What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1

思いついただけ

写真くんのこと分かんないよ!
何を考えてるのか伝えてくれないし、いっつも私がご機嫌うかがって先回りしてもさ、なんか微妙な出来栄えにしかなってくれない!
付き合い始めてからいつもそうだったもううんざりなの!
いいから私を理解しようとして愛情表現してよ!私はこんなに愛してるんだよ?なんで……
他の人にもそうやっていい顔だけして困らせてるんでしょ?私以外にもたくさんキープがいるからそうやって曖昧な素振りばかりできるんでしょ?
なんで……なんでよ……私のこと好きって言ってよ…

1
2

this just can't go on further. using AI for mental health only makes things worse

"One in three adults in the are using for emotional support or social interaction. And one in 25 people turned to the tech for support or conversation every day [...] when the chatbots went down, people reported self-described "symptoms of withdrawal", such as feeling anxious or depressed" bbc.com/news/articles/cd6xl3ql

0

this just can't go on further. using AI for mental health only makes things worse

"One in three adults in the are using for emotional support or social interaction. And one in 25 people turned to the tech for support or conversation every day [...] when the chatbots went down, people reported self-described "symptoms of withdrawal", such as feeling anxious or depressed" bbc.com/news/articles/cd6xl3ql

0
2
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
3
0

this just can't go on further. using AI for mental health only makes things worse

"One in three adults in the are using for emotional support or social interaction. And one in 25 people turned to the tech for support or conversation every day [...] when the chatbots went down, people reported self-described "symptoms of withdrawal", such as feeling anxious or depressed" bbc.com/news/articles/cd6xl3ql

0

If you are an author whose work is on the ACM DL, I'd like to strongly encourage you to check the accuracy of the AI Summary of your paper, and send feedback to the ACM on this feature and the inaccuracies in your summary. See more here: dl.acm.org/generative-ai/summa

Please boost, repost, and otherwise steal this post to reach other authors.

In long:

The ACM has begun rolling out "Digital Library Premium" features. A very notable one is AI Summaries of papers, which displace the author written abstract with an AI generated summary of the paper on the front page for the paper.

Of the several I've checked, they all contain subtle inaccuracies that would VERY EASILY mislead even experts familiar with the work.

This is a HUGE DISSERVICE TO SCIENCE. These summaries might appear to make science more accessible, but subtle errors introduced into the authors original text is the very opposite of making science more accessible. This will mislead rather than educate.

The ACM has a feature to send feedback on these summaries. Open your DOI, and look for the "Feedback" button on the right of the page, or the "Send Feedback" link in the footer. (You might need to disable ad-blockers, as this services uses mopinion.com)

The ACM is requesting this feedback, and it's important to let them know that such "hallucinations" are not solvable:

These tools were designed in consultation with a diverse group of Digital Library stakeholders and will continue to evolve as Artificial Intelligence advances. We are continuously tuning our Foundational Model to optimize readability and we conduct regular audits for hallucinations and other errors. We are very interested in your thoughts and suggestions- please leave them by clicking the "Feedback" button on the far right of this page. If you find a problem with a specific AI-generated summary, please return to that summary and click the Feedback there.

More aggressively, you might email dl-team@hq.acm.org (also linked in the footer).

0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1