What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0

침착하게 생각해보자면 초범 운운은 형사범죄로 처벌받은 전력이 없다는 의미로 모든 자잘한 범죄 전과를 다 포함해서 하는 말입니다. 그러니까 전과 없으면 내란죄에서마저도 참작사유가 되고, 반대로 아무 거라도 처벌 전과가 있으면 아무 죄에서라도 참작이 안 된다는 겁니다. 여기서 어떠한 가정 하나를 세워볼 수 있는데... 몇몇 사람들이 좀 깊이 생각해보고 이게 불똥이 될 수 있음을 인식해야 함.

0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

양형이유(5) : 윤석열은 65세 이상의 비교적 고령. 김용현 독단적으로 부정선거 수사하려는 계획도 있던 것으로 보임. 윤석열의 비이성적 결심 옆에서 조장한 측면 있음. 다만 물리력 행사 자제시키려 했던 것으로 보이고 대부분 실패로 돌아감. 범죄전력이 없고 장기간 공무원 봉직. 65세 이상 고령.

0

양형이유(4) : 개별적 양형사유. 윤석열 직접 주도적 계획. 다수를 관여시킴. 막대한 사회적 비용 초래. 사과의 모습 없음. 재판 과정에 출석 거부 등. 다만 아주 치밀하게 계획한 것으로 보이진 않음. 물리력 행사 자제시키려 한 흔적도 보임. 대부분 실패로 돌아갔고 범죄전력이 없고,

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
0
0
0
0
0

구체적 죄책 여부(6) : 국회경비대장 목현태의 경우 억울한 사정이 있지 않나 열심히 살펴봤음에도 공범으로 인정. 국회의원 출입 차단 지시를 받고 그대로 이행. 사무처에서도 명시적 항의를 받았음에도 계속 가담. 미필적으로나마 자신들의 행위가 사정에 대해 알았단 걸 부인하기 어려움.

0
0
0

Today, 443 days after declaring martial law on December 3, 2024, former President Yoon Suk Yeol was sentenced to life in prison for leading an insurrection. The court found that his martial law decree, the deployment of troops to blockade the National Assembly, and the attempt to detain political figures constituted an act of insurrection against the constitutional order.

https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/southkorea/politics/20260219/ex-president-yoon-suk-yeol-sentenced-to-life-for-leading-insurrection

Many Koreans had hoped for the death penalty—the prosecution had asked for it, and the charge of leading an insurrection only allows three possible sentences: death, life with labor, or life without labor. The court chose life.

I have complicated feelings about this. As someone who believes the death penalty should be abolished, I shouldn't want it imposed on anyone, and in principle I don't—not even on Yoon. But there's a practical dilemma that's hard to ignore. South Korea has a precedent here: Chun Doo-hwan, who led the 1980 military coup and the Gwangju massacre, was sentenced to death at his first trial, reduced to life on appeal, and then pardoned by President Kim Young-sam. He walked free. If the starting point is already life in prison rather than death, it's even easier for an appeals court to reduce the sentence further, and for some future president to pardon him down the road.

So the discomfort isn't really about wanting Yoon to die. It's about the gap between what the sentence says and what actually happens in practice. And that points to a deeper problem: the presidential pardon power. As long as a sitting president can unilaterally pardon anyone—including someone convicted of trying to overthrow the very constitutional order the presidency is supposed to protect—no sentence feels truly final. I'd rather see the death penalty abolished and the pardon power curtailed, so that life in prison actually means life in prison.

0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

대통령 피선거권을 40세 이상부터 갖게 하는 이유가 뭔데... 고령이고 내란에 실패했다는 이유를 감형 사유로 참작하면, 더 젊어서 사회를 휘젓고 내란에 성공해 봐라라는 얘기밖에 더 되나?

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:iqga7bwbwbdo4z6suofriwa5/post/3mf6znrbnlk2v

0