Search results

Today I published an update on the supported project, which brings browser-grade Public Key Infrastructure to Linux through the efficient data format, with the core revocation engine now functional and available to test!

Beyond current progress, this post explores broader integration, performance, and future capabilities like Certificate Transparency enforcement and Merkle Tree.

This is all part of the effort to increase the resilience of machines by default, but I hope it has a wider benefit on the Linux ecosystem going forward!

discourse.ubuntu.com/t/77063

0

@itsfossIt's FOSS Ambivalence, is the one word describing my first week with Linux slightly more than 20 years ago 🥹 It was quite the humbling experience with the immense freedom to build and break everything, and the difference between the two was sometimes just a semicolon 😅 Thank you , , and for all the fun, the sleepless nights, and mostly for all the awesome work.

0
0

닷넷은 8.0이후로 Microsoft만이 아니라, Canonical, RedHat 등 각 리눅스 배포판 관리자들이 Microsoft를 대신하여 본인들의 배포판 OS에서 잘 작동할 수 있도록 검증 과정을 거쳐 독자적으로 빌드하여 패키징을 하고 있습니다.

그 덕분에 매우 유의미한 발전이 하나 있었는데, IBM 메인프레임 (s390x)과 IBM PowerPC (ppc64el)에서도 우분투 리눅스를 사용하면 이제 닷넷 10을 아주 손쉽게 apt install dotnet-sdk-10.0 명령어 하나로 바로 설치해서 쓸 수 있게 됩니다.

https://forum.dotnetdev.kr/t/ibm-s390x-ibm-powerpc-ppc64el-10/14096

2

🌗 Canonical 擴展 Ubuntu LTS 支援至 15 年,新增 Legacy add-on
➤ 為企業級應用注入更長久的生命力:Ubuntu LTS 支援年限延長解析
canonical.com/blog/canonical-e
Canonical 宣佈將長期支援 (LTS) 版 Ubuntu 的總體支援時間延長至 15 年,此舉透過新增的「Legacy add-on」得以實現。此項延長的支援服務旨在滿足特定企業和組織的需求,確保其關鍵系統能夠獲得更長時間的安全更新和技術支援。Canonical 藉此鞏固其在企業級 Linux 市場的地位,並為用戶提供更靈活的部署選項。
+ 這真是個好消息!對於那些需要長期穩定性的企業來說,15 年的支援期能省下多少重構和遷移的成本啊。
+ Legacy add-on 聽起來像是
add-on

0

I recently set myself the exercise of using modern automated tools - in particular, a combination of the large language model and the dependent type matching tactic - to try to semi-automatically formalize in a one-page proof provided by a collaborator of the (Bruno Le Floch). With these tools, I was able to more or less blindly do the formalization in 33 minutes, withou any real high level conception of how the proof proceeded. It was a very different style to how I usually formalize results, but was workable for this type of technical, non-conceptual argument where the main issue is to get the details correct rather than the "big picture".

I recorded my attempt at youtube.com/watch?v=cyyR7j2ChC . See also additional discussion at leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narr . The final proof (which is far from optimized, but got the job done) can be found at github.com/teorth/estimate_too

1
0
0
0