book. Understanding what a social media post is talking about in rough terms? Sure. Literature? Absolutely not. Hell, have you ever seen machine translated subtitles? It's absolute garbage.
I have the impression that primarily anglophone people don't read as much translated literature, because so much good literature already exists in their language, so this issue may not be as familiar within that demographic. As someone who did not grow up anglophone, I can tell you there is a world of difference between a good and a bad translation even when done by humans. Machine translations are not even on the scale.
Machine translations are often brought up as a gotcha whenever I criticize LLMs. It's worth pointing out two things: Machine translations existed decades before LLMs, and yes, machine translations are useful. However: I would never in my life read a machine translated book. Understanding what a social media post is talking about in rough terms? Sure. Literature? Absolutely not. Hell, have you ever seen machine translated subtitles? It's absolute garbage.
美鈴ぬいが
風邪を引いたＰのためにリンゴを切ってくれたよ
カワイイね！
今日はメッチャ早く帰れたのでゆっくりできる😆
今日、近所のエネオス行ったんです。エネオス。
そしたらなんか人がめちゃくちゃいっぱいで座れないんです。
で、よく見たらなんか垂れ幕下がってて、ガソリン値上がり、とか書いてあるんです。
もうね、アホかと。馬鹿かと。
お前らな、20円値上がりで普段来てないエネオスに来てんじゃねーよ、ボケが。
20円だよ、20円。
なんか親子連れとかもいるし。一家４人で吉野家か。おめでてーな。
よーしパパハイオク頼んじゃうぞー、とか言ってるの。もう見てらんない。
お前らな、20円やるからその席空けろと。
エネオスってのはな、もっと殺伐としてるべきなんだよ。
向かいの給油機で給油してるやつといつ喧嘩が始まってもおかしくない、
刺すか刺されるか、そんな雰囲気がいいんじゃねーか。女子供は、すっこんでろ。
Office.eu launches as 100% European-owned alternative to Microsoft 365/Google Workspace, built on Nextcloud/Collabora with EU-only data centers. 🧩
Aims for digital sovereignty amid Big Tech data scandals and US CLOUD Act risks, offering docs, email, calendars, and video on open-source stack. 🛡️
🔗 https://www.siliconrepublic.com/enterprise/office-eu-and-the-want-for-a-digitally-sovereign-europe
#TechNews #OpenSource #Privacy #Security #Government #Europe #EU #IT #Microsoft #Office #Tech #Cloud #FOSS #Linux #OfficeEU #DigitalSovereignty #Nextcloud #US #Google #BigTech
RE: https://mastodon.social/@arstechnica/116205075329513597
AI-contributed code needs more review than human-generated, not less. How was this not always the case ⁉️
今日、近所のエネオス行ったんです。エネオス。
そしたらなんか人がめちゃくちゃいっぱいで座れないんです。
で、よく見たらなんか垂れ幕下がってて、ガソリン値上がり、とか書いてあるんです。
もうね、アホかと。馬鹿かと。
お前らな、20円値上がりで普段来てないエネオスに来てんじゃねーよ、ボケが。
20円だよ、20円。
なんか親子連れとかもいるし。一家４人で吉野家か。おめでてーな。
よーしパパハイオク頼んじゃうぞー、とか言ってるの。もう見てらんない。
お前らな、20円やるからその席空けろと。
エネオスってのはな、もっと殺伐としてるべきなんだよ。
向かいの給油機で給油してるやつといつ喧嘩が始まってもおかしくない、
刺すか刺されるか、そんな雰囲気がいいんじゃねーか。女子供は、すっこんでろ。
요즘들어 웹페이지 광고중에서 가장 불쾌한 경험을 제공하는건 압도적으로 구글 애드센스인듯. 포르노를 대놓고 노출하지 않나 화면 절반을 드롭다운으로 가리지 않나 진짜 사람 열받게 만듦.
"헌재가 재판을 취소한 이후 법원에서 다시 재판을 했음에도 취소 취지가 그대로 구현되지 못해 다시 재판소원을 제기하는 경우라도 남소로 볼 수는 없다"
<사실상 4심 넘어 8심도 가능?> 같은 기괴한 서브타이틀이 붙어 있는데요. 재판소원으로 재판이 취소된다면 취소의 이유가 있을 것이고, 결국 원래의 재판에 흠결이 있었다는 것인데요. 그러면 흠결 있는 재판을 하거나 답습하지 않으면 되지 않습니까...
꼭 무슨 "범죄를 저지르고 감옥에 다녀왔음에도 다시 범죄를 저지르면 또 감옥에 가야 하는가?" 같은 말처럼 들리잖아요.
헌재 "대법원 확정 판결 사건도 1심에서 문제 발견되면...
just having a snack
나때는 학폭에 대한 법적 정의도 미비해서, 아주 유명한 격언이 있었음.
"학폭은 ㅎㅈ으로 갚는다"
요즘엔 법이 생겨서, 가해자들은 죄 값을 법대로 갚는걸 정말 감사히 여겨야 됨.
Logging on... :3
ややめさん（
@yayame_artyayame（ややめ） 
"La amistad duplica las alegrías y divide las angustias por la mitad." ~ Francis Bacon (parafraseando a Cicerón).
https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/
The norms that open source communities built over decades did not wait for court approval. People chose the GPL when the law offered them no guarantee of its enforcement, because it expressed the values of the communities they wanted to belong to. Those values do not expire when the law changes.
https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/
The norms that open source communities built over decades did not wait for court approval. People chose the GPL when the law offered them no guarantee of its enforcement, because it expressed the values of the communities they wanted to belong to. Those values do not expire when the law changes.
まあいうて給油1回につき600円ぐらい上がるだけでしょ（はなほじ）
💪
今日は飯食べ行ってついでにｶﾞｲｺﾞ行ってガソリン入れてハンダをつけます
170여명이 희생된 이란 남부 초등학교 공습에 사용된 것으로 보이는 미사일의 잔해에서 ‘메이드 인 USA’ 표기와 미국 방산업체 이름이 확인됐습니다. 미국 책임론에 점점 더 무게가 실립니다.
이란 초등학교 떨어진 미사일 파편에 ‘메이드 인 USA...
당장 법적 구속력이 없으나 2019년에 만들어진 유럽 단일 시장 정책 관련 리뉴얼에 올해 반영될 예정이어서 로비전이 치열할 듯.
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:a6qvfkbrohedqy3dt6k5mdv6/post/3mgqonrdlr223
Well this changes the tone
유럽 의회, 생성AI의 저작권 침해에 대해 "완전한 투명성"과 "공정 보상"을 요구, 460:71로 권고 채택
xenospectrum.com/eu-parliamen...
1. EU 서비스 AI는 학습이 EU 밖이더라도 EU 저작권법 적용 대상
2. AI학습에 사용한 모든 저작권 보호 작품/제품의 리스트 제공해야
4. 뉴스미디어는 AI학습을 거부할 권리가 인정
+ AI혼자 만든 컨텐츠는 저작권 인정 안함
欧州議会、生成AIによる著作権侵害に「完全な透明性」と「公正...
MBC의 윤석열 전 대통령 ‘바이든-날리면’ 발언 보도에 대해 방송통신심의위원회가 내린 과징금 3천만원 처분을 취소하라는 법원 판결이 나왔습니다.
법원, 윤석열 ‘바이든 날리면’ MBC 보도 과징금 취...
あしたのぼくへ がんばれ ぼくより
hot take, the current generative AI hype and wave of generative AI tech is irredeemable colonialist garbage and if you support it you are an enemy of the commons
Join us for our latest London meet-up!
The ORG team will be there to update you on our campaigns on the Migrant Digital Rights Programme and our calls to reform the ICO.
🗓️ Wednesday 25 March
🕡️ 6:30–10pm GMT
📍 Newspeak House, E2 7DG
Sign up now ⬇️
https://www.openrightsgroup.org/events/org-london-meet-up-3/
님들 다같이 블스로 와 라고 말하지만 플텍밖에서 살아갈 수 없는 너무 많은 사람이 탐라에 있어...
I'm writing this in English.
Not because English is my first language—it isn't. I'm writing this in English because if I wrote it in Korean, the people I'm addressing would run it through an outdated translator, misread it, and respond to something I never said. The responsibility for that mistranslation would fall on me. It always does.
This is the thing Eugen Rochko's post misses, despite its good intentions.
@GargronEugen Rochko argues that LLMs are no substitute for human translators, and that people who think otherwise don't actually rely on translation. He's right about some of this. A machine-translated novel is not the same as one rendered by a skilled human translator. But the argument rests on a premise that only makes sense from a certain position: that translation is primarily about quality, about the aesthetic experience of reading literature in another language.
For many of us, translation is first about access.
The professional translation market doesn't scale to cover everything. It never has. What gets translated—and into which languages—follows the logic of cultural hegemony. Works from dominant Western languages flow outward, translated into everything. Works from East Asian languages trickle in, selectively, slowly, on someone else's schedule. The asymmetry isn't incidental; it's structural.
@GargronEugen Rochko notes, fairly, that machine translation existed decades before LLMs. But this is only half the story, and which half matters depends entirely on which languages you're talking about. European language pairs were reasonably serviceable with older tools. Korean–English, Japanese–English, Chinese–English? Genuinely usable translation for these pairs arrived with the LLM era. Treating “machine translation” as a monolithic technology with a uniform history erases the experience of everyone whose language sits far from the Indo-European center.
There's also something uncomfortable in the framing of the button-press thought experiment: “I would erase LLMs even if it took machine translation with it.” For someone whose language has always been peripheral, that button looks very different. It's not an abstract philosophical position; it's a statement about whose access to information is expendable.
I want to be clear: none of this is an argument that LLMs are good, or that the harms @GargronEugen Rochko describes aren't real. They are. But a critique of AI doesn't become more universal by ignoring whose languages have always been on the margins. If anything, a serious critique of AI's political economy should be more attentive to those asymmetries, not less.
The fact that I'm writing this in English, carefully, so it won't be misread—that's not incidental to my argument. That is my argument.
Mendocino County (in California, United States) seems to be working the library over with their exorbitant administrative fees and poor bookkeeping over the last few years.
Mendocino County Library is facing a huge budget shortfall, to the tune of nearly $750,000! County residents, let the County know how much the library means to you and demand change about this billing.
Budget overview here: https://www.mendolibrary.org/home/showpublisheddocument/76497
현실은 집 근처에선 비슷한 지리적 위치에 사는 사람들을 많이 보게되고 그러다보면 소득수준이나 세대같은 측면의 단절이 일어나고 회사/학교에서 만나는 사람도 당연히 비슷한 문제가 있다. 그래서 계급에 기반한 단절이 훨씬 쉽게 일어나는 곳이 인터넷 바깥 세상이라고 생각해요
leyrer
（仮）
Chao-c'
NTSK
➰
MJ+
쯔방 
Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) 
김강훈 | 金江訓 Kim Kanghun
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) 
Quincy ⁂
trending_bot
phildini