What is Hackers' Pub?

미 전문가들이 본 이란 전쟁…“핵 확산, 한반도 안보, 세계 경제 연쇄 충격” 2026-03-10 14:47

미 전문가들이 본 이란 전쟁…“핵 확산, 한반도 안보,...

this piece by @hongminhee洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) is excellent. #copyleft

https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/

Megawatts and monoliths. A fun pair of guide books that just arrived in the mail. Next trip to Britain I hope I to visit another stone circle and my first nuclear reactor.

지난해 대통령 선거 직전, 수만 명으로 추정되는 한국교원단체총연합회(아래 교총) 관련 교원의 개인정보를 무단으로 빼돌려 당시 '국민의힘 김문수 대통령 후보 임명장'을 무더기로 발송한 혐의를 받는 교총 전 사무총장과 당시 국장급 인사가 재판에 넘겨진 것으로 확인됐다. 혐의는 개인정보보호법 위반이다.

지난해 대통령 선거 직전, 수만 명으로 추정되는 한국교...

“여성 정치세력화 소홀했던 점 반성···윤석열의 총리 제안엔 ‘내게 수치’라고 거절” [단도직입] 박영선 전 중소벤처기업부 장관 인터뷰 수정 2026-03-10 22:42

“여성 정치세력화 소홀했던 점 반성···윤석열의 총리 ...

外で急ぎの作業する時とかrefaceDX活躍してた、出先のヒトカラで仕事進める限界人間には最適(これは関西に仕事で行ってたとき)

狙ったわけじゃないんだけど、
関連記事みたいになっちゃった。

現在使っているgemのバージョンを正確に知る
https://zenn.dev/kitaitimakoto/articles/9bdc37b6de5acd

電話を新しくしたら第二要素のシークレットが移ってくれたことを確認しないとよね。めんどー

json gemが衝突してから学ぶmodule loadの歴史
https://zenn.dev/gatechnologies/articles/9fd4d52421e429

편의성과 보안은 반비례한다는 법칙

... 물론 예외의 경우도 있긴 한데 (인터넷 뱅킹의 수많은 보안 플러그인이라 주장하는것들을 보며)

지난해 대통령 선거 직전, 수만 명으로 추정되는 한국교원단체총연합회(아래 교총) 관련 교원의 개인정보를 무단으로 빼돌려 당시 '국민의힘 김문수 대통령 후보 임명장'을 무더기로 발송한 혐의를 받는 교총 전 사무총장과 당시 국장급 인사가 재판에 넘겨진 것으로 확인됐다. 혐의는 개인정보보호법 위반이다.

지난해 대통령 선거 직전, 수만 명으로 추정되는 한국교...

【Security Hub修復手順】[EFS.8] EFS ファイルシステムは保管中に暗号化する必要があります
https://dev.classmethod.jp/articles/securityhub-fsbp-remediation-efs-8/

#dev_classmethod

현직 검사가 검찰의 ‘쿠팡 퇴직금 미지급 수사외압’ 사건과 관련해 “중요 노동사건을 포함해 통상의 사건 처리에서 보기 어려운 장면이었다”며 당시 검찰 수사과정을 지적했다. 수정 2026-03-10 16:08

현직 검사가 검찰의 ‘쿠팡 퇴직금 미지급 수사외압’ 사...

SK이노베이션의 배터리 자회사 SK온이 운영하는 미국 법인 SK배터리아메리카가 현지시간 6일 조지아주 공장 근로자 950여 명을 정리해고했습니다. 등록 2026-03-07 16:16

SK이노베이션의 배터리 자회사 SK온이 운영하는 미국 ...

Running Ocarina of Time on the Apple Watch

https://hackaday.com/2026/03/10/running-ocarina-of-time-on-the-apple-watch/

민주당, 권칠승·양기대·한준호 등 5명 경쟁 구도 15·19일 합동토론회… 21~22일 예비경선 통해 ‘3인 경선’ 확정 예정 등록 2026-03-10 18:29

민주당, 권칠승·양기대·한준호 등 5명 경쟁 구도

박주민, 정원오에 "성동구 집값 폭등이 자랑스럽나? 李정부 기조와 배치" ... 수정 2026.03.10 15:54:31

박주민, 정원오에 "성동구 집값 폭등이 자랑스럽나? 李...

“차별금지법 막자” 28일 서울시청 집회 예고 등록 2026-03-10 11:56

“차별금지법 막자” 28일 서울시청 집회 예고

うびびびび
おごごごごごご
うびびびび

중동 쇼크에 여천NCC ‘불가항력’…석유화학·고무·섬유 연쇄 위기 2026-03-09 11:23

중동 쇼크에 여천NCC ‘불가항력’…석유화학·고무·섬유...

Mother of All Grease Fires (1994)

Link: https://milk.com/wall-o-shame/bucket.html
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47328029

二度目の​​​​

도널드 트럼프 미국 대통령은 9일(현지시간) 이란이 호르무즈 해협에서 유조선 통행을 막는 조치를 취할 경우 미군이 여태까지보다 20배 강하게 이란을 타격할 것이라고 경고했다. 수정 2026-03-10 13:38

도널드 트럼프 미국 대통령은 9일(현지시간) 이란이 호...

'친구보다 친구 같은 AI' 손에 쥔 초등생‥"커도 사람 못 사귈 수도" imnews.imbc.com/replay/2026/... 전문가들은 특히 아동의 경우 AI에 과의존하기 쉽고 사회성 발달에도 악영향을 줄 우려가 크다고 경고합니다. [트리스탄 해리스/전 구글 윤리 최고책임자] '무조건적 공감'을 하는 AI, '의인화된 형태'의 AI도 어린이, 청소년에게 금지돼야 한다고 주장했습니다.

'친구보다 친구 같은 AI' 손에 쥔 초등생‥"커도 사...

(정말 나쁜생각)

I'm writing this in English.

Not because English is my first language—it isn't. I'm writing this in English because if I wrote it in Korean, the people I'm addressing would run it through an outdated translator, misread it, and respond to something I never said. The responsibility for that mistranslation would fall on me. It always does.

This is the thing Eugen Rochko's post misses, despite its good intentions.

@GargronEugen Rochko argues that LLMs are no substitute for human translators, and that people who think otherwise don't actually rely on translation. He's right about some of this. A machine-translated novel is not the same as one rendered by a skilled human translator. But the argument rests on a premise that only makes sense from a certain position: that translation is primarily about quality, about the aesthetic experience of reading literature in another language.

For many of us, translation is first about access.

The professional translation market doesn't scale to cover everything. It never has. What gets translated—and into which languages—follows the logic of cultural hegemony. Works from dominant Western languages flow outward, translated into everything. Works from East Asian languages trickle in, selectively, slowly, on someone else's schedule. The asymmetry isn't incidental; it's structural.

@GargronEugen Rochko notes, fairly, that machine translation existed decades before LLMs. But this is only half the story, and which half matters depends entirely on which languages you're talking about. European language pairs were reasonably serviceable with older tools. Korean–English, Japanese–English, Chinese–English? Genuinely usable translation for these pairs arrived with the LLM era. Treating “machine translation” as a monolithic technology with a uniform history erases the experience of everyone whose language sits far from the Indo-European center.

There's also something uncomfortable in the framing of the button-press thought experiment: “I would erase LLMs even if it took machine translation with it.” For someone whose language has always been peripheral, that button looks very different. It's not an abstract philosophical position; it's a statement about whose access to information is expendable.

I want to be clear: none of this is an argument that LLMs are good, or that the harms @GargronEugen Rochko describes aren't real. They are. But a critique of AI doesn't become more universal by ignoring whose languages have always been on the margins. If anything, a serious critique of AI's political economy should be more attentive to those asymmetries, not less.

The fact that I'm writing this in English, carefully, so it won't be misread—that's not incidental to my argument. That is my argument.

There are a lot of ways you can maintain your love for #FreeSoftware all year long: https://u.fsf.org/4ad #ILoveFS

트럼프 대통령의 손녀 카이 트럼프(18)가 미국 초고가 마트에서 비밀경호국(SS)의 경호를 받으며 쇼핑을 즐기는 영상을 올려 논란입니다. 미국·이스라엘-이란 전쟁 격화로 무고한 어린이를 포함한 인명 피해가 늘어나는 가운데 경솔하다는 비판이 나옵니다.

“비밀 경호원이랑 왔어” 전쟁 잊은 트럼프 손녀, 초고...

나쁜생각

냠

戻ってきた
https://www.youtube.com/live/sdeG4fsEviE?si=TU9aY08LFSwvYNv1

せり上がってきた貯水管、大阪だし「なんでやねん(ﾋﾞｼｯ)」ってやったら戻っていくのでは

‘옹골집합‘ @cosele코엘 (계속) https://yuri.garden/notes/ajp4styic2

침대 밖은 위험해!···10명 중 6명은 “수면 외 목적으로도 활용” www.khan.co.kr/article/2026... "침대 위 활동은 스마트 기기와도 밀접하게 연결돼 있었다. 침대에서 스마트폰을 사용한다는 응답이 78.4%(복수 응답)로 가장 많았고, 영상 시청(66.6%)이 뒤를 이었다. 이어 휴식(34.4%), 독서(21.8%), 대화·통화(14.5%) 순으로 나타났다."

침대 밖은 위험해!···10명 중 6명은 “수면 외 목...

I'm writing this in English.

Not because English is my first language—it isn't. I'm writing this in English because if I wrote it in Korean, the people I'm addressing would run it through an outdated translator, misread it, and respond to something I never said. The responsibility for that mistranslation would fall on me. It always does.

This is the thing Eugen Rochko's post misses, despite its good intentions.

@GargronEugen Rochko argues that LLMs are no substitute for human translators, and that people who think otherwise don't actually rely on translation. He's right about some of this. A machine-translated novel is not the same as one rendered by a skilled human translator. But the argument rests on a premise that only makes sense from a certain position: that translation is primarily about quality, about the aesthetic experience of reading literature in another language.

For many of us, translation is first about access.

The professional translation market doesn't scale to cover everything. It never has. What gets translated—and into which languages—follows the logic of cultural hegemony. Works from dominant Western languages flow outward, translated into everything. Works from East Asian languages trickle in, selectively, slowly, on someone else's schedule. The asymmetry isn't incidental; it's structural.

@GargronEugen Rochko notes, fairly, that machine translation existed decades before LLMs. But this is only half the story, and which half matters depends entirely on which languages you're talking about. European language pairs were reasonably serviceable with older tools. Korean–English, Japanese–English, Chinese–English? Genuinely usable translation for these pairs arrived with the LLM era. Treating “machine translation” as a monolithic technology with a uniform history erases the experience of everyone whose language sits far from the Indo-European center.

There's also something uncomfortable in the framing of the button-press thought experiment: “I would erase LLMs even if it took machine translation with it.” For someone whose language has always been peripheral, that button looks very different. It's not an abstract philosophical position; it's a statement about whose access to information is expendable.

I want to be clear: none of this is an argument that LLMs are good, or that the harms @GargronEugen Rochko describes aren't real. They are. But a critique of AI doesn't become more universal by ignoring whose languages have always been on the margins. If anything, a serious critique of AI's political economy should be more attentive to those asymmetries, not less.

The fact that I'm writing this in English, carefully, so it won't be misread—that's not incidental to my argument. That is my argument.

오세요 부산 횡령 목적의 오션뷰 베이커리 카페가 가득한 이곳

This isn’t just about Israel. It’s about the Middle East, the Palestinians, and a conflict that affects the world.
#MiddleEast #Palestine #books
https://thisgrandpablogs.com/the-accidental-empire-review-israeli-settlements-history/

攻防戦​​

영어수업.....

RE: https://mastodon.social/@appassionato/116208748710225480

Why the blue coloration?

South Water Caye, Belize

‘The speed and agility of this brown pelican was outwitting the small fish trying to escape.’

Photograph: Matthew Armon

#photography
#birds
#pelicans

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/olbCgH5uuDQ 챱츄낚싯추중심추말랑츄피카츄양배추아샷추하츄하츄핑추신수츄츄츄딩

This isn’t just about Israel. It’s about the Middle East, the Palestinians, and a conflict that affects the world.
#MiddleEast #Palestine #books
https://thisgrandpablogs.com/the-accidental-empire-review-israeli-settlements-history/

After outages, Amazon to make senior engineers sign off on AI-assisted changes

Link: https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/03/after-outages-amazon-to-make-senior-engineers-sign-off-on-ai-assisted-changes/
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47323017

I'm writing this in English.

Not because English is my first language—it isn't. I'm writing this in English because if I wrote it in Korean, the people I'm addressing would run it through an outdated translator, misread it, and respond to something I never said. The responsibility for that mistranslation would fall on me. It always does.

This is the thing Eugen Rochko's post misses, despite its good intentions.

@GargronEugen Rochko argues that LLMs are no substitute for human translators, and that people who think otherwise don't actually rely on translation. He's right about some of this. A machine-translated novel is not the same as one rendered by a skilled human translator. But the argument rests on a premise that only makes sense from a certain position: that translation is primarily about quality, about the aesthetic experience of reading literature in another language.

For many of us, translation is first about access.

The professional translation market doesn't scale to cover everything. It never has. What gets translated—and into which languages—follows the logic of cultural hegemony. Works from dominant Western languages flow outward, translated into everything. Works from East Asian languages trickle in, selectively, slowly, on someone else's schedule. The asymmetry isn't incidental; it's structural.

@GargronEugen Rochko notes, fairly, that machine translation existed decades before LLMs. But this is only half the story, and which half matters depends entirely on which languages you're talking about. European language pairs were reasonably serviceable with older tools. Korean–English, Japanese–English, Chinese–English? Genuinely usable translation for these pairs arrived with the LLM era. Treating “machine translation” as a monolithic technology with a uniform history erases the experience of everyone whose language sits far from the Indo-European center.

There's also something uncomfortable in the framing of the button-press thought experiment: “I would erase LLMs even if it took machine translation with it.” For someone whose language has always been peripheral, that button looks very different. It's not an abstract philosophical position; it's a statement about whose access to information is expendable.

I want to be clear: none of this is an argument that LLMs are good, or that the harms @GargronEugen Rochko describes aren't real. They are. But a critique of AI doesn't become more universal by ignoring whose languages have always been on the margins. If anything, a serious critique of AI's political economy should be more attentive to those asymmetries, not less.

The fact that I'm writing this in English, carefully, so it won't be misread—that's not incidental to my argument. That is my argument.

I'm writing this in English.

Not because English is my first language—it isn't. I'm writing this in English because if I wrote it in Korean, the people I'm addressing would run it through an outdated translator, misread it, and respond to something I never said. The responsibility for that mistranslation would fall on me. It always does.

This is the thing Eugen Rochko's post misses, despite its good intentions.

@GargronEugen Rochko argues that LLMs are no substitute for human translators, and that people who think otherwise don't actually rely on translation. He's right about some of this. A machine-translated novel is not the same as one rendered by a skilled human translator. But the argument rests on a premise that only makes sense from a certain position: that translation is primarily about quality, about the aesthetic experience of reading literature in another language.

For many of us, translation is first about access.

The professional translation market doesn't scale to cover everything. It never has. What gets translated—and into which languages—follows the logic of cultural hegemony. Works from dominant Western languages flow outward, translated into everything. Works from East Asian languages trickle in, selectively, slowly, on someone else's schedule. The asymmetry isn't incidental; it's structural.

@GargronEugen Rochko notes, fairly, that machine translation existed decades before LLMs. But this is only half the story, and which half matters depends entirely on which languages you're talking about. European language pairs were reasonably serviceable with older tools. Korean–English, Japanese–English, Chinese–English? Genuinely usable translation for these pairs arrived with the LLM era. Treating “machine translation” as a monolithic technology with a uniform history erases the experience of everyone whose language sits far from the Indo-European center.

There's also something uncomfortable in the framing of the button-press thought experiment: “I would erase LLMs even if it took machine translation with it.” For someone whose language has always been peripheral, that button looks very different. It's not an abstract philosophical position; it's a statement about whose access to information is expendable.

I want to be clear: none of this is an argument that LLMs are good, or that the harms @GargronEugen Rochko describes aren't real. They are. But a critique of AI doesn't become more universal by ignoring whose languages have always been on the margins. If anything, a serious critique of AI's political economy should be more attentive to those asymmetries, not less.

The fact that I'm writing this in English, carefully, so it won't be misread—that's not incidental to my argument. That is my argument.

FacebookやX、アクティブユーザー数を超える偽アカウントを毎年削除していることが明らかに【やじうまWatch】 - INTERNET Watch
https://internet.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/yajiuma/2092310.html

ひいっ