What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
1

가짜뉴스와 선동과 파편화의 시대. 스스로는 순박하고 온건하고 비편향적인 입장을 취한다고 취하지만, 딛고 선 논리가 남들이 파탄내 놓은 구렁텅이인 줄을 모른다. 결국 남들이 해줄 말은 "당신 말이 처음부터 끝까지 다틀렸다" 밖에 없는데 그런 반응에는 상처입고 분노하더라... 당연함. 스스로는 소박한 진실만 말한 것인데 인신공격 수준의 대꾸가 돌아왔다고 여기기 때문임. 그런데 도대체 이 참사를 어째야하나.

0
0
0
1
0
0

Large Language Models (LLMs) are lying machines. You might say: "I use it all the time for coding or research and I find it extremely helpful". I can't and won't dispute your experience of useful, insightful, or even spiritually awakening output. I am stating that its impossible for the LLM not to lie. This is because the LLM has no concept of fact, fiction, lie, or truth. Some lies happen to be true, some lies can be insightful or helpful, some lies can even be deeply personal. Humans are wonderfully powerful pattern matchers. We can extract meaning from enormous piles of nonsense, quickly forgetting the meaningless and remembering the useful. It gives us an extremely warped perception of these systems.

This isn't a bug to be worked out or a temporary issue that some company can overcome with just one more model, its an inherent part of how the system works. LLMs are just that, language models. When fed unimaginable amounts of examples they can produce syntactically correct text. They don't have the capacity to understand and no amount of tweaking, training, or layering will produce a system that does, that's magical thinking.

0

so, the gdb protocol specifies g and G commands, "read/write target register", to transfer register values in target byte order. i don't know what must be wrong with you to define a protocol this way, but okay

... but then lldb interprets them always in the host (the machine lldb runs at) byte order.

you can't win.

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1

We are implementing the final version of RFC9421 (HTTP Signatures) in Mastodon, and would like to test this with other ActivityPub implementations.

Do you know of any AP implementations supporting both incoming (verification) and outgoing (signing) RFC9421 signatures, and if possible with support for the double-knocking mechanism as described in swicg.github.io/activitypub-ht (section 3.5)?

0
0
0

Please boost!

I'm looking for my next role as a program manager, team lead, or senior developer.

- 20+ years in open source
- 6 years experience in web dev with , , HTML, bootstrap
- 7 years experience in C, Linux kernel, embedded systems

My passions lie at the intersection of open source software development and creating welcoming spaces for people to learn and grow.

I'm currently the program manager for a technical internship program. I work remotely with a team of 4 people in New York, Brazil, and Nigeria.

Looking for a fully remote role. I'm open to relocation outside the USA.

Resume here: sage.thesharps.us/hire-me/

DM me or send an email to sage at thesharps dot us

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

After reviewing FEP-5624: Per-object reply control policies and GoToSocial's interaction policy spec, I find myself leaning toward the latter for long-term considerations, though both have merit.

FEP-5624 is admirably focused and simpler to implement, which I appreciate. However, 's approach seems to offer some architectural advantages:

  1. The three-tier permission model (allow/require approval/deny) feels more flexible than binary allow/deny
  2. Separating approval objects from interactions appears more secure against forgery
  3. The explicit handling of edge cases (mentioned users, post authors) provides clearer semantics
  4. The extensible framework allows for handling diverse interaction types, not just replies

I wonder if creating an that extracts GoToSocial's interaction policy design into a standalone standard might be worthwhile. It could potentially serve as a more comprehensive foundation for access control in .

This is merely my initial impression though. I'd be curious to hear other developers' perspectives on these approaches.

4
0

오늘은 싱글유저를 위한 패스워드 방식으로 인증정보 암호화 저장을 다시 만들었고, 내일 목표는 크롤링 소스 하나 포팅과 구글 캘린더로 출력코드 옮겨오기.

2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Let’s be absolutely clear: the President of the United States just went on national television and said “I don’t know” when asked if he’s required to uphold the Constitution. That’s not a paraphrase. That’s a direct quote. The man who took the oath of office with a hand on the Bible and the other presumably on a Big Mac has now openly admitted he has no idea what that oath actually means. - Closer To The Edge

closertotheedge.substack.com/p

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

아인종을 식재료로 취급하게 되는건 조금 더 생각을 하면 좋을 것 같기는 한데... 음... 그럼 궁극적인 질문에 닿을 수 밖에 없는지라... "아인종도 먹을 수 있다면, 사람을 먹지 말아야 할 이유가 뭐지?" 그런 연유로 던전밥에서는 초반에 "아인종(혹은 인간의 모습이 강한 마물)은 (가급적)먹지 않는다." 라는 대전제를 깔았고... ...물론 우리 라이오스는 기회만 되면 먹으려고 벼르고 있었고, 어인의 알까지는 먹었...

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

We are implementing the final version of RFC9421 (HTTP Signatures) in Mastodon, and would like to test this with other ActivityPub implementations.

Do you know of any AP implementations supporting both incoming (verification) and outgoing (signing) RFC9421 signatures, and if possible with support for the double-knocking mechanism as described in swicg.github.io/activitypub-ht (section 3.5)?

0
0
0
1
1
0
0