What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
0

"Cheery was aware that Commander Vimes didn't like the phrase 'The innocent have nothing to fear', believing the innocent had everything to fear, mostly from the guilty but in the longer term even more from those who say things like 'The innocent have nothing to fear'."
Terry Pratchett, Snuff

0
0
2

Looking for suggestions! The DE&I book club at work is looking for a new book to discuss and I nudged the theme of ableism.

What are your recommendations?
For non fiction I'd expect something about the medical vs social model, but haven't read a book on the topic myself.

As background: colleagues with visible disabilities is not common for us, neuro diversity is definitely common (that does not mean understood 😉). Allyship, different cultures, gender diversity and racism have been discussed

0

𝗡𝗬𝗖 𝟭𝟵𝟳𝟵: 4 St. Mark's Place, next door to Trash & Vaudeville. Took me almost 40 years to realise I'd inadvertently photographed an example of Jean-Michel Basquiat's and Al Diaz's SAMO© collaboration... while I was taking a shot of T&V, the yoots hanging out on the steps next door insisted I photograph them too. If it weren't for those meddling kids I probably would have missed that tag on the door.

'𝗝𝗼𝗵𝗻 𝗠𝗮𝗵𝗲𝗿 - 𝗔 𝗧𝗲𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗕𝘂𝘇𝘇𝗰𝗼𝗰𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗬𝗼𝗿𝗸 (𝟭𝟵𝟳𝟵-𝟭𝟵𝟴𝟬)'
Runs until April 20th at Trongate 103.

0

Here is how I test my GitHub CI from the terminal! 💯

🌀 **wrkflw** — Validate and execute GitHub Actions workflows locally

🔥 Supports viewing logs, outputs, and execution details

🧵 Parallel runs, emulation mode & more!

🦀 Written in Rust & built with @ratatui_rsRatatui

⭐ GitHub: github.com/bahdotsh/wrkflw

0
1
0
0
0

Please !

Given that now a lot of trans people from the UK might be in need to migrate to safer countries, if you have verified fundraisers for them, please pass them my way!

I help run alongside my comrades and we would regularly boost fundraiser campaigns for our English trans friends. Check the hashtag for other fundraisers to donate to/boost some of the migration fundraisers for our USian friends.

Thank you for helping.

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

=출처 비상행동 텔레그램= 🥳파면 뒤풀이🎉사회대개혁 앞풀이🎂 12.3 내란의 밤 이후 123일 동안의 치열한 투쟁으로 윤석열 파면을 이끈 우리! 광장의 승리를 만들어낸 서로의 얼굴을 보며 기나긴 겨울을 위로하고 새로 맞은 봄을 축하합시다💐 우리가 앞으로 만들어 갈 다시 만날 세계는 어떤 모습일지 이야기 나누고 힘을 모아봅시다✨ 🌈 일시 : 2025. 4. 19.(토) 12시~14시 🍀 장소 : 향린교회 1층 🍊 대상 : 사전 신청을 통해 모집한 광장시민 70명

0
0
0
0

"우리는 시민의 힘으로 윤석열 파면이라는 민주주의의 승리를 쟁취했습니다. 하지만 안심하기에는 아직 이릅니다. 여전히 내란 동조 세력들은 버젓이 권력을 차지한 채 호시탐탐 기회를 엿보고 있습니다. 내란수괴 윤석열을 재구속하고 내란 세력을 온전히 청산하는 것만이 진정한 사회대개혁으로 가는 첫 걸음이 될 것입니다. 더 나은 사회와 미래를 위해 함께 해주십시요!"

0

=출처 비상행동 텔레그램= ✊내란 종식, 사회대개혁을 위한 시민행진 📌 일시, 장소 : 2025년 4월 19일(토) 오후 5시 30분, 광화문 동십자각 * 집회 시간이 오후 5시 30분으로 변경되었습니다* 📌공식 시민후원 : 카카오뱅크 7942-09-53862 심규협(내란청산·사회대개혁 비상행동) 🎤 시민 발언 신청 :  bs1203.net/voice

[시민발언신청]🎤 내란청산·사회대개혁 비상행동

✅ 별도의 표기가 없는 경우, 시민발언 사전신청은 행사일 전날 오후 12시까지 받습니다. (긴급집회는 당일 낮 12시) ✅ 발언 신청자가 많을 경우 주최측에서 추첨 등의 방식으로 발언자를 선정해 직접 연락드립니다. ‼️ 안내사항 집회 시간이 한정되어 있습니다. 발언은 3분 내(공백 제외 800자 이내)로 미리 준비해주시기 바랍니다. 발언 시 반말 및 비속어를 사용하지 않으며, 여성, 성소수자, 장애인, 청소년, 이주민 등 사회적 소수자와 비인간동물을 차별하거나 배제하는 말을 하지 않습니다. * 예시 (참고하여 발언 내용에서 제외해주세요!) - 장애를 빗대어 ‘눈 먼 장님’, ‘정신적 불구 상태’, 윤석열을 비판하며 ‘정신병자’, ‘지랄’, ‘망상장애 환자’ 등. - 여성에게 '마음도 얼굴만큼 예쁘다', 김건희를 비판하며 'ㅇㅇ년' 등. - 청소년/20대 청년에게 ‘기특하다’, ‘우리 아이’ 등, 윤석열을 비판하며 ‘5살 아이에게 총을 쥐어준 것과 같다’ 등. - 동물을 비하하며 '멧돼지를 쳐죽이자', '미친 돼지 윤석열' 등. - 빈곤을 차별하고 혐오하는 발언 '거지같다' 등. 특정 정당 또는 정치인을 옹호하거나 반복적으로 연호하는 등의 발언과 행위를 삼가주십시오. 발언이 선정되지 않을 수도 있습니다. 발언 선정이 되지 않은 경우 별도의 안내 연락을 드리지는 않고 있습니다. 양해 부탁드립니다. 당일 발언은 @비상행동 유튜브 계정으로 라이브 송출되며, 집회 이후에도 위 계정을 통해 확인할 수 있습니다. 📣 발언 내용, 이렇게 준비해주세요! 내란세력 청산 등 현 정치상황 관련 내용이 반영될 수 있도록 해주세요. 발언자님의 삶과 현 정치 상황이 맞닿은, 생생한 이야기를 환영합니다. 사회대개혁 열망을 담은 발언을 환영합니다. 다만, 시간 제약(3분 내)으로 인해 다양한 주제를 담기보다는 1가지의 주된 주제를 준비해주시면 좋습니다.

docs.google.com · Google Docs

0

The court’s basis for affirming this protection was existing precedent that negative discrimination is still illegal if based on a characteristic that the discriminating party perceived the discriminated party to have, whether or not that perception is correct. (Concrete [invented] example: if someone were discriminated against on the basis of a Jewish-sounding or Muslim-sounding name, but were not actually Jewish or Muslim, they could still claim religious and racial discrimination.)

0

Also, the court affirmed certain protections against negative discrimination do continue to apply to trans women. There are two ways this could be read:

The first and most obvious is that trans people of gender x cannot benefit *in general* from positive discrimination in favour of gender x, but can benefit from protection against negative discrimination against gender x.

This would be the better of the two interpretations. Unfortunately …

The court’s basis for affirming this protection was existing precedent that negative discrimination is still illegal if based on a characteristic that the discriminating party perceived the discriminated party to have, whether or not that perception is correct. (Concrete [invented] example: if someone were discriminated against on the basis of a Jewish-sounding or Muslim-sounding name, but were not actually Jewish or Muslim, they could still claim religious and racial discrimination.)

0

This case concerned positive discrimination and whether a trans woman appointed to a position with a gender quota would count as a woman. The court said no.

It might be taken to imply that a trans man appointed to a similar position also would not count as a man, but much of the reasoning in the written decision considers only trans women. Maybe a trans man would count as a man if the cause were fought again: stranger things have happened in British law.

Also, the court affirmed certain protections against negative discrimination do continue to apply to trans women. There are two ways this could be read:

The first and most obvious is that trans people of gender x cannot benefit *in general* from positive discrimination in favour of gender x, but can benefit from protection against negative discrimination against gender x.

This would be the better of the two interpretations. Unfortunately …

0

The good news:

This case was fought by the Scottish government, which could now introduce primary legislation in Holyrood to reverse the effect of the decision in Scotland. I expect there would be another fight over this: ‘Equal opportunities’ is, with some exceptions, a Reserved Matter in the Scotland Act 1998. They may well be able to get this in under an exception.

Trans people in England and Wales and NI could not benefit from this, though.

We’ll see how the Scottish govt plays this now.

This case concerned positive discrimination and whether a trans woman appointed to a position with a gender quota would count as a woman. The court said no.

It might be taken to imply that a trans man appointed to a similar position also would not count as a man, but much of the reasoning in the written decision considers only trans women. Maybe a trans man would count as a man if the cause were fought again: stranger things have happened in British law.

0

The two fundamental planks of today’s decision are:

1. the Gender Recognition Act 2004 did not change the meaning of ‘man’ and ‘woman’ in the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, although the relevant section of the GRA on its face did not contain any limitation on the application of a certificate in determining who is a ‘man’ and who a ‘woman’

2. the Equality Act 2010 inherited from the SDA 1975 this definition wholesale, since its purpose was to consolidate existing law

0
0

The two fundamental planks of today’s decision are:

1. the Gender Recognition Act 2004 did not change the meaning of ‘man’ and ‘woman’ in the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, although the relevant section of the GRA on its face did not contain any limitation on the application of a certificate in determining who is a ‘man’ and who a ‘woman’

2. the Equality Act 2010 inherited from the SDA 1975 this definition wholesale, since its purpose was to consolidate existing law

0

I think both of these are wrong individually – in using the long title of the EA 2010 to ascertain its purpose, it appears to have ignored the potential effect of the word ‘reform’ in ‘harmonise and reform’ – but this is now the law.

The good news:

This case was fought by the Scottish government, which could now introduce primary legislation in Holyrood to reverse the effect of the decision in Scotland. I expect there would be another fight over this: ‘Equal opportunities’ is, with some exceptions, a Reserved Matter in the Scotland Act 1998. They may well be able to get this in under an exception.

Trans people in England and Wales and NI could not benefit from this, though.

We’ll see how the Scottish govt plays this now.

0

ところでfedibird.comですが、comドメインなので、アメリカのベリサインがドメインを管理しています。

ベリサインが気に入らなければ、ドメインが剥奪されるかもしれません。

ドメインの登録とネームサーバの運用はアメリカのCloudflareを利用しています。

Cloudflareが気に入らなければ、ドメインやネームサーバをロックされるかもしれません。

画像サーバのキャッシュはcloudflareを利用していますが、これはネームサーバをロックされなければいつでも切り替えられます。

メディアを保存するオブジェクトストレージは、アメリカのWasabiを利用しています。

サーバは日本国内のNTTビルにありますが、Wasabiが気に入らなければサービス停止されるかもしれません。

このあたりまでは、アメリカの影響を受ける可能性があります。

サーバの実行プロセスやデータベースは、日本のカゴヤ・ジャパン株式会社を利用しています。全文検索のサーバは日本のさくらインターネットを利用しています。

同様に事業者が気に入らなければサービス停止されるかもしれません。

ただ、日本企業の日本拠点なので、国内法のもと、日本語で、日本の裁判所で話ができます。

0
0
0
0
0

Now starting at ICT.OPEN: a panel discussion on the Future of Education in the Era of Generative AI. As a freshly-minted assistant professor with increasingly many teaching responsibilities, I am keen!

ictopen.nl/programme/the-futur















Five people sitting on a stage in front of a slide that says: Plenary session - The future of Education in the Era of Generative AI.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

自分が :mastodon::vivaldi_blue: で始める前から mstdn.jp は「人数は多いけど、なんかここにはアカウントは作りたくないなあ…」という雰囲気だったからサーバーがドイツにあるというのはすごく意外だった(そりゃあ当然 BAN されるよねという感想しかない…

fedibird.com/@noellabo/1143462

0
0
0