What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

Niemand fรผhrt mehr Krieg, nur noch โ€žSpezialoperationenโ€, niemand wird mehr ausgebeutet, sondern es gibt nur noch โ€žScheinselbststรคndigkeitโ€, niemand will gegen Queere hetzen, sondern steht lediglich fรผr die โ€žtraditionelle Familieโ€ ein. Doch wenn der Euphemismus stirbt, erkennt auch jeder, dass der Faschismus plรถtzlich da ist.

0

@django @liaizonwakest โ‚ @voboda

Thank you, I really like the article. It describes a whole bunch of activities and consideration where Social experience design evolves methodical solution development practices.

A social experience can be seen as "how people experience a solution" and this includes how that solution interacts with other solutions these people were already exposed to i.e. it accounts for the externalities of technology introduction. Social experiences work at different scales which design perspectives account for:

coding.social/blog/reimagine-s

An issue on the app-centric fedi is that app devs have a technical view of the fediverse, while 'fedizens' have a social one, leading to expectation mismatches. Apps are typically developed for 2 stakeholders: "Users" and the devs themselves (the de-facto owners of 'app-space').

While feature driven app-focused design may improve social experience for app users, it pays insufficient attention to the overall experience of the fediverse.

SX Pyramid of Perspective has 3 layers. The bottom layer starts with the individual perspective where personal needs are satisfied as social activities take place. The layer above focuses on inter-personal perspective where social relationship are formed into a social graph. The top of the pyramid shows the societal perspective where solutions are designed to have societal imprint and may affect entire societal constructs.

@django @liaizonwakest โ‚ @voboda

When looking through the lens of Social experience design we can say that the fediverse-we-have and the social network promise in the W3C specs, have become diverged to the extent they are hard forks.

A solution is said to exist as soon as you can write it down on a sticky note in the form of a vision, need, objective, or solution.

The AS/AP fediverse sticky note reads: "The future of social networking is decentralized".

The fediverse-we-have note reads: "Decentralized microblogging"

Besides that both sticky notes express a tech focus, exist in the technosphere not sociosphere, they express no vision.. A place where we want to be, and why. There is complete misconception both on technical, let alone social direction, and that leads to endless confusion and again those mismatched expectations.

App devs now try to hammer their apps onto "Decentralized microblogging" in hopes "future of social networking" somehow emerges. That is unlikely.

0
0
1

I'm thinking of proposing a /social web community track at @COSCUP 2026 (Aug 8โ€“9, Taipei)โ€”think FOSDEM's Social Web devroom, but in East Asia. Before I submit the CFP, I'd love to get a sense of what to call it. What do you think?

(Boosts appreciated!)

@hongminheeๆดช ๆฐ‘ๆ†™ (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary: @COSCUP

As you know I am proponent to emphasize the social aspects more, to drive healthy evolution of the .

The app-centric is a pure technosphere, where a tech-first approach deals with getting app features to the next app, and the protocol matures via post-facto 'follow-the-leader' . What happens in the sociosphere between people using the tech is de-facto of secondary concern, and apps are tweaked to try to deal with externalities. The resulting social landscape has become one of neighboring app kingdoms with guarded borders separating them. Everyone speaks microblog to each other, albeit with thick accents, hard to understand. The fediverse is social *because* of the people, and despite of the tech, that still severely restrains them.

It would be nice if the track name not just indicated a technology name. E.g. coding.social uses:

- Fediverse, a peopleverse
-
-

0
0
0
3
0
0
1

I'm writing this in English.

Not because English is my first languageโ€”it isn't. I'm writing this in English because if I wrote it in Korean, the people I'm addressing would run it through an outdated translator, misread it, and respond to something I never said. The responsibility for that mistranslation would fall on me. It always does.

This is the thing Eugen Rochko's post misses, despite its good intentions.

@GargronEugen Rochko argues that LLMs are no substitute for human translators, and that people who think otherwise don't actually rely on translation. He's right about some of this. A machine-translated novel is not the same as one rendered by a skilled human translator. But the argument rests on a premise that only makes sense from a certain position: that translation is primarily about quality, about the aesthetic experience of reading literature in another language.

For many of us, translation is first about access.

The professional translation market doesn't scale to cover everything. It never has. What gets translatedโ€”and into which languagesโ€”follows the logic of cultural hegemony. Works from dominant Western languages flow outward, translated into everything. Works from East Asian languages trickle in, selectively, slowly, on someone else's schedule. The asymmetry isn't incidental; it's structural.

@GargronEugen Rochko notes, fairly, that machine translation existed decades before LLMs. But this is only half the story, and which half matters depends entirely on which languages you're talking about. European language pairs were reasonably serviceable with older tools. Koreanโ€“English, Japaneseโ€“English, Chineseโ€“English? Genuinely usable translation for these pairs arrived with the LLM era. Treating โ€œmachine translationโ€ as a monolithic technology with a uniform history erases the experience of everyone whose language sits far from the Indo-European center.

There's also something uncomfortable in the framing of the button-press thought experiment: โ€œI would erase LLMs even if it took machine translation with it.โ€ For someone whose language has always been peripheral, that button looks very different. It's not an abstract philosophical position; it's a statement about whose access to information is expendable.

I want to be clear: none of this is an argument that LLMs are good, or that the harms @GargronEugen Rochko describes aren't real. They are. But a critique of AI doesn't become more universal by ignoring whose languages have always been on the margins. If anything, a serious critique of AI's political economy should be more attentive to those asymmetries, not less.

The fact that I'm writing this in English, carefully, so it won't be misreadโ€”that's not incidental to my argument. That is my argument.

5
13
0
0

์›์–ด๋ฏผ์ด ๋งํ•˜๋Š” ๋ผ์ด์˜จํ‚น

์ฐพ์•„๋ณด๋ฉด ์ € ์ •๋„๋Š” ์•„๋‹ˆ๊ณ  "์•„๋ฒ„์ง€ (์กฑ์žฅ๋‹˜), ์‚ฌ์ž๊ฐ€ ์˜ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค" ์ •๋„์˜ ์˜๋ฏธ๋ผ๊ณ .

์—ญ์‹œ ๊ณจ๋“ ๋ถ€์ € ๋ฐ›์€ ์ฝ”๋ฏธ๋””์–ธ์€ ๋ณด๋ฒ•์ด ๋‹ค๋ฅด๋„ค ใ…‹

0
0
0
0

์›์–ด๋ฏผ์ด ๋งํ•˜๋Š” ๋ผ์ด์˜จํ‚น

์ฐพ์•„๋ณด๋ฉด ์ € ์ •๋„๋Š” ์•„๋‹ˆ๊ณ  "์•„๋ฒ„์ง€ (์กฑ์žฅ๋‹˜), ์‚ฌ์ž๊ฐ€ ์˜ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค" ์ •๋„์˜ ์˜๋ฏธ๋ผ๊ณ .

์—ญ์‹œ ๊ณจ๋“ ๋ถ€์ € ๋ฐ›์€ ์ฝ”๋ฏธ๋””์–ธ์€ ๋ณด๋ฒ•์ด ๋‹ค๋ฅด๋„ค ใ…‹

0
0

๊น€์–ด์ค€์”จ์˜ ์œ ํŠœ๋ธŒ ๋ฐฉ์†ก์—์„œ ์ •๋ถ€์™€ ๊ฒ€์ฐฐ์˜ โ€˜์ด์žฌ๋ช… ๋Œ€ํ†ต๋ น ๊ณต์†Œ์ทจ์†Œ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์„คโ€™ ์ฃผ์žฅ์ด ์ œ๊ธฐ๋œ ๋ฐ ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ •์„ฑํ˜ธ ๋ฒ•๋ฌด๋ถ€ ์žฅ๊ด€์ด 11์ผ โ€œํ™ฉ๋‹นํ•œ ์Œ๋ชจ๋ก โ€์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ์ผ์ถ•ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ •์„ฑํ˜ธ ์žฅ๊ด€, ์ด ๋Œ€ํ†ต๋ น ๊ณต์†Œ์ทจ์†Œ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์„ค์— โ€œํ™ฉ๋‹นํ•œ ์Œ...

0
0
0

ไบ‹ๆฅญใƒใƒผใƒ ใฎใ‚ณใƒณใƒ†ใ‚ญใ‚นใƒˆๆƒ…ๅ ฑใ‚’Claudeใซ่“„็ฉใƒปๆดป็”จใ•ใ›ใ‚‹ใƒ—ใƒฉใ‚ฐใ‚คใƒณใ‚’ไฝœใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใฎใƒ—ใƒฉใ‚ฐใ‚คใƒณใ‚’ไฝœใฃใŸ
dev.classmethod.jp/articles/co

ไบ‹ๆฅญใƒใƒผใƒ ใฎใ‚ณใƒณใƒ†ใ‚ญใ‚นใƒˆๆƒ…ๅ ฑใ‚’Claudeใซ่“„็ฉใƒปๆดป็”จใ•ใ›ใ‚‹ใƒ—ใƒฉใ‚ฐใ‚คใƒณใ‚’ไฝœใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใฎใƒ—ใƒฉใ‚ฐใ‚คใƒณใ‚’ไฝœใฃใŸ | DevelopersIO

AIใฎๆฅญๅ‹™ๆดป็”จใงๆœฌๅฝ“ใฎใƒœใƒˆใƒซใƒใƒƒใ‚ฏใซใชใ‚‹ใฎใฏใ€ใƒขใƒ‡ใƒซใฎๆ€ง่ƒฝใงใฏใชใใ‚ณใƒณใƒ†ใ‚ญใ‚นใƒˆใฎไธ่ถณใงใ™ใ€‚ๆกˆไปถๆƒ…ๅ ฑใ‚„ใƒŠใƒฌใƒƒใ‚ธใŒๆ•ฃใ‚‰ใฐใ‚Šใ€่“„็ฉใ‚‚็ถšใ‹ใชใ„ใ€‚ใ“ใฎ่ชฒ้กŒใซๅฏพใ—ใฆใ€Claudeใซๆƒ…ๅ ฑใฎๅŽ้›†ใƒปๆง‹้€ ๅŒ–ใ‚’ไปปใ›ใฆไบบ้–“ใฏ็ขบ่ชใƒปๆ‰ฟ่ชใ™ใ‚‹ใ ใ‘ใฎใƒ—ใƒฉใ‚ฐใ‚คใƒณใจใ€ใใ‚Œใ‚’ใƒใƒผใƒ ใ”ใจใซ็”Ÿๆˆใงใใ‚‹ใ‚ธใ‚งใƒใƒฌใƒผใ‚ฟใƒผใ‚’ไฝœใ‚Šใพใ—ใŸใ€‚

dev.classmethod.jp ยท ใ‚ฏใƒฉใ‚นใƒกใ‚ฝใƒƒใƒ‰็™บใ€Œใ‚„ใฃใฆใฟใŸใ€็ณปๆŠ€่ก“ใƒกใƒ‡ใ‚ฃใ‚ข | DevelopersIO

0
0

10์ผ ์ค‘๊ตญ์ค‘์•™(CC)TVยท์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ณด ๋“ฑ ์ค‘๊ตญ๋งค์ฒด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ์ค‘๊ตญ์ธ๋ฏผ์ •์น˜ํ˜‘์ƒํšŒ์˜(์ •ํ˜‘) ์œ„์›์ธ ์ค‘๊ตญ์ดจ๋ฉ”์ด๋Œ€ํ•™ ๋žด์˜ค์ƒน์ค‘ ๋‹น์„œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์–‘ํšŒ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ์ธํ„ฐ๋ทฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด "์ง€๋‚œํ•ด ๋ฒˆ์—ญยท์ดฌ์˜ ๋“ฑ ํ•™๋ถ€ ์ „๊ณต 16๊ฐœ๋ฅผ ํ•œ ๋ฒˆ์— ํ์ง€ํ–ˆ๋‹ค"๊ณ  ๋งํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋“ฑ๋ก 2026-03-10 16:52

10์ผ ์ค‘๊ตญ์ค‘์•™(CC)TVยท์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ณด ๋“ฑ ์ค‘๊ตญ๋งค์ฒด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด...

0
0

My daughter just asked me how to say ๅŽจไบŒ็—… (ไธญไบŒ็—…) in English. Looking through various translations, the one that strikes me as least awful is "teen angst," but it fails to capture the narcissism, pretentiousness, and sense of superiority of chลซnibyล. "Main Character Syndrome" captures that aspect, but fails to identify the specific age bracket where this most commonly occurs, which is to say early teens. Please knock my socks off with an awesome translation.

0

์ธ์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์–ด๋А ๋ถ„์ด ์˜ฌ๋ ค์ฃผ์…จ๋Š”๋ฐ ์ •๋ง ์˜คํ”ผ์…œํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ง€์—ญ ์•„์ด๋Œ์ธ ๋“ฏ. x.com/lumate1217/s...

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:a6qvfkbrohedqy3dt6k5mdv6/post/3mgp2v74psc25

0

โ€žPล™edstava, ลพe ฤlovฤ›k je ve svรฉm ลพivotฤ› protagonistou a ostatnรญ hrajรญ jen vedlejลกรญ role, se ze sociรกlnรญch sรญtรญ pล™elรฉvรก do reality. Kromฤ› ekonomickรฉho bohatstvรญ jsou tyto postoje podpoล™eny terapeutickou kulturou, kterรก lidem vtiskla pล™edstavu, ลพe vลกechny jejich pocity jsou za jakรฝchkoliv okolnostรญ plnฤ› validnรญ. K tomu je navรญc vybavila pojmy, jako jsou _hranice_ nebo _potล™eby_, jeลพ ฤasto napomรกhajรญ zamฤ›ลˆovรกnรญ toho, co ฤlovฤ›k skuteฤnฤ› potล™ebuje, sโ€ฏtรญm, co jednoduลกe chce.โ€œ denikalarm.cz/2026/03/zlato-z-

0

I'm writing this in English.

Not because English is my first languageโ€”it isn't. I'm writing this in English because if I wrote it in Korean, the people I'm addressing would run it through an outdated translator, misread it, and respond to something I never said. The responsibility for that mistranslation would fall on me. It always does.

This is the thing Eugen Rochko's post misses, despite its good intentions.

@GargronEugen Rochko argues that LLMs are no substitute for human translators, and that people who think otherwise don't actually rely on translation. He's right about some of this. A machine-translated novel is not the same as one rendered by a skilled human translator. But the argument rests on a premise that only makes sense from a certain position: that translation is primarily about quality, about the aesthetic experience of reading literature in another language.

For many of us, translation is first about access.

The professional translation market doesn't scale to cover everything. It never has. What gets translatedโ€”and into which languagesโ€”follows the logic of cultural hegemony. Works from dominant Western languages flow outward, translated into everything. Works from East Asian languages trickle in, selectively, slowly, on someone else's schedule. The asymmetry isn't incidental; it's structural.

@GargronEugen Rochko notes, fairly, that machine translation existed decades before LLMs. But this is only half the story, and which half matters depends entirely on which languages you're talking about. European language pairs were reasonably serviceable with older tools. Koreanโ€“English, Japaneseโ€“English, Chineseโ€“English? Genuinely usable translation for these pairs arrived with the LLM era. Treating โ€œmachine translationโ€ as a monolithic technology with a uniform history erases the experience of everyone whose language sits far from the Indo-European center.

There's also something uncomfortable in the framing of the button-press thought experiment: โ€œI would erase LLMs even if it took machine translation with it.โ€ For someone whose language has always been peripheral, that button looks very different. It's not an abstract philosophical position; it's a statement about whose access to information is expendable.

I want to be clear: none of this is an argument that LLMs are good, or that the harms @GargronEugen Rochko describes aren't real. They are. But a critique of AI doesn't become more universal by ignoring whose languages have always been on the margins. If anything, a serious critique of AI's political economy should be more attentive to those asymmetries, not less.

The fact that I'm writing this in English, carefully, so it won't be misreadโ€”that's not incidental to my argument. That is my argument.

5
13
0
1
0
1

12ยท3 ๋น„์ƒ๊ณ„์—„ ๋ฐ ์œค์„์—ด ์ „ ๋Œ€ํ†ต๋ น ๋ถ€๋ถ€ ๊ด€๋ จ ์˜ํ˜น์„ ์ˆ˜์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ถŒ์ฐฝ์˜ ํŠน๋ณ„๊ฒ€์‚ฌํŒ€์ด ๊น€๋ช…์ˆ˜ ์ „ ํ•ฉ๋™์ฐธ๋ชจ๋ณธ๋ถ€ ์˜์žฅ ๋“ฑ ๋‚ด๋ž€์— ๊ฐ€๋‹ดํ–ˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์˜ํ˜น์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š” ํ•ฉ์ฐธ ๊ด€๊ณ„์ž๋ฅผ ๋ฌด๋”๊ธฐ๋กœ ์ž…๊ฑดํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ข…ํ•ฉํŠน๊ฒ€, ๊น€๋ช…์ˆ˜ ์ „ ํ•ฉ์ฐธ์˜์žฅ ๋“ฑ ๋‚ด๋ž€ ํ˜์˜ ์ž…๊ฑด

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1

Ich finde es sehr zuvorkommend, dass eine CDU und SPD jetzt schon die Machtinstrumente einfรผhrt und Machtรผbergriffe normalisiert, sodass eine AfD nicht mal ein viel autoritรคreres Deutschland schaffen muss, sondern sich einfach in den Chefsessel setzen und loslegen kann. Endlich mal Politik die vorausschaut!

Ein Screenshot eines Netzpolitik.org Artikels: Attacke auf die Zivilgesellschaft

Wenn der Geheimdienst Buchhandlungen ins Visier nimmt

Die Bundesregierung lรคsst jetzt sogar Buchhandlungen vom Verfassungsschutz รผberprรผfen - ohne klare Rechtsgrundlage und ohne Wissen der Betroffenen. Mehr als 1200 Organisationen und Projekte wurden schon durchleuchtet. Wie das Haber-Verfahren die Zivilgesellschaft einschรผchtert. Eine Analyse.

06.03.2026 um 15:16 Uhr - Markus Reuter - in รœberwachung - 8 Ergรคnzungen
0

์ด๋ฒˆ์— ์‚ฌ๋“œ ๋ฏธ์‚ฌ์ผ์„ ํ•œ๊ตญ์—์„œ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์ด ๋นผ๊ฐ„๊ฑด... ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ ๋กœ๋งˆ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ค์›Œ์กŒ์„๋•Œ ์ž๊ตญ ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ์ ๋ นํ•œ(?) ์˜ํ† ์—์„œ ์ฒ ์ˆ˜ ์‹œํ‚ค๋ฉด์„œ ์ ์ฐจ ์˜ํ† ๊ฐ€ ์ค„์–ด๋“ ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๋งฅ๋ฝ/๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ์ƒ๊ฐํ•จ๋‹ค ๊ฒฐ๊ตญ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์€ ์ด๋ ‡๊ฒŒ ๊ณ„์†ํ•ด์„œ ์ค„์ด๊ฒŒ ๋ ๊ฒƒ์ด๊ณ ์š” ๊ทธ ํ‹ˆ์€ ๋ˆ„๊ฐ€ ์ฑ„์šธ์ง€;; ์ž˜ ๋ชจ๋ฆ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค; ํ•œ๊ตญ๋„ ๊ธฐํšŒ(?)๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๊ฒ ์ง€์š”;;

0
0

RE: cosocial.ca/@timbray/116200896

> When the person opening the PR gets credit for shipping and the reviewer bears the consequences of reviewing a bad merge, you have a structural problem no tool can solve.

In a pool of bad AI takes and cringy jokes, this is something you really want to read and reflect on. The issue predates AI, but AI is going to make it so much worse, that a conflict is nearly inevitable.

0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1

Zoom launches an AI-powered office suite with Docs, Slides, and Sheets, plus AI avatars that can represent users in meetings. The company says avatar deepfake detection is also coming. AI agent builder for non-technical users and voice translator are also new. techcrunch.com/2026/03/10/zoom

0
1