Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.
機能がすごい
씨발 진짜 벌써.....????? 벌써 친위 쿠데타를 준비하는 거야....????????? 진짜로 벌써 한다고..?????????????
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:u57ijrgvcnia55ummu2mhr6d/post/3lmdt737kgc2p
ショットグラスを調達したい
4/26-27に開かれる代官山蔦屋書店のSFカーニバルに、慶應SFセンターも鏡像生命に関するイベントで出ます！SF作家の茜灯里さん、チョン・ソヨンさん、センターメンバーでスペキュラティブアートの長谷川愛さん、合成生物学の藤原慶さんが登壇されます。登録は無料！ /【イベント＆オンライン配信(Zoom)】鏡写しの生命：合成生物学がもたらす生物と人類の変容 https://store.tsite.jp/daikanyama/event/humanities/46617-1242510405.html
4/26-27に開かれる代官山蔦屋書店のSFカーニバルに、慶應SFセンターも鏡像生命に関するイベントで出ます！SF作家の茜灯里さん、チョン・ソヨンさん、センターメンバーでスペキュラティブアートの長谷川愛さん、合成生物学の藤原慶さんが登壇されます。登録は無料！ /【イベント＆オンライン配信(Zoom)】鏡写しの生命：合成生物学がもたらす生物と人類の変容 https://store.tsite.jp/daikanyama/event/humanities/46617-1242510405.html
「れきちず」に全国版が登場 江戸時代の地図を現代風にデザインしたWeb地図 - ITmedia NEWS
https://www.itmedia.co.jp/news/articles/2504/09/news132.html
『データはライセンスに従えば誰でも自由に利用できる』
開発者
「街歩きや歴史散策など、さまざまな場面でご活用ください！」
ギャーーーーー
---
中国、レアアース輸出を一時停止 製錬も国有大手に限定：日本経済新聞
https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOGM221LW0S5A320C2000000/
The Supreme Court has brutally enabled the Trump administration's "path of perfect lawlessness"
Adam Serwer nails it here: https://archive.is/eiFyj
ハイボールの原液がtarballなのでは
昨日の蕨はアク抜き後醤油で薄い下味を付け、マヨとかつお節をかけていただきます 
気になってたお酒も買った
In #thunderbird 128 is it possible to convert Thunderbird's Local Folders format (looks like mbox) to Maildir format?
靴とか舐める？
ええっ、Creact React App（CRA）が非推奨に！？今までありがとう😭
https://zenn.dev/sonicmoov/articles/deprecated-create-react-app
後継はやはりvite？
tarball?(難聴)
全プログラミング言語の古いシンタックスを凝縮したマコモScriptを作りたい
あとでのも
ハイボールもらった
🚀 EuroPython 2025 tickets are on sale! 🚀 EuroPython isn’t just a conference—it’s a place where developers, data scientists, and Python enthusiasts come together to learn, share, and connect. Whether you want to level up your skills, contribute to open-source projects, or meet like-minded Pythonistas, there's something for everyone.
📅 14–20 July in Prague. We’ve kept ticket prices the same to make the event as accessible as possible!
🎟️ Get your ticket now: https://europython.eu/tickets
With the release of #Grafana 12 in May, #AngularJS support will be fully removed in all Grafana OSS, Cloud, and Enterprise instances. Here’s everything you need to know to prepare. https://grafana.com/blog/2025/04/03/angularjs-support-will-be-removed-in-grafana-12-what-you-need-to-know/?camp=blog&mdm=social
불길로 뛰어든 소방대원… 화마로부터 영양군 지켰다
승인 2025.04.09
올해 2월 개청한 영양소방서
강풍에 번진 산불 진압 위해
수일간 밤낮없이 진화작업 펼쳐
문화재 등 주요시설 방어 성공
지휘관들, 본인 자택 전소에도
주민 대피·산불진화 앞장 헌신 www.hidomin.com/news/article...
불길로 뛰어든 소방대원… 화마로부터 영양군 지켰다
내가 k8s 자체를 딱히 좋아하느건 아닌데(어차피 잘 몰라서 좋고 싫고 할것도 없음), 근데 요즘은 처음부터 k8s 쓰는게 오버엔지니어링은 아니게 되었다.
k3s같은 것도 있고(NixOS로 하면 5분이면 띄운다), 어차피 머신 적을때는 별로 설정할것도 없을 것이다. 혹시 뭔가 +알파로 해줘야할게 있을때 helm install로 날먹 할수 있다는 여지도 있다. 그 다음에 서비스 운영은 이제 docker-compose up하냐, kubectl apply -f deployment.yaml 하냐의 차이가 된다.
근데 또 복잡하지 않은 인프라라면, 때가되서 k8s로 옮기는 것도 크게 어렵지 않을 것이다. 나는 '옮기는' 종류의 일을 매우 하기 싫어/두려워하기 때문에(DB 마이그레이션 처럼) 그냥 service.k3s.enabled = true 해버린다.
RE: https://hackers.pub/@ujuc/0196189f-1c95-7120-831b-27d7c51e8f38
Misskeyを2025.4.0にアップデートした
보수도 진보도 질색하는 “기회주의자 끝판왕” 한덕수
www.hani.co.kr//arti/politi...
”야권은 한 권한대행이 윤석열 탄핵심판이 진행되던 중에는 형식적 권한 행사에 그치는 국회 몫 헌법재판관 후보자 임명을 거부하다가 윤 전 대통령 파면 뒤 돌연 태도를 바꾼 배경에 주목한다. 일각에선 한 권한대행이 윤석열 전 대통령의 의중이 실린 이완규 헌법재판관 후보자를 지명함으로써 국민의힘 대선 후보로 추대받으려는 ‘야심’을 드러낸 것 아니냐는 추측을 하기도 한다.“
보수도 진보도 질색하는 “기회주의자 끝판왕” 한덕수
www.khan.co.kr/article/2025... [단독]경호처, ‘윤석열 체포 저지’ 반대 간부 해임징계 한덕수에 제청 - 경향신문
[단독]경호처, ‘윤석열 체포 저지’ 반대 간부 해임징...
If you say “universal healthcare” 3 times a guy in wraparound sunglasses appears to call you a marxist and then die of preventable disease in a chili’s parking lot
しおちゃです
FlutterとTauriってどっちのほうが高パフォーマンスなんだろう
내가 k8s 자체를 딱히 좋아하느건 아닌데(어차피 잘 몰라서 좋고 싫고 할것도 없음), 근데 요즘은 처음부터 k8s 쓰는게 오버엔지니어링은 아니게 되었다.
k3s같은 것도 있고(NixOS로 하면 5분이면 띄운다), 어차피 머신 적을때는 별로 설정할것도 없을 것이다. 혹시 뭔가 +알파로 해줘야할게 있을때 helm install로 날먹 할수 있다는 여지도 있다. 그 다음에 서비스 운영은 이제 docker-compose up하냐, kubectl apply -f deployment.yaml 하냐의 차이가 된다.
근데 또 복잡하지 않은 인프라라면, 때가되서 k8s로 옮기는 것도 크게 어렵지 않을 것이다. 나는 '옮기는' 종류의 일을 매우 하기 싫어/두려워하기 때문에(DB 마이그레이션 처럼) 그냥 service.k3s.enabled = true 해버린다.
RE: https://hackers.pub/@ujuc/0196189f-1c95-7120-831b-27d7c51e8f38
@andypiper outfit request: can you wear your awesome 
@forgeandcraft Fediverse t-shirt? 🙊 🤗
Over the past few weeks, we’ve shared some difficult news, a few of our projects have come to a close after not meeting their funding goals. We know that’s never easy to hear. But we also want to take a moment to share what hasn’t changed – what is continuing, growing, and making a difference every day.
IFTAS is still here. Closing a few projects has allowed us to refocus our funding, and we are fully funded for a year at least. We’re still working, collaborating, researching, advocating, and supporting. The past year has made it clearer than ever that trust and safety infrastructure for the decentralised web isn’t optional – it’s essential.
Here’s what we’re still doing, and why it matters.
Independent moderators are the backbone of the social web, and too often they’re expected to do critical work with little support or recognition. Our Moderator Needs Assessment gathers real data on what moderators need – so that platforms, peers, and funders can respond with resources that actually help. It’s about building a foundation for lasting support, rooted in lived experience. Here’s the latest report.
We’re continuing to develop CARIAD, our tool for observing safety signals and behaviours across the federated web. CARIAD offers valuable insight into abuse trends, moderation challenges, and trust indicators – empowering moderators to respond proactively while respecting the values of decentralisation and autonomy. We also still publish our Do-Not-Interact domain denylist, representing domains reviewed and labelled by IFTAS.
The IFTAS Connect community remains active, supportive, and essential. It’s a place where moderators, admins, researchers, and advocates come together to share advice, resources, and strategies for keeping their communities safe and resilient. Soon, we plan to participate in a co-design effort to create standalone moderation tooling for the Fediverse. Whether you’re new to this work or deeply embedded, Connect is a space for connection and collective problem-solving. Request an account today.
IFTAS continues to represent the interests of decentralised platforms and independent communities in broader discussions about Internet governance, safety regulation, and funding. We provide evidence-informed responses to consultations, highlight the real-world impacts of policy decisions, and advocate for the empowerment, safeguarding, and inclusion of minority and underserved groups. We’re particularly focused on how online harm translates into offline consequences – and how to better bridge that gap in practice and policy.
The Social Web ISAC is still hard at work, supporting secure, coordinated responses to threats across decentralised networks. Whether it’s technical vulnerabilities, emerging abuse patterns, or cross-network incidents, the ISAC provides a space for timely information-sharing and trusted collaboration. Follow the alerts account.
We’re also continuing to build bridges with developers, researchers, standards organisations, and fellow non-profits working on digital safety. Our work depends on these relationships – on listening to each other, learning from each other, and pushing for collective solutions that scale with care.
We know the landscape isn’t always easy. Funding can be precarious. The problems are complex. But the need for safe, inclusive, and resilient online communities hasn’t gone away, and neither have we.
IFTAS is still here. Still advocating. Still researching. Still showing up for the people doing this work at the ground level. And we’re glad you’re here with us.
Want to get involved or support what we’re doing? Join the community at connect.iftas.org or get in touch – we’d love to hear from you.
새삼 느끼는거지만
연합우주는 특정 주제/이슈에 대한 이야기가 진짜 확~ 퍼져나가기 쉬워서
퍼져나가는거 자체는 그럴수있지만 조심하는게 좋을 경우는 이제
■■에 문제있어요?
같은 말....
이거 하나 쓰면 ■■에 문제 있어요? -> 있어요? -> 있어요? 하고 퍼지더라고요 
확실하지 않은 부정적 뉴스 작성만 조심을....
논비건식에 CW를 달아야 하는 이유
* 최근 CW에 대한 피로도를 느끼는 플로우에 고민하다가 한 번 써봅니다. 출근길에 쓴 거라 많이 축약된 내용입니다.
일단 저는 비건인이 비건을 하는 게 단순히 고기를 먹지 "못해서"가 아니라는 지점이 CW를 걸어야 하는 거라고 보거든요
이거에 대해서 뭐 피곤하다거나 그런거 그럴 수 있다고 생각해요 저라고 매번 뮤트단어쓰고 쿠션 이중삼중으로 하는게 편하겠습니까? 어찌되었건 게시물 하나 올리는데에 다른 게시물에 비해 노력이 드는데
하지만 '그런 노력을 들여서까지 게시물을 올려야 하는가', '그럼으로써 논비건식을 남들에게 노출하고 논비건식을 접한 타인이 동물착취와 폭력을 연상케 해야하는가', 그리고 그 '논비건식을 타인도 섭취하고 싶게끔 해야하는가' 이런 고민을 한 번 거치게 할 수 있는 장치라고도 생각해요
논비건식은 단순히 선택의 영역이고 개인의 신념이기 때문에(사실 이보다는 호불호의 영역으로 보는 것 같지만) 강요해선 안 된다
맞는 말이죠. 하지만 당신께서 그렇게 생각할 수 있는 것 자체가 육식(그로 인해 발생하는 착취와 폭력의 현장)에 익숙하고 무디다는 증거고, 그런 의견이 주류가 되어 인정받을 수 있다는 사실 자체가 기울어진 운동장임을 증명하는 꼴입니다
이게 다른 종류의 CW는 잘 사용하는 사람이 논비건식에서만 그런다면 더 그렇죠
물론, 그럼에도 피로감을 느낀다는 의견에 공감하고 이해할 수 있습니다. 현대인으로서 내가 살아숨쉬는 모든 행위가 누군가를 착취하는 구조이니 얼마나 피곤합니까. 도덕적으로 옳은 삶을 지향한다는 건 참 쉽지 않아요
그러나 CW를 걸어야 하는 피로감에 오히려 반발감을 느끼거나 불쾌하다면 자신이 어떤 말을 하고 있는 건지에 대한 정확한 인지는 해야한다고 봅니다. 인지를 하는 상태에서 자신이 그렇게 판단한다면 어쩔 수 없는 거고, 그게 괜찮은 사람들끼리 모이고 아닌 사람들은 떠나는 수밖에 없는 거죠
이에 대하여 해당 행위에 대하여 비판하는 분위기가 도는 걸 넘어서서 "너는 왜 CW를 걸지 않느냐"며 개인에게 불링을 하는 걸로 이어지는 걸 저는 반대합니다 어떤 이유에서든 개인과 개인이 논쟁하는 게 아니라(이건 어쩔 수 없는 영역인 거 아시죠?) 개인과 다수가 싸우는 형태가 되어선 안 되니까요
더불어, 제가 비건식 가장 열심히 섭취 할 때 경험으로 뮤단이 해결방안이 될 수 없는게
논비건식 사진은 뮤트가 안 돼요 그리고 논비건식은 보통 사진만 올리는 경우가 많고 게시하는 말도 다 달라서 뮤트단어로 해결해라는 전혀 도움이 안되고 해결방안이 못 됩니다
음식못먹고 상해서 버릴때 슬픔
비싸게 주고 산거면 더 슬픔
엄마가 준거면 죄책감추가(그래서 엄마한테 음식 줄거면 한 끼에 먹을 수 있는 양만큼만 달라고 함 10년쯤 말하니 이제 약간 되는것같아요)
음식 문제로 정말 많이 싸웠는데 최근에도 안 먹는 찐빵 줘서 얼려뒀네요. 살쪘다고 뭐라 하면서 왜 탄수화물덩어리를 주는지...
여러 이유로 스트리밍은 잘 안하려고 하는데 믹스기능은 너무 편하네요..
한국앱의 구린점...데이터 느리면 못써먹을 거 됨
これはskebで描いたアオザイ長沼さん
"진보는 분열로 망한다"는 레토릭이 있는데, 왜 분열하면서도 승리할 수 없다고 생각하지? 반대로 왜 수구세력은 분열될 수 없다고 생각하지? 이 말 자체부터가 교묘한 프레임이라고 생각함.
Androidアプリ作ったこと無い
:ahonoko:
しゅいろママんの新機能ないやんと思ったらioがアップデートしないと使えないの忘れてたわ
👉 Via un navigateur...
➡️ Mastodon (microblogging fédéré) : https://mastodon.blablalinux.be/@blablalinux
➡️ PeerTube (vidéos fédérées) : https://peertube.blablalinux.be/@blablalinux
➡️ WordPress (blog fédéré) : https://blablalinux.be
➡️ Gancio (calendrier fédéré) : https://gancio.blablalinux.be
👉 Via un réseau fédéré compatible ActivityPub...
➡️ Mastodon (microblogging fédéré) : 
@blablalinux
➡️ PeerTube (vidéos fédérées) : 
@blablalinux@peertube.blablalinux.be
➡️ WordPress (blog fédéré) : @blablalinux.be
➡️ Gancio (calendrier fédéré) : 
@eventsGancio Blabla Linux
えすけーちゃんのぱんちゅ……👀
저, 저도 90% 이상의 경우 도커 컴포즈 정도가 적당한 추상화 수준이라고 생각해요...
실제로 쿠버네티스 쓰는 팀에서 일해 본 경험도 그렇고, 주변 이야기 들어 봐도 그렇고, 도입하면 도입한 것으로 인해 증가하는 엔지니어링 코스트가 분명히 있다는 점은 누구도 부인하지 않는 것 같은데요. 쿠버네티스를 제대로 쓰는 것 자체도 배워야 할 것도 많고, 엔지니어가 유능해야 하고, 망치도 들여야 하고... 웬만하면 전담할 팀이 필요하지 않나 싶어요. (전담할 '사람' 한 명으로 때우기에는, 그 사람 휴가 가면 일이 마비되니까.)
엔지니어만 100명이 넘는 곳이라면 확실히 도입의 이득이 더 크겠지만, 반대로 혼자 하는 프로젝트라면 도무지 수지타산이 안 나올 것이라고 생각합니다. 따라서 쟁점은 그 손익분기점이 어디냐일 텐데... "대부분의" 서비스는 대성공하기 전까지는 도입 안 해도 되지 않나, 조심스럽게 말씀드려 봅니다. 즉 쿠버네티스가 푸는 문제는 마세라티 문제인 것이죠...
특히 클라우드 남의 컴퓨터 를 쓰지 않고 베어메탈 쓰는 경우는 더더욱...
RE: https://hackers.pub/@hongminhee/019618b4-4aa4-7a20-8e02-cd9fed50caae
IFTAS was founded to support trust and safety across decentralised social media networks.
We are guided by a commitment to ethical governance, transparency, and the protection of marginalised and underserved communities online.
Our work centres evidence-based practices, civil speech, and the creation of safer, more equitable spaces in federated platforms.
We want to clearly reaffirm: IFTAS does not tolerate violent threats, harassment, or hate speech of any kind.
Over the past week, we have received messages requesting clarity on various activities. For the record:
We expand on each of these statements below.
Our Focus
Our focus is on supporting informed, contextualised decision-making – never on enforcing top-down rules or creating centralised controls. We encourage transparent moderation practices and community-specific policies that reflect local values and safety needs. We solicit input from the community, and then convene and work with any and all who have elected to engage with our community, subject to our community participation guidelines.
We remain committed to our mission and to the communities we serve. We will not be deterred from this work by those seeking to distract or divide. The safety and dignity of marginalised people remains at the core of all we do.
IFTAS does not tolerate intolerance.
Our Community Participation Guidelines describes the conduct we expect from our community members when engaged with IFTAS, representing IFTAS, or in IFTAS spaces.
IFTAS does not tolerate misgendering or deadnaming.
As can be evidenced by our work in this area, we are proud to have been a part of the advocacy that moved over 50 providers to explicitly prohibit targeted misgendering, deadnaming, as well as promotion or endorsement of so-called “conversion therapy”.
IFTAS does not moderate the Fediverse.
We convene and support the people who moderate content and behaviour online. We ask the moderator community what they most need help with, and we use the results of that survey to determine what IFTAS should work on. IFTAS moderates its own spaces. We do not moderate any third-party instances, and we do not expect nor demand that our community members moderate their instance(s) in any particular way. Any tools we build take the needs of the service administrator first, and leave all moderation decisions up to the service administrator. We advocate for civil speech, inclusivity, and equitable approaches. We can, by definition, only work with the people who engage with us. We do not seek to become a centralising authority, but we do seek to convene and find common ground where appropriate to reduce burden on moderators, to share the load, and to spread best practice.
IFTAS has no organisational ties to any third-party denylists, including The Bad Space project.
As part of our library of resources, IFTAS links to a range of denylist resources to be investigated by decentralised service providers, moderators, and community leaders, including a project called The Bad Space, which is a catalogue of observed federation policies based on the aggregation of findings made by nine instances. The current publicly listed sources are rage.love, queer.group, indiepocalypse.social, blackqueer.life, queer.garden, mastodon.art, solarpunk.moe, colorid.es, and cathode.church.
As best as can be seen from the project web site, the catalogue of domains for The Bad Space is openly collected, organised, and published. The project is maintained and hosted by heuristic instruments. The project lead is not a participant in any IFTAS activity.
IFTAS has no organisational ties to any of the third-party denylists listed on our Library page and does not endorse or recommend any third-party denylists.
IFTAS has no organisational ties to the FediForum event.
We attend, we often conduct a session or two, and we listen and learn from what others in the space are doing. We sponsor tickets for moderators, seeking to bring a diverse set of voices to the event. We use this event to advocate for trust and safety for minority and marginalised groups, and to highlight issues we believe the platform and app developers that attend should be aware of.
When we learned of transphobic social media posts made by one of the organisers, we were horrified, as was anyone we knew who was also considering attending. We would not have attended had it gone ahead with the organiser in place, but the event’s other organiser quickly removed the organiser who made the problematic posts from the event, and pivoted to a listening session, cancelling the usual activities. We applaud this approach and have pledged to work with new governance of the event to help create a safer, more diverse space.
IFTAS has no organisational ties to Nivenly.
While we are supportive of the organisation, we have never funded them, we are peer entities that exist in the same space. Once, IFTAS executive director Jaz-Michael King was asked to review and comment on a proposal titled “FSEP” funded by Nivenly. He was not paid. He reviewed the document, he commented on the document, but it was up to the author to take those comments on board or not.
IFTAS has one employee.
IFTAS is predominantly volunteer-driven. One full time, unpaid volunteer performs all administrative work; a volunteer non-profit board oversees the compliance, financials and legal requirements of operating a non-profit; and a group of volunteer advisors offer their expertise as and when available. From time to time, IFTAS has hired sub-contractors to perform specific scopes of work.
At one time, IFTAS attempted to create a small cadre of moderators to react to our work. We offered an honorarium-type stipend, specifically to ensure the group was diverse and not asked to provide free labour. Part of our non-profit mission is to support the uncompensated labour provided by the hardworking moderator community. The individuals that participated in this short-lived project were never employees, nor sub-contractors, although some did request and receive the honorarium. This group partially met once, and it proved to be a non-starter, no further meetings were held. No work of any kind was ever achieved, and later that year one participant was removed from IFTAS spaces after making deeply inappropriate public remarks, conduct that contravened our Community Participation Guidelines.
IFTAS does not publish any denylist that blocks entire portions of marginalised communities.
Our block recommendations and data are entirely public, transparent, and human-reviewed. No third-party list ever became an IFTAS resource.
IFTAS publishes three resources with regard to federating domains.
Various Fediverse admins have reached out to IFTAS over the past year to request we remove them from our denylists, having been misinformed that IFTAS is in some way responsible for their domain being on one or more third-party denylists. In all cases, we had not blocked or recommended blocking the domain(s).
We have, however, received persistent abuse and harassment from the domains we do recommend blocking.
IFTAS has a permissive linking policy, and this will change
IFTAS currently lists a wide range of tools, research, and third-party resources submitted by members of the community for the benefit of all moderators and administrators. However, we also recognise that inclusion in our resource library may be interpreted as endorsement or affiliation even when we state otherwise. IFTAS will begin consulting with community members and advisors on what actions we may need to take to review our approach.
We acknowledge that not all of our decisions will satisfy every party, and we respect the right to engage in principled disagreement. However, targeted harassment of IFTAS volunteers – who are often marginalised individuals themselves – crosses a boundary. IFTAS volunteers are not public figures. We ask that any criticism of our organisation or its work be directed through appropriate channels. Our community spaces are designed for collaboration, learning, and respectful disagreement. Our communications channels are the best way to reach IFTAS directly – our email is contact@iftas.org and our fediverse address is 
@iftas
IFTAS was founded to make governance and moderation tooling and resources available to the communities who need and request them, and that’s what we’re still working on. Our next blog post will walk through the activities and projects we’re putting front and center for the rest of 2025. We wrote this post to clarify our orientation toward our work, the resources we list, the communities and organizations we work alongside, and the actions we’ve taken when people inside IFTAS spaces have behaved in unacceptable ways.
가해자 사망하면 ‘공소권 없음’…김미애 “피해자에 침묵 강요” 지적
입력2025.04.09. 오전 11:09
“저명 인사들 범죄 의혹 죽음으로 회피…
피해자에 2차 피해 안기는 무책임한 현상” www.womennews.co.kr/news/article...
가해자 사망하면 ‘공소권 없음’…김미애 “피해자에 침묵...
Christine Lemmer-Webber
Stefano Marinelli
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)
Connected Places
잉어구이
유진🎀 
