What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
0
0

직권남용 권리행사방해 - 12.3계엄 옹호 외신기자 PG(Press Guide) 작성 사실 인정 - 특검은 대통령 비서실 비서관은 사실에 따라 업무를 수행해야하고 대통령이 허위 홍보 PG를 작성하게 한 것은 의무없는 일을 하게 한 것이라, 그런 의무는 없다고 봄 - PG의 내용이 허위인지 판단해 수정하거나 전달할 의무 없음 - "무죄"

0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

왜 항상 "20대 남성" 못 잃어서 안달인지.. 그 20대 남성 대부분은 님을 중공 간첩이라고 생각하고 국힘이나 이준석 찍거나 윤어게인 외칠텐데 ㅋㅋ 걔네들한테 잘보여서 뭐할라고

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7reki7xuobtaq6iuqquznqby/post/3mciychhkzk2s

0
0
0
0

허위공문서 행사죄 - 행사된 것으로는 보기 어려움 - 이 부분은 "무죄" 국무위원 권리행사방해 관련 - 이중기소 아님 - 전원 소집통지 필요한데 안함 - 긴급상황 아님 - 국가 긴급권 오남용 행사 막기 위해 긴급할수록 절차 준수 더욱 필요 - 직권남용권리행사방해는 "유죄" - 부른 사람이 국무회의 참석 못한것은 무죄이나 교육부 과기부 등 7명과 상상적 경합이므로 별도 선고 안할 것. 국무위원 대상 직권남용권리행사방해죄 관련 - 비상계엄과 연관되어 작성된 문서 - 허위 문서 - 허위 공문서 작성죄 "유죄"

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

"FASCISM! An Army Orientation Fact Sheet, 1945

Fascism is a way to run a country—it’s the way Italy was run, and the way Germany and Japan are run. Fascism is the precise opposite of democracy. The people run democratic governments, but fascist governments run the people.

Fascism is government by the few and for the few. The objective is seizure and control of the economic, political, social, and cultural life of the state.

Why? The democratic way of life interferes with their methods and desires for: (1) conducting business; (2) living with their fellow-men; (3) having the final say in matters concerning others, as well as themselves.

The basic principles of democracy stand in the way of their desires; hence — democracy must go! Anyone who is not a member of their inner gang has to do what he’s told.

They permit no civil liberties, no equality before the law. They make their own rules and change them when they choose. If you don’t like it, it’s 'T.S.' [tough shit].

They maintain themselves in power by use of force combined with propaganda based on primitive ideas of 'blood' and 'race,' by skillful manipulation of fear and hate, and by false promise of security. The propaganda glorifies war and insists it is smart and 'realistic”to be pitiless and violent.

How It Starts

Fascism came to power in Germany, Italy, and Japan at a time of social and economic unrest. A small group of men, supported in secret by powerful financial and military interests, convinced enough insecure people that fascism would give them the things they wanted.

They did so partly by clever propaganda and deception. They promised the people that fascism would bring them great power and prosperity. The details differed from country to country but the general pattern was the same.

(. . .)

To big business men and the industrialists they secretly promised greater security and profits through the elimination of small business competitors and trade unions and the crushing of socialists and communists. To the whole nation they promised glory and wealth by conquest. They asserted it was their right, as a 'superior people,' to rule the world.

As soon as these methods had won them enough of a following to form their Storm Troops, the fascists began using force to stifle and wipe out any opposition. Those who saw through the false front of fascism and opposed them were beaten, tortured, and killed.

The fascists knew that all believers in democracy were their enemies. They knew that the fundamental principle of democracy — faith in the common sense of the common people — was the direct opposite of the fascist principle of rule by the elite few. So they fought democracy in all its phases.

How It Works

It was easy enough for the fascists to promise all things to all people before they were in power. Once they were actually in power, they could not, of course, keep their contradictory promises. They had intended in advance to break some, and they did break those they had made to the middle classes, the workers, and the farmers.

As soon as the fascists were in control of the government, the torturings and the killings were no longer the unlawful acts of a political party and its hoodlum gangs. They became official government policy.

Among the first victims of this official policy were those farmers, workers, and small business men who had believed the promises that had been made to them and who complained that they had been .sucked in.'

Some simply vanished. Often they came home to their families by return mail in little jars of ashes.

The concentration camps and graves filled with the opponents of fascism. Out went equality before the law, free elections and free political parties, independent trade unions and independent schools, freedom of speech and freedom of the press, and, in time, freedom of religion."

newyorkalmanack.com/2026/01/fa

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

요샌 자기가 본 비젼을 어떻게 영상까지 합쳐서 올리던데 (아들이 해주는듯) ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 트럼프는 일어날수 밖에 없는 일을 미루려고 애를 쓰고 있다 라는 내용 www.youtube.com/shorts/otrhd... 그리고 위의 선거 관련 내용 영상. www.youtube.com/shorts/jG46R... 이분의 의견은 이렇다 이고 (예언과 관계없이) 나오는 관련 지표 보면 경제가 무너지긴할텐데 어떻게 구체적으로 전개될진 저도 잘 모르겠더라고요 (..)

0
0
0

ちょっと気になるな、支援検討中
44平米だと蟹ブックスくらいの広さか

作業スペースありだとそんなに冊数増やせなさそうだけど、上手くいけば広いとこに引っ越したり…できると良いね

Webエンジニアの学びのための「技術書ライブラリー」開設に向けクラウドファンディングを実施
prtimes.jp/main/html/rd/p/0000

0
0

Somewhere between pacifism that is just passivism and starting a pyrrhic hot war that only entrenches authoritarianism, there’s some kind of jiu jitsu here that is active and forceful resistance, but uses the regime’s own force against them.

I do not pretend to know what exactly that is. I do believe that a diversity of tactics is important — and that we’re all going to have to accept the work of holding ourselves together as a resistance even as people choose very different tactics we’re not comfortable with ourselves.

@inthehandsPaul Cantrell I'm going suggest reading the first half of "Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife" by Col. John Nagl. amazon.com/Learning-Eat-Soup-K You're essentially fighting an insurgency of well-equipped fanatics who lack local support, logistics, and discipline. Nagl is smart, he revised the Army's counterinsurgency manual, and he compares how the British in Malaysia effectively defeated communist insurgents while still keeping the public on their side.

The book is not so much on military operation but on winning hearts and minds, showing how one army did and another army didn't in very similar conflicts.

That's essentially your challenge - direct armed confrontation will not work, surrender will not work, but the current tactics seem to slowly be working. Tracking them, getting in their way, goading them til they lose discipline, not letting them have a good night's rest, pressuring companies not to do business with them - all that corrodes their morale. The danger is someone else will snap and shoot another poet in the face again. But they've already proven they'll do that casually so there's really no additional risk.

They're an occupying force. Make them feel that every day until they leave. Make every Minnesota winter day that much colder and more miserable for them. Be like the northern Midwest winter and make them hate life.

0

Somewhere between pacifism that is just passivism and starting a pyrrhic hot war that only entrenches authoritarianism, there’s some kind of jiu jitsu here that is active and forceful resistance, but uses the regime’s own force against them.

I do not pretend to know what exactly that is. I do believe that a diversity of tactics is important — and that we’re all going to have to accept the work of holding ourselves together as a resistance even as people choose very different tactics we’re not comfortable with ourselves.

0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
1
0