What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
0
0
0
0

We are wrapping up day 1 of LeadDev London at the Intercontinental O2!
If you've not come to see us yet - we are still here for another day tomorrow with some great swag and even greater conversation!

Come find us in the Solutions Zone!

0
0

New study on the effects of LLM use (in this case on essay writing):

arxiv.org/abs/2506.08872

Quote:

"LLM users also struggled to accurately quote their own work. While LLMs offer immediate convenience, our findings highlight potential cognitive costs. Over four months, LLM users consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels. These results raise concerns about the long-term educational implications of LLM reliance and underscore the need for deeper inquiry into AI's role in learning."

The interesting thing is: People who used search engines (to find sources etc) did not show similar issues. This is an important antidote against the belief that LLM-based tools are just like search engines. Which they are not. They are massively degrading their users' mental abilities and development. Which is why these systems have absolutely no place even _near_ any school or university.

hails.org/@hailey/114691651497

arXiv logo

Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task

This study explores the neural and behavioral consequences of LLM-assisted essay writing. Participants were divided into three groups: LLM, Search Engine, and Brain-only (no tools). Each completed three sessions under the same condition. In a fourth session, LLM users were reassigned to Brain-only group (LLM-to-Brain), and Brain-only users were reassigned to LLM condition (Brain-to-LLM). A total of 54 participants took part in Sessions 1-3, with 18 completing session 4. We used electroencephalography (EEG) to assess cognitive load during essay writing, and analyzed essays using NLP, as well as scoring essays with the help from human teachers and an AI judge. Across groups, NERs, n-gram patterns, and topic ontology showed within-group homogeneity. EEG revealed significant differences in brain connectivity: Brain-only participants exhibited the strongest, most distributed networks; Search Engine users showed moderate engagement; and LLM users displayed the weakest connectivity. Cognitive activity scaled down in relation to external tool use. In session 4, LLM-to-Brain participants showed reduced alpha and beta connectivity, indicating under-engagement. Brain-to-LLM users exhibited higher memory recall and activation of occipito-parietal and prefrontal areas, similar to Search Engine users. Self-reported ownership of essays was the lowest in the LLM group and the highest in the Brain-only group. LLM users also struggled to accurately quote their own work. While LLMs offer immediate convenience, our findings highlight potential cognitive costs. Over four months, LLM users consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels. These results raise concerns about the long-term educational implications of LLM reliance and underscore the need for deeper inquiry into AI's role in learning.

arxiv.org · arXiv.org

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
44
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0

:blobcat_sing:<ここみんはいいぞ、アタッカーここみんはいいぞ
:blobcat_sing:<さぁ探索してみよう、本の虫になっている彼女を連れだして
:blobcat_sing:<一緒なら見つけ出せるはず、心の奥でかくれんぼしていた、あの時の僕が

:blobcat_sing:<過ぎ去った過去のここみんがノックする
:blobcat_sing:<おどけた顔してさ僕は進むよ、きっとあの日の君に会えるはずさ
:blobcat_sing:<May all the beauty be blessed
:blobcat_sing:<アタッカーここみんはいいぞ
:blobcat_sing:<May you, the beauty of this world always shine
:blobcat_sing:​<ここみんと一緒なら、あなたにも世界の美しさがみえるはずさ

1

I'm thrilled to announce the first release of Quark, my new reverse proxy written in 🦀

Quark v0.1.0 is out and fully functional, built on top of the robust and libraries. It's designed to offer high performance and security for your web applications.

Quark is open source and available under the MIT license.

github.com/Goliworks/Quark

0

People wonder why I don't like donations, why we don't have a Patreon. This shows exactly why: you vendor lock yourself in with VC-backed company to handle your fans. This company chases growth and eventually, your fans support is the best way to grow their revenue. theverge.com/news/687570/patre
theverge.com/news/687570/patre

0
0

@mcc eh Canadian and BC law is pretty clear that "contract" is a very broad term* and there was at least partial consideration - the developer clearly had a duty of care.

If the unpaid funds were for ongoing hosting the the developer would have had a right to take down the site, but there is no Canadian jurisdiction where a judge would permit the behaviour of the web developer.

(*one of the many reasons I spend so much of the year dealing with formal contract negotiation/signing)

0
0
0
0
1
0

이거도 주말에 생각한 건데, detail 은 어쩌다가 ディティール 가 됐는지 궁금해졌음
chocolate → チョコレート 같은 건 late 를 レート 로 잘못 읽어서 그렇게 됐구나라고 추측이라도 하는데, 왜 tail → ティール 인지는 감도 안 잡힌다
영어에서 온 게 아닌건가 의심도 했는데, 대충 찾아보니까 그렇지는 않은 듯
ディテール 라고 멀쩡히? 표기, 발음하는 경우도 있고…

0
0
0

@mcc Agreed, though this is a mess of a situation.

The developer should have had a contract with the PM and gone after the PM for lost fees, unless and more appropriately, the developer should have had a contract directly with the client.

IMO the PM is the one at fault, unless the client received the invoices and did not pay.

Technically, and apparently legally, after the engagement is over (per the contract and outstanding invoices) the developer should not have touched the site. But IANAL.

0

We’re kicking off the 2025 maintain-a-thon today at UN Open Source Week! It’s taking place in the Economic and Social Council Chamber of the UN in New York. This is perfect because maintaining public digital infrastructure is fundamental to economic and social development.

The maintain-a-thon follows an unconference format. The FOSS experts from our delegation proposed core topics grounded in real-world experience with open source maintenance.

(1/2)

Sovereign Tech Agency delegation of experts in front of UN headquarters
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Cognitive aids do not "make people dumb" and cognitive impairment does not change anything about someone's inherent worth as a member of our community. I am certainly troubled by the political alignment and uses of AI in the world but I will never sign on to a dehumanizing narrative about cognition just because I think it might work against the uses of AI I disagree with. We need better arguments than that.

0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1

In general I think we should be very cautious about sweeping claims about human intelligence and impairment of cognition. From "cellphones make you stupid" to "LLMs make you stupid", from "coding makes you a genius" to "knowing math makes you a genius." Pushing for absolutisms about human intelligence and human cognition is a toxic pattern that is also so baked into our history and cultural patterns and it plays right into dehumanization for either extreme

I think there's a lot to be said and studied about what helps or hinders our problem-solving but we need to free ourselves from this essentialist approach that's always looking to define who is "smart and dumb." It's a weapon against human well-being every time.

0