Search results

#introduction

I am a (non-tenure track, uni) interested in every single thing about , esp ones, & Side gig in ( lol). I love and will ask you too many questions about your etc . Proud fan. Love ๐Ÿ‘‹

0
0
0

Developer, first , then , then (since a long time), recently .
I maintain , a scala library, since its creator passed away (RIP Oleg).

I have organized meetups in Berlin, for the and then for .

I really like but I struggle when I have to choose between performance & style.
I'm trying to be a good citizen in the open-source world, opening issues / PRs, helping others.

0
0

We're migrating Hackers' Pub to a pretty unconventional tech stack, and I'm honestly excited about it!

Thanks to my friend @xiniha, we're diving into , , , , and . In a world dominated by Next.js and React, this feels refreshingly different. And yes, we're sticking with instead of Node.js too.

Some might call it contrarian, but I like to think of it as exploring what's possible beyond the mainstream. Sometimes the road less traveled leads to interesting places.

7

I've been thinking about client-server interactions in the . isn't widely used, and most clients rely on Mastodon-compatible APIs instead.

What if we created a new standardized API based on GraphQL + Relay for client-server communication, while keeping ActivityPub for server-to-server federation?

The Mastodon-compatible API lacks formal schema definitions for code generation and type checking, which hurts developer productivity. And ActivityPub C2S is honestly too cumbersome to use directly from client apps.

would give us type safety, efficient data fetching (only get what you need), and the ability to evolve the API without breaking clients. 's features for pagination, caching, and optimistic updates seem perfect for social apps.

Would this be valuable to our community? What challenges do you see? How might we handle backward compatibility? And should this be formalized as an FEP?

Curious what others think about this approach.

3
8
0