Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.
오늘 일정
* 구로에서 교육 듣기 (완료)
* 개발자 멘토링 받기 + 저녁식사 (오후 8시)
* -이잔, -스탄으로 끝나는 국가 공무원이 오는 행사 대비 자료 작성
* WelsonJS 버그 리포트를 위한 코드 개선
완료하면 오늘 일정은 끝난다.
Bury me in a corner comp
每個星期日都要提醒自己
不要責怪偷懶耍廢的自己
大きめの虫に部屋ん中入られた
속도위반
어디까지나 드립이지만 경상도 반응(메스가키)과 충청도 반응(계획?)이 재밌다
https://youtube.com/shorts/BePBjDcvvoY?si=Ak3pbu0dH-B36oTW
결혼하면, 부부관계 레벨 1인데, 부모가 되면 또 부모 레벨 1이거든요.
マレーシアが1,000艘の船をガザに出すって🔥🔥🔥
https://www.instagram.com/p/DK5S54xgD6R/?igsh=bmdjam42bnJqdnFk
Fukuoka airport landed safely
유부를 만들어요
잘되길기도해주시길 (지금 무서워서 멀찍이 떨어져있음)
サブドメインにサブドメインってできるんだろか
【3.5Mbpsの使用感は具体的にどんな感じか】-敷島レポート-
"At the heart of these alternative apps lies #theFediverse platform — a portmanteau of "federated" and "universe" that represents a radical reimagining of how social media can work. Unlike traditional platforms where users are locked into isolated ecosystems, the Fediverse operates as an interconnected network of independent servers that communicate with each other through a standard protocol called #ActivityPub."
ブログに書くことない…
(라고 해놓고 우락실감)
소설표지 15만원 글 쓴 사람인데요.
ai아니었고 실제로 수제 일러 표지를 저렇게 받고 있어서 놀라서 들고왔던건데 실제 시장 단가 자체는 저렇게 낮지 않다는 제보를 받았습니다.
그러니 15만원에 표지 해달라고 들고오는 것들 있으면 엄청난 후려치기니까 단호히 거부하십시오
괜한 공포감 조성이 될 것 같아 인용의 포스트는 지우겠습니다
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:3ujqspjwmbihh3ooeoane6bs/post/3lrn3gjives2q
I often want to write about functional programming and what it's really about, but I can never write something better than what 
@krisajenkinsKris Jenkins wrote in his "What is functional programming?".
(available in writing or in many conference talks on YouTube)
https://blog.jenkster.com/2015/12/what-is-functional-programming.html
Existential Lens란걸 알게되었는데 정의는 다음과 같다
dansup
wakest ⁂
data Lens s a = forall c. Lens (s -> (c, a)) ((c, a) -> s)돌무식 렌즈(get, set 레코드)보다는 좀더 어렵지만 Van Laarhoven Lens보다는 훨씬 더 직관적이라서 렌즈의 이해에 도움이 많이 되었다.
전체 설명은 요깄다.
だいたい寝てます。
子猫ってほんと、頭の比率が大きいよね。
[突發衝突!「館長你想當中國人?跟我換啊!」中國粉絲開嗆館長陳之漢: 想當台灣人的一堆在排隊! 小鄭在日本 - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOL-JaSEAso&t=675s)
其實講的滿好的啊。陳姥姥遊中國還真的只能由那邊的人來評論。
I’ll probably be over the glowing neon in a week, but for now I like what I’ve done to my blog lowkey.party, made with BSSG by 
@stefanoStefano Marinelli
Most posts migrated over, still a few of my latest ones to go. I need to post more like I did in 2022, there’s some good #photography #blog posts there I reckon.
Phew! Blog now all updated with old posts! Once I am happy with the the theme, I am happy for it to be included in themes if you wish @stefanoStefano Marinelli
I need to recheck it with fresh eyes a few times (and yes I am aware it is garish and not to everyone’s taste haha!).
RE: https://quiescent.cafe/objects/0d1274b1-f645-40ea-8d9c-4be5f071b4e2
prefers-reduced-transparency - CSS | MDN
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@media/prefers-reduced-transparency#browser_compatibility
いつの間にかこんなメディア特性が生えていたのか。以前にCSSをいじったときにはこれがなかったから仕方なく`prefers-contrast`で代替していたけど
ちょいえろぶいちゃえち動画を作ってしまった・・・
消し芸タイミングを計らねばな・・・
ﾜﾚｹﾝｾﾞﾝ
misskey
Claude Codeの会話ログをDuckDBで分析して自分の仕事スタイルを改善する方法 - yasuhisa's blog
https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2022/06/what-is-the-servant-economy/
<html><head></head><body>
With the collapse of VC subsidised convenience firms - for example instant grocery delivery apps - the modern world is facing a minor meltdown. No more biscuits on demand! No more cheap drivers at your beck and call! Calamity!
Some have dubbed this The End of the Servant Economy.
Perhaps it is. But what do we mean by a "servant"?
If I lived in Downton Abbey or Bridgerton (I wish!) then the distinction between servant and not would be fairly clear. A servant is someone who lives in your home, who works exclusively for you, performing menial tasks.
On-demand grocery delivery riders don't tend to live with their customers. Nor are they exclusive either to supplier or customer. So they're not servants in that sense.
Are they menial? Is that what we mean by servants?
It takes a lot of skill to properly clean a house. A cook needs command of a kitchen and the skill to know what to order. A butler must be trained in etiquette and household management.
Some of these tasks are things that any competent adult could learn to do. But it is sometimes necessary to pay a skilled labourer for their expertise. And it is sometimes necessary to pay an unskilled labourer for their time.
Would you describe an emergency plumber or electrician as a servant? Probably not. But you press a button in an app and a plumber runs along and cleans up your mess. How is that different from ordering a delivery driver?
Perhaps the title "servant" is now only reserved for someone who has a low level of skill? This is a confusing situation!
I briefly chatted to the author of the "Servant Economy" article to try and bash-out the edges of the argument.
상어학산타 
Danny Garside
I think that's a reasonable starting point.
In a literal sense, anyone who serves you is a servant. A waiter in a restaurant is a servant. You could just as easily walk to the kitchen to give your order, pick it up when ready, and clear your plates away at the end.
So there is sort-of a psychological aspect to this. We don't make a demand of the waiter's labour. They walk up to our table and offer their services to us.
There's a "beck and call" aspect. The ability to demand that someone serves you. A taxi driver cruising the streets is offering their services - which you accept when you hail them. You calling the taxi company via phone and requesting them is just that - a request. But the algorithm and incentives behind most popular apps creates a demand. If they don't fulfil your demand (and don't receive a good ranking) they are at risk of penalisation.
So the nature of servitude becomes one of power dynamics. Plumbers are in short supply - so they can deny your demand without penalty. A delivery driver knows they can be quickly replaced - and are therefore at high risk of being penalised if they refuse your demand.
If you have have power over someone, they become your servant. Is that right?
The French psychologist Pascale Molinier wrote a wonderful paper which I found in The Commoner called "Of Feminists and Their Cleaning Ladies". In it she describes the tension of being a feminist and outsourcing traditional female domestic roles to other women:
... [T]he relationship with the cleaner displays a psychological tension between the desire to be served without needing to think about it – in which we find what Joan Tronto refers to as the "irresponsibility of privileged people" – and the desire to create a reciprocal link which "domesticates" this relationship.
This tension is not specific to the relationship between female employers and their domestic employees, it interrogates our relationship with care more widely, in that we all benefit from it.
P. Molinier, Of Feminists and their Cleaning Ladies: caught between the reciprocity of care and the desire for depersonalisation, Multitudes 2009/3-4, no. 37-38, p. 113-121
For lots of us, we know that we could walk down to the shops to pick up biscuits. But we value our time above that of someone else's labour. So we exercise our spending power to temporarily demand someone fulfils our whims.
Ultimately then, I think this comes down to guilt. We flatter ourselves that we live in an egalitarian society. Interacting with people when there is a significant disparity in our relative power causes us cognitive dissonance. So we - perhaps somewhat dismissively - define certain people as servants.
Despite the fact that they are doing a valuable job (both socially useful and evidently worth paying for) it gets designated as a mere frippery.
I'm going to miss the era of Venture-Capital subsidised services. I think the people doing the hard work to actually get goods into customers' hands shouldn't be thought of as servants; they should be thought of as co-founders.
</body></html>
あついー…
そういえばLiquid Glass UIにおいてアクセシビリティの"Reduce transparency"などの設定はどうなるのだろう
blog.3.5mbps.net
"약을 끊어서 요요가 온게 아니라,
사람이 안 바뀌어서 요요가 온 거에요"
역시 사람이 바뀌어야 살이 빠진다...
어제부터 Jujutsu라는 버전 관리 시스템을 써보고 있습니다. git의 branch는 연속적인 단일 작업을 표현하는 느낌이 강하게 드는데 사실 그저 어느 commit을 가리키는 포인터일 뿐이라는 걸 느끼게 해주네요. Jujutsu에서는 같은 커밋에서 다음 커밋을 여러 개 만들면 그게 브랜치이고, 여러 커밋을 parent로 하는 커밋을 하나 만들면 그게 머지이고, 수정이 다 끝나면 그냥 원하는 브랜치 이름의 포인터를 적절히 옮기면 됩니다. 부분 변경을 커밋 간에 자유롭게 옮길 수 있는 것까지 합치면 재미있는 사용 방법이 많이 있을 것 같습니다. 특히 megamerge workflow를 쓰면 git 쓰다가 생겼던 "지금 하는 작업을 끝내야 다음 변경사항을 작업"하는 강박이 해소될 것 같아 기대가 많이 됩니다.
국비로 지원해주는 교육에서는 네이버랑 핀터에서 이미지 긁어와서 에아이 돌려가지고 애니메이션 만드는 수업을 하면서 현재로는 법이 없어 상업적 이용도 된다는 소리를 하는 강사가 오는 판이라 한국 시장 너무 개판났고 기대도 안됨
어제 거의 3시에 자서 늦게 일어날 줄 알았는데 일찍 일어나버려서 하루가 길음
バージョン番号の規則はMe以前のWindows、UIはVista、もう一つ何かが欲しいな（？）
소설표지 15만원 글 쓴 사람인데요.
ai아니었고 실제로 수제 일러 표지를 저렇게 받고 있어서 놀라서 들고왔던건데 실제 시장 단가 자체는 저렇게 낮지 않다는 제보를 받았습니다.
그러니 15만원에 표지 해달라고 들고오는 것들 있으면 엄청난 후려치기니까 단호히 거부하십시오
괜한 공포감 조성이 될 것 같아 인용의 포스트는 지우겠습니다
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:3ujqspjwmbihh3ooeoane6bs/post/3lrn3gjives2q
선거철이 되면 한국에서는 선거 공보물에 2차원 바코드가 삽입되는 모습을 볼 수 있습니다. 국내 기업 "보이스아이"사의 독자 규격 2차원 바코드입니다. (시각장애인이 사용할 수 있는) 무료 스마트폰 앱을 쓰면 바코드에 들어있는 정보, 즉 공보물 속에 적힌 글자를 확인할 수 있습니다. 소리내어 읽어주기도 하지요.
선거철에는 선거 공보물 제작 담당자가 바코드 생성 프로그램을 무료로 사용할 수 있게 제공되긴 합니다. 그렇다면, 이를 QR 코드로 대체하기는 얼마나 어려울까요. 아직 한국에서는 URL주소를 QR코드로 담는 수준을 넘어 '한글 데이터'자체를 QR코드에 담는 모습을 많이 보진 못했는데요. 단순히 개발자라면 할 수 있는가, 의 문제를 넘어 어떤 문제들이 기다리고 있을지.
10년쯤 전부터 고민하던 문제인데 아직 명확한 답은 못 찾았습니다.
올해 파이콘은 벌써 제안마감했군요. 내년 파이콘에는 발표제안을 해볼까...
TIL: Pillow는 8bpc를 넘어가는 컬러 이미지를 지원하지 않는다... 그 말은 HDR 이미지를 다루기 힘들다는 뜻
いまのところ聞いた中で、GPTの一番頭のいい使い方は「反省文を書かせる」。無意味で嫌だけど自分のほうが弱い立場上どうしても書かざるをえないくだらないものを、それを書く面倒を省いて自分がやったことにしてくれる！そういうのこそやらせるべきだよAIにｗ でも物を教えてもらうのは絶対やめようね…
Note de règlement intérieur concernant la participation à des fils de discussions que j'ouvre.
Chacun établit ses propres règles (ou pas). En ce qui me concerne, quand j'ouvre une discussion en publiant un message, je tiens à ce qu'elle obéisse à ce qu'on pourrait appeler une "éthique de la discussion" (ou des "conditions minimales de discussion" voir note en bas de page). Rassurez-vous, rien de très compliqué, ni de très original.
1. Les débats doivent être argumentés. Si vous n'avez pas assez de caractères disponibles pour fournir une argumentation développée, changez d'instance ou proposez une suite de messages numérotés pour qu'on s'y retrouve.
2. Quand c'est possible et pertinent, une affirmation ou une critique doit être sourcée. J'en ai un peu ma claque des affirmations à l'emporte pièce qui ne font que s'aligner sur un discours mainstream (quel qu'il soit), sous le régime du "ça va de soi", ou "cela est tenu pour acquis". Une vidéo ou un article de 3 lignes dans un média à la mode n'est pas une source très convaincante : à tout le moins, ça mérite commentaire.
3. Prendre soin de la pluralité des opinions, et de la complexité du monde. Accepter de sortir de son quant-à-soi, de son identité idéologique crispée. Se garder comme du lait sur le feu de toute essentialisation. Admettre qu'on ignore bien des choses, beaucoup plus qu'on en connaît. Ne pas prendre pour argent comptant ce que disent les "autorités" en la matière, aussi admirables soit-elles. Songez à varier les perspectives : les débats franco-français sont rarement pertinents sur les fils de discussion que je propose, il existe des milliers d'autres manières de penser et d'habiter le monde - et c'est ce qui le rend si complexe.
Etc.
4. Je refuse catégoriquement toute intervention qui manifeste de la violence, du mépris, de la condescendance, de l'humiliation. Il y a bien assez de violence comme ça. Si on considère qu'un désaccord est trop profond, on peut le signifier en quelques mots, bloquer la personne, s'abstraire de la discussion. Ça arrive. C'est inévitable. Mais ça ne justifie pas de rajouter une couche de violence pour "avoir le dernier mot". Bloquer quelqu'un est déjà suffisamment violent comme ça (et peut répondre à une violence subie), mais a le mérite de clore le cycle de la violence au moins à cet endroit.
5. Règle absolument impérative (je bloque direct en cas de défaut) : jamais d'attaque ad persona sur mes fils de discussion. Jamais de procès de la personne qui parle "en tant que personne". Si cette personne vous insupporte, bloquez-la. Si mon règlement vous insupporte, bloquez-moi. Dites vous toujours que la personne avec laquelle vous discutez a sa propre biographie intellectuelle, politique, affective, qui diffère probablement en partie de la vôtre, et qu'elle a des raisons pour penser ce qu'elle pense. Tout savoir est situé. Il n'existe pas de point de vue valide universellement.
6. Lâchez-moi la grappe avec vos histoires de partis politiques et leur prêt-à-penser en vue des élections et blablabla - j'en ai rien à carrer, mais vraiment. J'ai 57 ans, j'en ai vu défiler des injonctions à voter comme il faut. Si vous voulez vous exciter le bourrichon à ce sujet, peu m'en chaut, mais pas sur mes fils de discussion : spoiler : ce n'est jamais le sujet !
et 7. Il n'est pas interdit d'admettre qu'on a tort, qu'on a parlé trop vite, que l'autre a raison, que sa perspective fait sens même si elle n'est pas celle qu'on privilégie, que ce qui paraît pertinent à un instant T peut ne plus l'être autant à l'instant suivant,, et que deux personnes en désaccord puissent avoir raison en même temps !!
NB : ces recommandations s'appliquent évidemment au fil de discussion susceptible de s'ouvrir sous ce message. Ce qui m'intéresserait plutôt, c'est de connaître vos propres "règlements intérieurs" , implicites ou explicites.
Pour ceux que ça intéresse, Wilfred Rupert Bion, le grand psychanalyste anglais, parlait de "conditions minimales d'exercice" concernant la pratique de l'analyse. Je m'en inspire ici. Notez bien que ces conditions peuvent être amenées à évoluer dans le temps évidemment. On n'est plus le même à 60 ans qu'à 20 ans, et le cours de l'histoire, les choses qu'on ignorait et qu'on apprend, peut contraindre à les modifier. Enfin, aujourd'hui, et pour le moment, voici mes règles.
たぬけーちゃんだ
窩箱子窩得好像在泡澡 
뭐야 날씨 왜이래!!!!!!! 
UPSをピーピー言わせながらサーバーを移動させるなど
いっぱい載ってる #北きつね牧場
Das Messerverbot im ÖPNV ist ein Symbol: Der Staat nimmt dem Bürger das Vertrauen. Statt Ursachen von Gewalt zu bekämpfen, bekämpft man Werkzeuge. Man schafft Gesetze für Schlagzeilen, nicht für Gerechtigkeit oder gar Sicherheit. #EinfacheSprache
맹꽁이
낭만케로 
MJ+
