What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0

An FYI to users out there.

For a few days I've doing a massive cleanup on the issues, the docs and the codebase, and I've been aggressive closing tickets (with or without fixing them) and removing support for obsolete linters.

As you can imagine - that's a preparation step for the next release, so adventurous folks are invited to play with the latest snapshots from MELPA.

0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1

I just realized that is just the software-development equivalent of cooking at .

The output of is .

While , retain full control of the means of production, firmly anchored on their necks.
In the last forty years, this turned programming into an wealthy carrier that attracted greedy people because the only way corporation had to obliviate awareness of such unprecedented political leverage, was to pay developers relarively high salaries while they were building the infrastructure of their own oppression

With , means of production go back into capitals hands: novice produce nicely looking software without acquiring any valuable skill, and senior developers leverage their (hardly acquired) experience to "drive the tool like a younger intern", alienating¹ themselves, loosing their skills while providing further "training data"² to the capital owners

Note how I'm not strictly talking about employers: if you work for a company that push a from a third party (usually a from the ), your company is doomed too, as they are giving their most valuable asset (your skills and the business experience encoded in their source code) away.

Yet the point is that junk code is to society what junk food is to public health: a burden that mostly affect the poor, not the rich.

Indeed rich people can pay for fine restaurants and healthy food, while the poorest are forced to eat the cheapest slop they can afford, further enriching the companies that sell it and pay low wages to their employees.

In the same way, the users' of vibecoded software will be those who can't afford high quality software. And vibecoders will be those who can't afford to learn how to code (that requires time and energy, and thus money)

So while is marketed as "the democratization of programming", such hides the opposite process: if vibecoding keep spreading, programming will become a service to rent under the full control of a handful of companies that will be able to inject any vulnerability or backdoor into the junk code that nobody could actually read.

Paradoxically, those who now resist to the fear of missing out and preserve their skills might gain even higher wages in the future, while those who follow the mob will discover themselves among the replaceble members of the reserve army of labour, together with McDonald's chefs, forced to ~eat~ depend on junk code.

What about hackers

Hackers will keep programming on their own. Not much for the fun of encoding an insight into a sequence of symbols a compiler can crunch (a process that can be just as frustrating as it's rewarding in term of knowledge) but because they understands both the technicalities of these tools (no really understand its own output, so it can only work insofar the requirements replicated many existing software, but without any quality or security assurance) and the politics of the corporations that build and operate such tools.

In the long run, the social contract behind will evolve to avoid both contamination from junk code and contribution to the training dataset.

With everything else equal, we could have new stacks, designed to be both human friendly and hostile to corporations: simpler operating system, programming language and protocols.

Unless, obviously, these will somehow manage to outlaw programmable computing device they cannot control, probably in the name of users' security or children protection.

_____
¹ alienation is the process of reducing human (awareness of) . gaslight the issue framing it as an issue of personal empowerment that can be addressed at design level, but given how people are trained to treat other people as tools and to treat interactive software as people, you see the issue is systemic to usage (at least as long as they are programmed to pass the test and fool humans about their nature).

² talking about "training data" is alienating by itself, as it project a human experience over an unrelated mechanical process. Instead of "training data" we should talk about "source data", as the models are nothing more than executable expressed as numeric matrices and designed to be executed by specific custom-built architectures that are improperly called "inference engine" (or even worse, ) while they are just statistically programmable vector mapping machines.
0
0
0
1
0
0

중국지분 1만 들어가도 중국기업이다 라고 말하고 싶고, 중국에서 만들면 중국회사차다 라고 말하고 싶어서 죽고싶은 사람들 중에 유독 테슬라만 아무말 안하는 이유는 아마도 미국 버전의 단차 문제 때문이 아닐까 한다. 이런 사람들이 매번 중국에서 만드는 차에 문제 삼는 것 중 하나가 완성도나 마감 때문이었는데, 놀랍게도 미국산 테슬라는 그런 말도 나오지 못할 정도로 끔찍했기 때문이다. 물론 그와는 별개로 이제 중국 생산차의 완성도 안전성은 어디 내놓아도 꿀리지 않는 상태가 되었다.

0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1

운명의 이야기들

1. 우연은 계획보다 더 아름답다
2. 모든 만남에는 의미가 있다
3. 지금 여기, 이 순간이 최고의 선물
4. 불확실성을 두려워하지 마라
5. 작은 선택이 인생을 바꾼다
6. 마음의 문을 활짝 열어라
7. 직감을 믿어라

0
0
匿名質問箱サービスMewkを作りました​:blobcatphoto:

・MFMやカスタム絵文字をそのまま使って質問・回答できる
・回答はそのままMisskeyに投稿できる
・フレームスタイルやカラーを自由にカスタマイズ可能
・自動で不快な質問をブロック

Misskeyらしい見た目・書き方を崩さずに使えるのが特徴です
MiAuthに対応しているので、Misskeyアカウントでそのままログインできます。
よかったら使ってみてください〜

https://mewk.app/
1
匿名質問箱サービスMewkを作りました​:blobcatphoto:

・MFMやカスタム絵文字をそのまま使って質問・回答できる
・回答はそのままMisskeyに投稿できる
・フレームスタイルやカラーを自由にカスタマイズ可能
・自動で不快な質問をブロック

Misskeyらしい見た目・書き方を崩さずに使えるのが特徴です
MiAuthに対応しているので、Misskeyアカウントでそのままログインできます。
よかったら使ってみてください〜

https://mewk.app/
1
1
1
0
0